1
Kurki, M, Wright, C. International Relations and Social Science [IN] International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006.
2
Lamont C. Chapter 1 Research Methods in International relations [IN] Research methods in international relations. In: Research methods in international relations. London: : SAGE 2015. 13–29.
3
Kurki M. Chapter 1 [IN] Causation in international relations: reclaiming causal analysis. In: Causation in International Relations. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511491481
4
Jackson PT. The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. London: : Routledge 2011. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315731360
5
Lebow RN. Constructing Cause in International Relations. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2014. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107256538
6
Klotz A, Prakash D. Qualitative methods in international relations: a pluralist guide. Basingstoke [England]: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780230584129
7
Hollis M, Smith SM. Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford: : Clarendon 1990.
8
Little R. International Relations and the Methodological Turn. Political Studies 1991;39:463–78. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb01623.x
9
Grix, Jonathan. Introducing Students to the Generic Terminology of Social Research. Politics 2002;22.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=7317022&site=eds-live&scope=site
10
Bonditti P, Neal A, Opitz S, et al. Geneaology [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. In: Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. London: : Routledge 2015. 159–88.https://shibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&target=https%3A%2F%2Fshibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net%2Fshib%3Fdest%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.vlebooks.com%252FSHIBBOLETH%253Fdest%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.vlebooks.com%25252Fvleweb%25252Fproduct%25252Fopenreader%25253Fid%25253DExeter%252526isbn%25253D9781134716197
11
Aradau, ClaudiaRens van Munster. Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations;13:89–115.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/211984815?accountid=10792
12
Moon, C. Narrating Political Reconciliation: Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Social & Legal Studies Published Online First: 2006.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/solestu15&id=253
13
ANDREW W. NEAL. Foucault in Guantánamo: Towards an Archaeology of the Exception. Security Dialogue 2006;37:31–46.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.26299471&site=eds-live&scope=site
14
VUCETIC S. Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies 2011;37:1295–312. doi:10.1017/S0260210510000938
15
Howarth DR. Discourse. Buckingham: : Open University Press 2000. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780335231836
16
Milliken, Jennifer. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations;5.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=4543934&site=eds-live&scope=site
17
Aradau, Claudia. Genealogy [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. In: Full details and actions for Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Routledge 2014. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/Product/Index/424456?page=0
18
Aradau, Claudia. Visuality [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. In: Full details and actions for Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Routledge 2014. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/Product/Index/424456?page=0
19
Dean M. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: : SAGE 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781446205747
20
Aradau, Claudia; Rens van Munster. Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations;13:89–115.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/211984815?accountid=10792
21
Jeremy Walker; Melinda Cooper. Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security 2011;42:143–60.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.26301757&site=eds-live&scope=site
22
Iraq Inquiry - Sir John Chilcot’s public statement, 6 July 2016. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20171123124608/http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/the-inquiry/sir-john-chilcots-public-statement/
23
Tony Blair statement in response to The Report of the Iraq Inquiry. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chilcot-report-tony-blair-read-response-statement-in-full-iraq-war-inquiry-a7123251.html
24
Anderson B. Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography 2010;34:777–98. doi:10.1177/0309132510362600
25
Blix H. Disarming Iraq. [Updated edition with a new chapter]. London: : Bloomsbury Publishing 2005.
26
Farson AS, Phythian M. Chapter 4 The Politics of Commissions of Inquiry into Security and Intelligence Controversies in Britain [IN] Commissions of Inquiry and National Security. In: Commissions of inquiry and national security: comparative approaches. Santa Barbara, Calif: : Praeger Security International 2011. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780313384691
27
Phythian, Mark. Policing Uncertainty: Intelligence, Security and Risk. Intelligence & National Security 2012;27:187–205. doi:10.1080/02684527.2012.661642
28
Ralph, Jason. After Chilcot: the ‘doctrine of international community’ and the UK decision to invade Iraq. Journal of Politics & International Relations 2011;13.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ich&AN=ICHA981628&site=eds-live&scope=site
29
Thomas OD. Good faith and (dis)honest mistakes? Learning from Britain’s Iraq War Inquiry. Politics 2017;37:371–85. doi:10.1177/0263395716688488
30
Zalewski M. Feminist International Relations: Making sense ... [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. In: Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. New York: : Taylor & Francis 2014. 3–13.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=32&docID=1744166&tm=1543402809598
31
J. Ann Tickner. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly 1997;41.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855
32
Enloe C. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. 2nd ed. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2014. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt6wqbn6
33
Hutchings, Kimberly. 1988 and 1998: Contrast and continuity in feminist international relations. MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES Published Online First: 2008. doi:10.1177/0305829808093732
34
Zalewski M, Parpart JL. ‘Introduction: From the "Woman” Question to the "Man” Question in International Relations’ [IN] The "Man” Question in International Relations. In: The ‘man’ question in international relations. Boulder, Colorado: : Westview Press 1998.
35
Adam Jones. Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies 1996;22:405–29.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.20097459&site=eds-live&scope=site
36
Peterson VS. Gendered states: feminist (re)visions of international relations theory. Boulder, Colo: : Lynne Rienner 1992.
