1.
Kurki, M, Wright, C: International Relations and Social Science [IN] International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006).
2.
Lamont, C.: Chapter 1 Research Methods in International relations [IN] Research methods in international relations. In: Research methods in international relations. pp. 13–29. SAGE, London (2015).
3.
Kurki, M.: Chapter 1 [IN] Causation in international relations: reclaiming causal analysis. In: Causation in International Relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491481.
4.
Jackson, P.T.: The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Routledge, London (2011).
5.
Lebow, R.N.: Constructing Cause in International Relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107256538.
6.
Klotz, A., Prakash, D.: Qualitative methods in international relations: a pluralist guide. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke [England] (2008).
7.
Hollis, M., Smith, S.M.: Explaining and understanding international relations. Clarendon, Oxford (1990).
8.
Little, R.: International Relations and the Methodological Turn. Political Studies. 39, 463–478 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb01623.x.
9.
Grix, Jonathan: Introducing Students to the Generic Terminology of Social Research. Politics. 22, (2002).
10.
Bonditti, P., Neal, A., Opitz, S., Zebrowski, C.: Geneaology [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. In: Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. pp. 159–188. Routledge, London (2015).
11.
Aradau, ClaudiaRens van Munster: Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations. 13, 89–115.
12.
Moon, C.: Narrating Political Reconciliation: Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Social & Legal Studies. (2006).
13.
ANDREW W. NEAL: Foucault in Guantánamo: Towards an Archaeology of the Exception. Security Dialogue. 37, 31–46 (2006).
14.
VUCETIC, S.: Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 37, 1295–1312 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000938.
15.
Howarth, D.R.: Discourse. Open University Press, Buckingham (2000).
16.
Milliken, Jennifer: The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations. 5,.
17.
Aradau, Claudia: Genealogy [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. In: Full details and actions for Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Routledge (2014).
18.
Aradau, Claudia: Visuality [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. In: Full details and actions for Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Routledge (2014).
19.
Dean, M.: Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. SAGE, Los Angeles, Calif (2010).
20.
Aradau, Claudia; Rens van Munster: Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations. 13, 89–115.
21.
Jeremy Walker; Melinda Cooper: Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security. 42, 143–160 (2011).
22.
Iraq Inquiry - Sir John Chilcot’s public statement, 6 July 2016, https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20171123124608/http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/the-inquiry/sir-john-chilcots-public-statement/.
23.
Tony Blair statement in response to The Report of the Iraq Inquiry, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chilcot-report-tony-blair-read-response-statement-in-full-iraq-war-inquiry-a7123251.html.
24.
Anderson, B.: Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography. 34, 777–798 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362600.
25.
Blix, H.: Disarming Iraq. Bloomsbury Publishing, London (2005).
26.
Farson, A.S., Phythian, M.: Chapter 4 The Politics of Commissions of Inquiry into Security and Intelligence Controversies in Britain [IN] Commissions of Inquiry and National Security. In: Commissions of inquiry and national security: comparative approaches. Praeger Security International, Santa Barbara, Calif (2011).
27.
Phythian, Mark: Policing Uncertainty: Intelligence, Security and Risk. Intelligence & National Security. 27, 187–205 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2012.661642.
28.
Ralph, Jason: After Chilcot: the ‘doctrine of international community’ and the UK decision to invade Iraq. Journal of Politics & International Relations. 13, (2011).
29.
Thomas, O.D.: Good faith and (dis)honest mistakes? Learning from Britain’s Iraq War Inquiry. Politics. 37, 371–385 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395716688488.
30.
Zalewski, M.: Feminist International Relations: Making sense ... [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. In: Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. pp. 3–13. Taylor & Francis, New York (2014).
31.
J. Ann Tickner: You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 41, (1997).
32.
Enloe, C.: Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. University of California Press, Berkeley (2014).
33.
Hutchings, Kimberly: 1988 and 1998: Contrast and continuity in feminist international relations. MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808093732.
34.
Zalewski, M., Parpart, J.L.: ‘Introduction: From the "Woman” Question to the "Man” Question in International Relations’ [IN] The "Man” Question in International Relations. In: The ‘man’ question in international relations. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado (1998).
35.
Adam Jones: Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 22, 405–429 (1996).
36.
Peterson, V.S.: Gendered states: feminist (re)visions of international relations theory. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, Colo (1992).
37.
V. Spike Peterson: Global gender issues. Westview Press, Boulder, CO (1999).
38.
