1.
Kurki, M, Wright, C. International Relations and Social Science [IN] International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford University Press; 2006.
2.
Lamont C. Chapter 1 Research Methods in International relations [IN] Research methods in international relations. In: Research Methods in International Relations. SAGE; 2015:13-29.
3.
Kurki M. Chapter 1 [IN] Causation in international relations: reclaiming causal analysis. In: Causation in International Relations. Cambridge University Press; 2008. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511491481
4.
Jackson PT. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. Routledge; 2011. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315731360
5.
Lebow RN. Constructing Cause in International Relations. Cambridge University Press; 2014. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107256538
6.
Klotz A, Prakash D. Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780230584129
7.
Hollis M, Smith SM. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Clarendon; 1990.
8.
Little R. International Relations and the Methodological Turn. Political Studies. 1991;39(3):463-478. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb01623.x
9.
Grix, Jonathan. Introducing Students to the Generic Terminology of Social Research. Politics. 2002;22(Issue 3). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=7317022&site=eds-live&scope=site
10.
Bonditti P, Neal A, Opitz S, Zebrowski C. Geneaology [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. In: Critical Security Methods: New Frameworks for Analysis. Routledge; 2015:159-188. https://shibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&target=https%3A%2F%2Fshibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net%2Fshib%3Fdest%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.vlebooks.com%252FSHIBBOLETH%253Fdest%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.vlebooks.com%25252Fvleweb%25252Fproduct%25252Fopenreader%25253Fid%25253DExeter%252526isbn%25253D9781134716197
11.
Aradau, ClaudiaRens van Munster. Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations. 13:89-115. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/211984815?accountid=10792
12.
Moon, C. Narrating Political Reconciliation: Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Social & Legal Studies. Published online 2006. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/solestu15&id=253
13.
ANDREW W. NEAL. Foucault in Guantánamo: Towards an Archaeology of the Exception. Security Dialogue. 2006;37(1):31-46. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.26299471&site=eds-live&scope=site
14.
VUCETIC S. Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 2011;37(03):1295-1312. doi:10.1017/S0260210510000938
15.
Howarth DR. Discourse. Open University Press; 2000. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780335231836
16.
Milliken, Jennifer. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations. 5(Issue 2). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=4543934&site=eds-live&scope=site
17.
Aradau, Claudia. Genealogy [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. In: Full Details and Actions for Critical Security Methods: New Frameworks for Analysis. Routledge; 2014. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/Product/Index/424456?page=0
18.
Aradau, Claudia. Visuality [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. In: Full Details and Actions for Critical Security Methods: New Frameworks for Analysis. Routledge; 2014. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/Product/Index/424456?page=0
19.
Dean M. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. 2nd ed. SAGE; 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781446205747
20.
Aradau, Claudia; Rens van Munster. Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations. 13:89-115. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/211984815?accountid=10792
21.
Jeremy Walker; Melinda Cooper. Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security. 2011;42(2):143-160. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.26301757&site=eds-live&scope=site
22.
Iraq Inquiry - Sir John Chilcot’s public statement, 6 July 2016. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20171123124608/http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/the-inquiry/sir-john-chilcots-public-statement/
23.
Tony Blair statement in response to The Report of the Iraq Inquiry. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chilcot-report-tony-blair-read-response-statement-in-full-iraq-war-inquiry-a7123251.html
24.
Anderson B. Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography. 2010;34(6):777-798. doi:10.1177/0309132510362600
25.
Blix H. Disarming Iraq. [Updated edition with a new chapter]. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2005.
26.
Farson AS, Phythian M. Chapter 4 The Politics of Commissions of Inquiry into Security and Intelligence Controversies in Britain [IN] Commissions of Inquiry and National Security. In: Commissions of Inquiry and National Security: Comparative Approaches. Praeger Security International; 2011. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780313384691
27.
