[1]
Kurki, M and Wright, C, ‘International Relations and Social Science [IN] International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
[2]
C. Lamont, ‘Chapter 1 Research Methods in International relations [IN] Research methods in international relations’, in Research methods in international relations, London: SAGE, 2015, pp. 13–29.
[3]
M. Kurki, ‘Chapter 1 [IN] Causation in international relations: reclaiming causal analysis.’, in Causation in International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9780511491481/type/book
[4]
P. T. Jackson, The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. London: Routledge, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315731360
[5]
R. N. Lebow, Constructing Cause in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781107256538
[6]
A. Klotz and D. Prakash, Qualitative methods in international relations: a pluralist guide. Basingstoke [England]: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780230584129
[7]
M. Hollis and S. M. Smith, Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford: Clarendon, 1990.
[8]
R. Little, ‘International Relations and the Methodological Turn’, Political Studies, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 463–478, Sep. 1991, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb01623.x.
[9]
Grix, Jonathan, ‘Introducing Students to the Generic Terminology of Social Research.’, Politics., vol. 22, no. Issue 3, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=7317022&site=eds-live&scope=site
[10]
P. Bonditti, A. Neal, S. Opitz, and C. Zebrowski, ‘Geneaology [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis’, in Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis, London: Routledge, 2015, pp. 159–188 [Online]. Available: https://shibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&target=https%3A%2F%2Fshibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net%2Fshib%3Fdest%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.vlebooks.com%252FSHIBBOLETH%253Fdest%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.vlebooks.com%25252Fvleweb%25252Fproduct%25252Fopenreader%25253Fid%25253DExeter%252526isbn%25253D9781134716197
[11]
Aradau, ClaudiaRens van Munster, ‘Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 13, pp. 89–115 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/211984815?accountid=10792
[12]
Moon, C., ‘Narrating Political Reconciliation: Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa’, Social & Legal Studies, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/solestu15&id=253
[13]
ANDREW W. NEAL, ‘Foucault in Guantánamo: Towards an Archaeology of the Exception’, Security Dialogue, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 31–46, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.26299471&site=eds-live&scope=site
[14]
S. VUCETIC, ‘Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, vol. 37, no. 03, pp. 1295–1312, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000938.
[15]
D. R. Howarth, Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780335231836
[16]
Milliken, Jennifer, ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods.’, European Journal of International Relations., vol. 5, no. Issue 2 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=4543934&site=eds-live&scope=site
[17]
Aradau, Claudia, ‘Genealogy [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis’, in Full details and actions for Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis, Routledge, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/Product/Index/424456?page=0
[18]
Aradau, Claudia, ‘Visuality [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis’, in Full details and actions for Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis, Routledge, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/Product/Index/424456?page=0
[19]
M. Dean, Governmentality: power and rule in modern society, 2nd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781446205747
[20]
Aradau, Claudia; Rens van Munster, ‘Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 13, pp. 89–115 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/211984815?accountid=10792
[21]
Jeremy Walker; Melinda Cooper, ‘Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation’, Security, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 143–160, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.26301757&site=eds-live&scope=site
[22]
‘Iraq Inquiry - Sir John Chilcot’s public statement, 6 July 2016’. [Online]. Available: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20171123124608/http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/the-inquiry/sir-john-chilcots-public-statement/
[23]
‘Tony Blair statement in response to The Report of the Iraq Inquiry’. [Online]. Available: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chilcot-report-tony-blair-read-response-statement-in-full-iraq-war-inquiry-a7123251.html
[24]
B. Anderson, ‘Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 777–798, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1177/0309132510362600.
[25]
H. Blix, Disarming Iraq, [Updated edition with a new chapter]. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2005.
[26]
A. S. Farson and M. Phythian, ‘Chapter 4 The Politics of Commissions of Inquiry into Security and Intelligence Controversies in Britain [IN] Commissions of Inquiry and National Security’, in Commissions of inquiry and national security: comparative approaches, Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger Security International, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780313384691
[27]
Phythian, Mark, ‘Policing Uncertainty: Intelligence, Security and Risk.’, Intelligence & National Security., vol. 27, no. Issue 2, pp. 187–205, 2012, doi: 10.1080/02684527.2012.661642. [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=74638643&site=eds-live&scope=site
[28]
Ralph, Jason, ‘After Chilcot: the “doctrine of international community” and the UK decision to invade Iraq’, Journal of Politics & International Relations, vol. 13, no. 3, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ich&AN=ICHA981628&site=eds-live&scope=site
[29]
O. D. Thomas, ‘Good faith and (dis)honest mistakes? Learning from Britain’s Iraq War Inquiry’, Politics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 371–385, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0263395716688488.