Jan Jindy Pettman: Worlding Women : A Feminist International Politics. Routledge (1996).
39.
Riley, R.L., Mohanty, C.T., Pratt, M.B.: Feminism and war: confronting US imperialism. Zed, London (2008).
40.
Zalewski, M.: ‘Well, what is the feminist perspective on Bosnia?’ International Affairs. 71, 339–356 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/2623438.
41.
Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires: Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review of International Studies. 24, (1998).
42.
Hansen, L.: Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. In: Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. pp. 14–23. Taylor & Francis, New York (2014).
43.
Hansen, L.: Gender, Nation, Rape: Bosnia and the Construction of Security. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 3, 55–75 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740010019848.
44.
Ackerly, B.A., Stern, M., True, J.: Feminist methodologies for international relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2006).
45.
Enloe, C.: III ‘Gender’ is not enough: the need for a feminist consciousness. International Affairs. 80, 95–97 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00370.x.
46.
Letherby, G.: Feminist research in theory and practice. Open University Press, Buckingham (2003).
47.
Review by: R. Charli Carpenter: Review: Gender Theory in World Politics: Contributions of a Nonfeminist Standpoint? International Studies Review. 4, (2002).
48.
Ribbens McCarthy, J., Edwards, R.: Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: public knowledge and private lives. SAGE, London (1998).
49.
Jones, A., Taylor & Francis: Gender inclusive: essays on violence, men, and feminist international relations. Routledge, London (2009).
50.
Zalewski, Marysia.: Feminism after postmodernism : theorising through practice. London : Routledge, 2000.
51.
Blanchard, E.M.: Gender, International Relations, and the Development of Feminist Security Theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 28, 1289–1312 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1086/368328.
52.
Koo, KL: Confronting a disciplinary blindness: Women, war and rape in the international politics of security. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE; (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/1036114022000032744.
53.
Rowley, C.: Popular culture and the politics of the visual [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. In: Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Taylor & Francis, New York (2014).
54.
Bleiker, R.: The Power of Images in Global Politics, https://www.e-ir.info/2018/03/08/the-power-of-images-in-global-politics/.
55.
ALEX DANCHEV and DEBBIE LISLE: Introduction: art, politics, purpose. Review of International Studies. 35, (2009).
56.
Moore, Cerwyn; Shepherd, Laura J.: Aesthetics and International Relations: Towards a Global Politics. Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations. 24, 299–309 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2010.485564.
57.
Schlag, G., Geis, A.: Visualizing violence: aesthetics and ethics in international politics. Global Discourse. 7, 193–200 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2017.1359995.
58.
FRANK MÖLLER: The looking/not looking dilemma. Review of International Studies. 35, (2009).
59.
Butler, Judith: Torture and the ethics of photography. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY &. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1068/d2506jb.
60.
Mirzoeff, N.: Introduction: For Critical Visuality Studies [IN] The Visual Culture Reader. In: The visual culture reader. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon [England] (2013).
61.
Weldes, J., Rowley, C.: So, how does popular culture relate to world politics? [IN] Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies. In: Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies. pp. 11–34. E-International Relations Publishing, Bristol (2015).
62.
Paul Messaris: Visual ‘literacy’. Westview Press, Boulder (1994).
63.
Haraway, D: The persistence of vision [IN] The Visual Culture Reader. In: The visual culture reader. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon [England] (2013).
64.
Jean Baudrillard: Photography, Or The Writing Of Light. CTheory. 4-12/2000 (2000).
65.
Ranciere, J: Notes on the photographic image [IN] The Visual Culture Reader. In: The visual culture reader. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon [England] (2013).
66.
Metz, C.: Photography and Fetish. October. 34, (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/778490.
67.
Bleiker, R.: Pluralist Methods for Visual Global Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 43, 872–890 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815583084.
68.
Review of International Studies. 35, (2009).
69.
Vicki Squire: 12 days in Lampedusa: The potential and perils of a photo essay @FocaalBlog, http://www.focaalblog.com/2016/01/11/vicki-squire-12-days-in-lampedusa-the-potential-and-perils-of-a-photo-essay/.
70.
Lisle, D., Johnson, H.L.: Lost in the aftermath. Security Dialogue. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010618762271.
71.
Rose, G., Tolia-Kelly, D.P.: Visuality/materiality: images, objects and practices. Ashgate, Farnham (2012).
72.
Rose, G.: Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. SAGE, Los Angeles (2016).