Phythian, Mark. Policing Uncertainty: Intelligence, Security and Risk. Intelligence & National Security. 2012;27(Issue 2):187-205. doi:10.1080/02684527.2012.661642
28.
Ralph, Jason. After Chilcot: the ‘doctrine of international community’ and the UK decision to invade Iraq. Journal of Politics & International Relations. 2011;13(3). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ich&AN=ICHA981628&site=eds-live&scope=site
29.
Thomas OD. Good faith and (dis)honest mistakes? Learning from Britain’s Iraq War Inquiry. Politics. 2017;37(4):371-385. doi:10.1177/0263395716688488
30.
Zalewski M. Feminist International Relations: Making sense ... [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. In: Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. 2nd ed. Taylor & Francis; 2014:3-13. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=32&docID=1744166&tm=1543402809598
31.
J. Ann Tickner. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 1997;41(4). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855
32.
Enloe C. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. 2nd ed. University of California Press; 2014. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt6wqbn6
33.
Hutchings, Kimberly. 1988 and 1998: Contrast and continuity in feminist international relations. MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES. Published online 2008. doi:10.1177/0305829808093732
34.
Zalewski M, Parpart JL. ‘Introduction: From the "Woman” Question to the "Man” Question in International Relations’ [IN] The "Man” Question in International Relations. In: The ‘man’ Question in International Relations. Westview Press; 1998.
35.
Adam Jones. Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 1996;22(4):405-429. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.20097459&site=eds-live&scope=site
36.
Peterson VS. Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations Theory. Lynne Rienner; 1992.
37.
V. Spike Peterson. Global Gender Issues. Westview Press; 1999.
38.
Jan Jindy Pettman. Worlding Women : A Feminist International Politics. 1st ed. Routledge; 1996. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=254158
39.
Riley RL, Mohanty CT, Pratt MB. Feminism and War: Confronting US Imperialism. Zed; 2008. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781848133662
40.
Zalewski M. ‘Well, what is the feminist perspective on Bosnia?’ International Affairs. 1995;71(2):339-356. doi:10.2307/2623438
41.
Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires. Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review of International Studies. 1998;24(2). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
42.
Hansen L. Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. In: Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. 2nd ed. Taylor & Francis; 2014:14-23. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=43&docID=1744166&tm=1543415143648
43.
Hansen L. Gender, Nation, Rape: Bosnia and the Construction of Security. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2000;3(1):55-75. doi:10.1080/14616740010019848
44.
Ackerly BA, Stern M, True J. Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. [1st ed.]. Cambridge University Press; 2006. http://encore.exeter.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2555274
45.
Enloe C. III ‘Gender’ is not enough: the need for a feminist consciousness. International Affairs. 2004;80(1):95-97. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00370.x
46.
Letherby G. Feminist Research in Theory and Practice. Open University Press; 2003. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780335226160
47.
Review by: R. Charli Carpenter. Review: Gender Theory in World Politics: Contributions of a Nonfeminist Standpoint? International Studies Review. 2002;4(3). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3186468?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
48.
Ribbens McCarthy J, Edwards R. Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: Public Knowledge and Private Lives. SAGE; 1998. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://methods.sagepub.com/book/feminist-dilemmas-in-qualitative-research
49.
Jones A, Taylor & Francis. Gender Inclusive: Essays on Violence, Men, and Feminist International Relations. Vol 68. Routledge; 2009. http://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&redirectUri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.taylorfrancis.com%2Fbooks%2F9780203887097
50.
Zalewski, Marysia. Feminism after Postmodernism : Theorising through Practice. London : Routledge, 2000.
51.
Blanchard EM. Gender, International Relations, and the Development of Feminist Security Theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 2003;28(4):1289-1312. doi:10.1086/368328
52.
Koo, KL. Confronting a disciplinary blindness: Women, war and rape in the international politics of security. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE;. Published online 2002. doi:10.1080/1036114022000032744
53.
Rowley C. Popular culture and the politics of the visual [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. In: Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. 2nd ed. Taylor & Francis; 2014. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=1744166
54.