[30]
M. Zalewski, ‘Feminist International Relations: Making sense ... [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations’, in Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations, 2nd ed., New York: Taylor & Francis, 2014, pp. 3–13 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=32&docID=1744166&tm=1543402809598
[31]
J. Ann Tickner, ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855
[32]
C. Enloe, Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics, 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt6wqbn6
[33]
Hutchings, Kimberly, ‘1988 and 1998: Contrast and continuity in feminist international relations’, MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, 2008, doi: 10.1177/0305829808093732. [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000258565000005&site=eds-live&scope=site
[34]
M. Zalewski and J. L. Parpart, ‘‘Introduction: From the "Woman” Question to the "Man” Question in International Relations’ [IN] The "Man” Question in International Relations’, in The ‘man’ question in international relations, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1998.
[35]
Adam Jones, ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 405–429, 1996 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.20097459&site=eds-live&scope=site
[36]
V. S. Peterson, Gendered states: feminist (re)visions of international relations theory. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner, 1992.
[37]
V. Spike Peterson, Global gender issues. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999.
[38]
Jan Jindy Pettman, Worlding Women : A Feminist International Politics, 1st ed. Routledge, 1996 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=254158
[39]
R. L. Riley, C. T. Mohanty, and M. B. Pratt, Feminism and war: confronting US imperialism. London: Zed, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781848133662
[40]
M. Zalewski, ‘“Well, what is the feminist perspective on Bosnia?”’, International Affairs, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 339–356, Apr. 1995, doi: 10.2307/2623438.
[41]
Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires, ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’, Review of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[42]
L. Hansen, ‘Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations’, in Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations, 2nd ed., New York: Taylor & Francis, 2014, pp. 14–23 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=43&docID=1744166&tm=1543415143648
[43]
L. Hansen, ‘Gender, Nation, Rape: Bosnia and the Construction of Security’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 55–75, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1080/14616740010019848. [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616740010019848
[44]
B. A. Ackerly, M. Stern, and J. True, Feminist methodologies for international relations, [1st ed.]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://encore.exeter.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2555274
[45]
C. Enloe, ‘III “Gender” is not enough: the need for a feminist consciousness’, International Affairs, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 95–97, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00370.x.
[46]
G. Letherby, Feminist research in theory and practice. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780335226160
[47]
Review by: R. Charli Carpenter, ‘Review: Gender Theory in World Politics: Contributions of a Nonfeminist Standpoint?’, International Studies Review, vol. 4, no. 3, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3186468?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[48]
J. Ribbens McCarthy and R. Edwards, Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: public knowledge and private lives. London: SAGE, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://methods.sagepub.com/book/feminist-dilemmas-in-qualitative-research
[49]
A. Jones and Taylor & Francis, Gender inclusive: essays on violence, men, and feminist international relations, vol. 68. London: Routledge, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&redirectUri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.taylorfrancis.com%2Fbooks%2F9780203887097
[50]
Zalewski, Marysia., Feminism after postmodernism : theorising through practice. London : Routledge, 2000.
[51]
E. M. Blanchard, ‘Gender, International Relations, and the Development of Feminist Security Theory’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1289–1312, Jun. 2003, doi: 10.1086/368328.
[52]
Koo, KL, ‘Confronting a disciplinary blindness: Women, war and rape in the international politics of security’, AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE;, 2002, doi: 10.1080/1036114022000032744. [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000179361100008&site=eds-live&scope=site
[53]
C. Rowley, ‘Popular culture and the politics of the visual [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations’, in Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations, 2nd ed., New York: Taylor & Francis, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=1744166
[54]
R. Bleiker, ‘The Power of Images in Global Politics’, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/03/08/the-power-of-images-in-global-politics/
[55]
ALEX DANCHEV and DEBBIE LISLE, ‘Introduction: art, politics, purpose’, Review of International Studies, vol. 35, no. 4, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40588073?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[56]
Moore, Cerwyn; Shepherd, Laura J., ‘Aesthetics and International Relations: Towards a Global Politics.’, Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations., vol. 24, no. Issue 3, pp. 299–309, 2010, doi: 10.1080/13600826.2010.485564. [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=52174106&site=eds-live&scope=site
[57]
G. Schlag and A. Geis, ‘Visualizing violence: aesthetics and ethics in international politics’, Global Discourse, vol. 7, no. 2–3, pp. 193–200, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/23269995.2017.1359995.