73.
Latham, Alan: Research, performance, and doing human geography: some reflections on the diary-photograph, diary-interview method. Environment & Planning A. 35, 1993–2017 (2003).
74.
HANSEN, L.: How images make world politics: International icons and the case of Abu Ghraib. Review of International Studies. 41, 263–288 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210514000199.
75.
Hansen, Lene: Reading Comics for the Field of International Relations: Theory, Method and the Bosnian War. European Journal of International Relations,. 581–608 (2017).
76.
Callahan, W.A.: The Visual Turn in IR: Documentary Filmmaking as a Critical Method. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 43, 891–910 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815578767.
77.
Campbell, D.: Geopolitics and visuality: Sighting the Darfur conflict. Political Geography. 26, 357–382 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.11.005.
78.
Michael J. Shapiro: Cinematic Geopolitics. Taylor & Francis Group (2008).
79.
Shepherd, Laura J.: Aesthetics, Ethics, and Visual Research in the Digital Age: "Undone in the Face of the Otter’. MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES; (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816684255.
80.
Smith, L.T.: Introduction [IN] Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. In: Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. pp. 30–56. Zed Books, London (2012).
81.
Smith, L.T.: Chapter 12 Getting the Story Right, Telling the Story Well: Indigenous Activism, Indigenous Research [IN] Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. In: Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. pp. 343–359. Zed Books, London (2012).
82.
Sayad, A., Bourdieu, P., Macey, D.: The suffering of the immigrant. Polity, Cambridge, England (2004).
83.
Mamdani, M.: Define and Rule: Native as Political Identity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (2012).
84.
Gupta, A., Ferguson, J.: The Field as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology [IN] Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science. In: Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif (1997).
85.
Bhambra, Gurminder K.: Brexit, Trump, and "methodological whiteness’: on the misrecognition of race and class. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY; (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12317.
86.
Borneman, J., Hammoudi, A.: The Fieldwork Encounter, Experience, and the Making of Truth: An Introduction [IN] Being there: the fieldwork encounter and the making of truth. In: Being There: the Fieldwork Encounter and the Making of Truth. University of California Press, Berkeley (2009).
87.
Kirin Narayan: How Native Is a ‘Native’ Anthropologist? American Anthropologist. 95, (1993).
88.
A Passage to Britain - BBC, https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/playlists/183729.
89.
Said, E.W.: Orientalism. Penguin, Harmondsworth (2003).
90.
Said, E.W.: Culture and imperialism. Vintage, London (1994).
91.
Fanon, F.: Black skin, white masks. Pluto Press, London (2008).
92.
Spivak, G.C.: In other worlds: essays in cultural politics. Routledge, New York (1988).
93.
Bhabha, H.K.: The location of culture. Routledge, London (2004).
94.
Young, R.: Postcolonialism: an historical introduction. Blackwell, Oxford (2001).
95.
Lamont, C.: Chapter 4 Writing a Literature Review [IN] Research methods in international relations. In: Research methods in international relations. pp. 64–76. SAGE, London (2015).
96.
Ridley, D.: The literature review: a step-by-step guide for students. SAGE, London (2012).
97.
Hart, C.: Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination. SAGE, Los Angeles (2018).
98.
Andrews, R.: Research questions. Continuum, London (2003).
99.
Hancke, Bob: Chapter 11: The challenge of research design [IN] Theory and Methods in Political Science. In: Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2010).
100.
Benjamin Baez: Confidentiality in qualitative research: reflections on secrets, power and agency. Qualitative Research. 2, 35–58 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001638.
101.
Bulmer, M.: Social research ethics: an examination of the merits of covert participant observation. Macmillan, London (1982).
102.
Etherington, K.: Ethical Research in Reflexive Relationships. Qualitative Inquiry. 13, 599–616 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407301175.
103.
Hobbs, D., Wright, R.: The SAGE handbook of fieldwork. SAGE, London (2006).
104.
Homan, R.: The Ethics of Open Methods. The British Journal of Sociology. 43, (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/591538.
105.
Lamont, C.: Chapter 2 Research questions and Research Design [IN] Research methods in international relations. In: Research methods in international relations. pp. 30–48. SAGE, London (2015).
106.
Halperin, S., Heath, O.: Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press, New York, NY (2017).
107.
Marsh, D., Stoker, G.: Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2010).
108.
Introduction and Chapter 1 [IN] Research Methods in Politics. In: Research methods in politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2008).