Bleiker, R. The Power of Images in Global Politics. Published 2018. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/03/08/the-power-of-images-in-global-politics/
55.
ALEX DANCHEV and DEBBIE LISLE. Introduction: art, politics, purpose. Review of International Studies. 2009;35(4). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40588073?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
56.
Moore, Cerwyn; Shepherd, Laura J. Aesthetics and International Relations: Towards a Global Politics. Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations. 2010;24(Issue 3):299-309. doi:10.1080/13600826.2010.485564
57.
Schlag G, Geis A. Visualizing violence: aesthetics and ethics in international politics. Global Discourse. 2017;7(2-3):193-200. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1359995
58.
FRANK MÖLLER. The looking/not looking dilemma. Review of International Studies. 2009;35(4). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40588074?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
59.
Butler, Judith. Torture and the ethics of photography. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY &. Published online 2007. doi:10.1068/d2506jb
60.
Mirzoeff N. Introduction: For Critical Visuality Studies [IN] The Visual Culture Reader. In: The Visual Culture Reader. 3rd ed. Routledge; 2013.
61.
Weldes J, Rowley C. So, how does popular culture relate to world politics? [IN] Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies. In: Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies. E-International Relations Publishing; 2015:11-34. http://www.e-ir.info/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Pop-Culture-and-World-Politics-E-IR.pdf
62.
Paul Messaris. Visual ‘Literacy’. Westview Press; 1994. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/fulcrum.0r967441j
63.
Haraway, D. The persistence of vision [IN] The Visual Culture Reader. In: The Visual Culture Reader. 3rd ed. Routledge; 2013.
64.
Jean Baudrillard. Photography, Or The Writing Of Light. CTheory. Published online 2000:4-12/2000. https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14605/5462
65.
Ranciere, J. Notes on the photographic image [IN] The Visual Culture Reader. In: The Visual Culture Reader. 3rd ed. Routledge; 2013.
66.
Metz C. Photography and Fetish. October. 1985;34. doi:10.2307/778490
67.
Bleiker R. Pluralist Methods for Visual Global Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2015;43(3):872-890. doi:10.1177/0305829815583084
68.
Review of International Studies. 2009;35(4). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/i40025355
69.
Vicki Squire: 12 days in Lampedusa: The potential and perils of a photo essay @FocaalBlog. http://www.focaalblog.com/2016/01/11/vicki-squire-12-days-in-lampedusa-the-potential-and-perils-of-a-photo-essay/
70.
Lisle D, Johnson HL. Lost in the aftermath. Security Dialogue. Published online 2 April 2018. doi:10.1177/0967010618762271
71.
Rose G, Tolia-Kelly DP. Visuality/Materiality: Images, Objects and Practices. Ashgate; 2012. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315547930
72.
Rose G. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. 4th edition. SAGE; 2016.
73.
Latham, Alan. Research, performance, and doing human geography: some reflections on the diary-photograph, diary-interview method. Environment & Planning A. 2003;35(Issue 11):1993-2017. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eih&AN=11838882&site=eds-live&scope=site
74.
HANSEN L. How images make world politics: International icons and the case of Abu Ghraib. Review of International Studies. 2015;41(02):263-288. doi:10.1017/S0260210514000199
75.
Hansen, Lene. Reading Comics for the Field of International Relations: Theory, Method and the Bosnian War. European Journal of International Relations,. Published online 2017:581-608. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ecn&AN=1669716&site=eds-live&scope=site
76.
Callahan WA. The Visual Turn in IR: Documentary Filmmaking as a Critical Method. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2015;43(3):891-910. doi:10.1177/0305829815578767
77.
Campbell D. Geopolitics and visuality: Sighting the Darfur conflict. Political Geography. 2007;26(4):357-382. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.11.005
78.
Michael J. Shapiro. Cinematic Geopolitics. 1st ed. Taylor & Francis Group; 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=362260
79.