[58]
FRANK MÖLLER, ‘The looking/not looking dilemma’, Review of International Studies, vol. 35, no. 4, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40588074?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[59]
Butler, Judith, ‘Torture and the ethics of photography’, ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY &, 2007, doi: 10.1068/d2506jb. [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000253940600001&site=eds-live&scope=site
[60]
N. Mirzoeff, ‘Introduction: For Critical Visuality Studies [IN] The Visual Culture Reader’, in The visual culture reader, 3rd ed., Abingdon, Oxon [England]: Routledge, 2013.
[61]
J. Weldes and C. Rowley, ‘So, how does popular culture relate to world politics? [IN] Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies’, in Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies, Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing, 2015, pp. 11–34 [Online]. Available: http://www.e-ir.info/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Pop-Culture-and-World-Politics-E-IR.pdf
[62]
Paul Messaris, Visual ‘literacy’. Boulder: Westview Press, 1994 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/fulcrum.0r967441j
[63]
Haraway, D, ‘The persistence of vision [IN] The Visual Culture Reader’, in The visual culture reader, 3rd ed., Abingdon, Oxon [England]: Routledge, 2013.
[64]
Jean Baudrillard, ‘Photography, Or The Writing Of Light’, CTheory, pp. 4-12/2000, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14605/5462
[65]
Ranciere, J, ‘Notes on the photographic image [IN] The Visual Culture Reader’, in The visual culture reader, 3rd ed., Abingdon, Oxon [England]: Routledge, 2013.
[66]
C. Metz, ‘Photography and Fetish’, October, vol. 34, Autumn 1985, doi: 10.2307/778490.
[67]
R. Bleiker, ‘Pluralist Methods for Visual Global Politics’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 872–890, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1177/0305829815583084. [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0305829815583084
[68]
‘Review of International Studies’, vol. 35, no. 4, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/i40025355
[69]
‘Vicki Squire: 12 days in Lampedusa: The potential and perils of a photo essay @FocaalBlog’. [Online]. Available: http://www.focaalblog.com/2016/01/11/vicki-squire-12-days-in-lampedusa-the-potential-and-perils-of-a-photo-essay/
[70]
D. Lisle and H. L. Johnson, ‘Lost in the aftermath’, Security Dialogue, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0967010618762271. [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0967010618762271
[71]
G. Rose and D. P. Tolia-Kelly, Visuality/materiality: images, objects and practices. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315547930
[72]
G. Rose, Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials, 4th edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2016.
[73]
Latham, Alan, ‘Research, performance, and doing human geography: some reflections on the diary-photograph, diary-interview method.’, Environment & Planning A., vol. 35, no. Issue 11, pp. 1993–2017, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eih&AN=11838882&site=eds-live&scope=site
[74]
L. HANSEN, ‘How images make world politics: International icons and the case of Abu Ghraib’, Review of International Studies, vol. 41, no. 02, pp. 263–288, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1017/S0260210514000199.
[75]
Hansen, Lene, ‘Reading Comics for the Field of International Relations: Theory, Method and the Bosnian War’, European Journal of International Relations, pp. 581–608, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ecn&AN=1669716&site=eds-live&scope=site
[76]
W. A. Callahan, ‘The Visual Turn in IR: Documentary Filmmaking as a Critical Method’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 891–910, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1177/0305829815578767.
[77]
D. Campbell, ‘Geopolitics and visuality: Sighting the Darfur conflict’, Political Geography, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 357–382, May 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.11.005.