Shepherd, Laura J. Aesthetics, Ethics, and Visual Research in the Digital Age: "Undone in the Face of the Otter’. MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES;. Published online 2017. doi:10.1177/0305829816684255
80.
Smith LT. Introduction [IN] Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. In: Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Second edition. Zed Books; 2012:30-56. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=29&docID=1426837&tm=1543416913061
81.
Smith LT. Chapter 12 Getting the Story Right, Telling the Story Well: Indigenous Activism, Indigenous Research [IN] Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. In: Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Second edition. Zed Books; 2012:343-359. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=342&docID=1426837&tm=1543417016202
82.
Sayad A, Bourdieu P, Macey D. The Suffering of the Immigrant. Polity; 2004. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=5326885
83.
Mamdani M. Define and Rule: Native as Political Identity. Harvard University Press; 2012. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt2jbqkf
84.
Gupta A, Ferguson J. The Field as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology [IN] Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science. In: Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. University of California Press; 1997.
85.
Bhambra, Gurminder K. Brexit, Trump, and "methodological whiteness’: on the misrecognition of race and class. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY;. Published online 2017. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12317
86.
Borneman J, Hammoudi A. The Fieldwork Encounter, Experience, and the Making of Truth: An Introduction [IN] Being there: the fieldwork encounter and the making of truth. In: Being There: The Fieldwork Encounter and the Making of Truth. University of California Press; 2009. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pphf4
87.
Kirin Narayan. How Native Is a ‘Native’ Anthropologist? American Anthropologist. 1993;95(3). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/679656?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
88.
A Passage to Britain - BBC. https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/playlists/183729
89.
Said EW. Orientalism. reprint with a new preface. Penguin; 2003.
90.
Said EW. Culture and Imperialism. Vintage paperback ed. Vintage; 1994. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/365518
91.
Fanon F. Black Skin, White Masks. [New ed.]. Pluto Press; 2008. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781849644532
92.
Spivak GC. In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. Routledge; 1988.
93.
Bhabha HK. The Location of Culture. [New ed.]. Routledge; 2004. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781136751042
94.
Young R. Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. Blackwell; 2001.
95.
Lamont C. Chapter 4 Writing a Literature Review [IN] Research methods in international relations. In: Research Methods in International Relations. SAGE; 2015:64-76. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2f0a4927-bffe-e811-80cd-005056af4099
96.
Ridley D. The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students. 2nd ed. SAGE; 2012.
97.
Hart C. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. 2nd edition. SAGE; 2018.
98.
Andrews R. Research Questions. Continuum; 2003. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781441106766
99.
Hancke, Bob. Chapter 11: The challenge of research design [IN] Theory and Methods in Political Science. In: Theory and Methods in Political Science. 3rd ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2010. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780230366640
100.
Benjamin Baez. Confidentiality in qualitative research: reflections on secrets, power and agency. Qualitative Research. 2002;2(Issue 1):35-58. doi:10.1177/1468794102002001638
101.
Bulmer M. Social Research Ethics: An Examination of the Merits of Covert Participant Observation. Macmillan; 1982.
102.
Etherington K. Ethical Research in Reflexive Relationships. Qualitative Inquiry. 2007;13(5):599-616. doi:10.1177/1077800407301175
103.
Hobbs D, Wright R. The SAGE Handbook of Fieldwork. SAGE; 2006. http://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-sage-handbook-of-fieldwork
104.
Homan R. The Ethics of Open Methods. The British Journal of Sociology. 1992;43(3). doi:10.2307/591538
105.
Lamont C. Chapter 2 Research questions and Research Design [IN] Research methods in international relations. In: Research Methods in International Relations. SAGE; 2015:30-48.
106.
Halperin S, Heath O. Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
107.
Marsh D, Stoker G. Theory and Methods in Political Science. 3rd ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780230366640
108.
Introduction and Chapter 1 [IN] Research Methods in Politics. In: Research Methods in Politics. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