[78]
Michael J. Shapiro, Cinematic Geopolitics, 1st ed. Taylor & Francis Group, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=362260
[79]
Shepherd, Laura J., ‘Aesthetics, Ethics, and Visual Research in the Digital Age: "Undone in the Face of the Otter’’, MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES;, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0305829816684255. [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000394792800007&site=eds-live&scope=site
[80]
L. T. Smith, ‘Introduction [IN] Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples’, in Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples, Second edition., London: Zed Books, 2012, pp. 30–56 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=29&docID=1426837&tm=1543416913061
[81]
L. T. Smith, ‘Chapter 12 Getting the Story Right, Telling the Story Well: Indigenous Activism, Indigenous Research [IN] Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples’, in Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples, Second edition., London: Zed Books, 2012, pp. 343–359 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=342&docID=1426837&tm=1543417016202
[82]
A. Sayad, P. Bourdieu, and D. Macey, The suffering of the immigrant. Cambridge, England: Polity, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=5326885
[83]
M. Mamdani, Define and Rule: Native as Political Identity. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt2jbqkf
[84]
A. Gupta and J. Ferguson, ‘The Field as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology [IN] Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science’, in Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science, Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 1997.
[85]
Bhambra, Gurminder K., ‘Brexit, Trump, and "methodological whiteness’: on the misrecognition of race and class’, BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY;, 2017, doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12317. [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000414748200010&site=eds-live&scope=site
[86]
J. Borneman and A. Hammoudi, ‘The Fieldwork Encounter, Experience, and the Making of Truth: An Introduction [IN] Being there: the fieldwork encounter and the making of truth.’, in Being There: the Fieldwork Encounter and the Making of Truth, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pphf4
[87]
Kirin Narayan, ‘How Native Is a “Native” Anthropologist?’, American Anthropologist, vol. 95, no. 3, 1993 [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/679656?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[88]
‘A Passage to Britain - BBC’. [Online]. Available: https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/playlists/183729
[89]
E. W. Said, Orientalism, Reprint with a new preface. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2003.
[90]
E. W. Said, Culture and imperialism, Vintage paperback ed. London: Vintage, 1994 [Online]. Available: https://app.kortext.com/borrow/365518
[91]
F. Fanon, Black skin, white masks, [New ed.]. London: Pluto Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781849644532
[92]
G. C. Spivak, In other worlds: essays in cultural politics. New York: Routledge, 1988.
[93]
H. K. Bhabha, The location of culture, [New ed.]. London: Routledge, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781136751042
[94]
R. Young, Postcolonialism: an historical introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.
[95]
C. Lamont, ‘Chapter 4 Writing a Literature Review [IN] Research methods in international relations’, in Research methods in international relations, London: SAGE, 2015, pp. 64–76 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2f0a4927-bffe-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[96]
D. Ridley, The literature review: a step-by-step guide for students, 2nd ed. London: SAGE, 2012.
[97]
C. Hart, Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination, 2nd edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2018.
[98]
R. Andrews, Research questions. London: Continuum, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781441106766
[99]
Hancke, Bob, ‘Chapter 11: The challenge of research design [IN] Theory and Methods in Political Science’, in Theory and methods in political science, 3rd ed., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780230366640
[100]
Benjamin Baez, ‘Confidentiality in qualitative research: reflections on secrets, power and agency.’, Qualitative Research., vol. 2, no. Issue 1, pp. 35–58, 2002, doi: 10.1177/1468794102002001638. [Online]. Available: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=9773574&site=eds-live&scope=site
[101]
M. Bulmer, Social research ethics: an examination of the merits of covert participant observation. London: Macmillan, 1982.
[102]
K. Etherington, ‘Ethical Research in Reflexive Relationships’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 599–616, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1177/1077800407301175.
[103]
D. Hobbs and R. Wright, The SAGE handbook of fieldwork. London: SAGE, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-sage-handbook-of-fieldwork
[104]
R. Homan, ‘The Ethics of Open Methods’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 43, no. 3, Sep. 1992, doi: 10.2307/591538.
[105]
C. Lamont, ‘Chapter 2 Research questions and Research Design [IN] Research methods in international relations’, in Research methods in international relations, London: SAGE, 2015, pp. 30–48.
[106]
S. Halperin and O. Heath, Political research: methods and practical skills, Second edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017.
[107]
D. Marsh and G. Stoker, Theory and methods in political science, 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780230366640
[108]
‘Introduction and Chapter 1 [IN] Research Methods in Politics’, in Research methods in politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