37
V. Spike Peterson. Global gender issues. Boulder, CO: : Westview Press 1999.
38
Jan Jindy Pettman. Worlding Women : A Feminist International Politics. 1st ed. Routledge 1996. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=254158
39
Riley RL, Mohanty CT, Pratt MB. Feminism and war: confronting US imperialism. London: : Zed 2008. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781848133662
40
Zalewski M. ‘Well, what is the feminist perspective on Bosnia?’ International Affairs 1995;71:339–56. doi:10.2307/2623438
41
Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires. Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review of International Studies 1998;24.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
42
Hansen L. Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. In: Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. New York: : Taylor & Francis 2014. 14–23.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=43&docID=1744166&tm=1543415143648
43
Hansen L. Gender, Nation, Rape: Bosnia and the Construction of Security. International Feminist Journal of Politics 2000;3:55–75. doi:10.1080/14616740010019848
44
Ackerly BA, Stern M, True J. Feminist methodologies for international relations. [1st ed.]. Cambridge, UK: : Cambridge University Press 2006. http://encore.exeter.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2555274
45
Enloe C. III ‘Gender’ is not enough: the need for a feminist consciousness. International Affairs 2004;80:95–7. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00370.x
46
Letherby G. Feminist research in theory and practice. Buckingham: : Open University Press 2003. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780335226160
47
Review by: R. Charli Carpenter. Review: Gender Theory in World Politics: Contributions of a Nonfeminist Standpoint? International Studies Review 2002;4.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3186468?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
48
Ribbens McCarthy J, Edwards R. Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: public knowledge and private lives. London: : SAGE 1998. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://methods.sagepub.com/book/feminist-dilemmas-in-qualitative-research
49
Jones A, Taylor & Francis. Gender inclusive: essays on violence, men, and feminist international relations. London: : Routledge 2009. http://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&redirectUri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.taylorfrancis.com%2Fbooks%2F9780203887097
50
Zalewski, Marysia. Feminism after postmodernism : theorising through practice. London : Routledge, 2000.
51
Blanchard EM. Gender, International Relations, and the Development of Feminist Security Theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 2003;28:1289–312. doi:10.1086/368328
52
Koo, KL. Confronting a disciplinary blindness: Women, war and rape in the international politics of security. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE; Published Online First: 2002. doi:10.1080/1036114022000032744
53
Rowley C. Popular culture and the politics of the visual [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. In: Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. New York: : Taylor & Francis 2014. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=1744166
54
Bleiker, R. The Power of Images in Global Politics. 2018.https://www.e-ir.info/2018/03/08/the-power-of-images-in-global-politics/
55
ALEX DANCHEV and DEBBIE LISLE. Introduction: art, politics, purpose. Review of International Studies 2009;35.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40588073?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
56
Moore, Cerwyn; Shepherd, Laura J. Aesthetics and International Relations: Towards a Global Politics. Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations 2010;24:299–309. doi:10.1080/13600826.2010.485564
57
Schlag G, Geis A. Visualizing violence: aesthetics and ethics in international politics. Global Discourse 2017;7:193–200. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1359995
58
FRANK MÖLLER. The looking/not looking dilemma. Review of International Studies 2009;35.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40588074?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
59
Butler, Judith. Torture and the ethics of photography. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY & Published Online First: 2007. doi:10.1068/d2506jb
60
Mirzoeff N. Introduction: For Critical Visuality Studies [IN] The Visual Culture Reader. In: The visual culture reader. Abingdon, Oxon [England]: : Routledge 2013.
61
Weldes J, Rowley C. So, how does popular culture relate to world politics? [IN] Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies. In: Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies. Bristol: : E-International Relations Publishing 2015. 11–34.http://www.e-ir.info/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Pop-Culture-and-World-Politics-E-IR.pdf
62
Paul Messaris. Visual ‘literacy’. Boulder: : Westview Press 1994. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/fulcrum.0r967441j
63
Haraway, D. The persistence of vision [IN] The Visual Culture Reader. In: The visual culture reader. Abingdon, Oxon [England]: : Routledge 2013.
64
Jean Baudrillard. Photography, Or The Writing Of Light. CTheory 2000;:4-12/2000.https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14605/5462
65
Ranciere, J. Notes on the photographic image [IN] The Visual Culture Reader. In: The visual culture reader. Abingdon, Oxon [England]: : Routledge 2013.
66
Metz C. Photography and Fetish. October 1985;34. doi:10.2307/778490
67
Bleiker R. Pluralist Methods for Visual Global Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2015;43:872–90. doi:10.1177/0305829815583084
68
Review of International Studies. 2009;35.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/i40025355
69
Vicki Squire: 12 days in Lampedusa: The potential and perils of a photo essay @FocaalBlog. http://www.focaalblog.com/2016/01/11/vicki-squire-12-days-in-lampedusa-the-potential-and-perils-of-a-photo-essay/
70
Lisle D, Johnson HL. Lost in the aftermath. Security Dialogue Published Online First: 2 April 2018. doi:10.1177/0967010618762271
71
Rose G, Tolia-Kelly DP. Visuality/materiality: images, objects and practices. Farnham: : Ashgate 2012. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315547930
72
Rose G. Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. 4th edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2016.
73
Latham, Alan. Research, performance, and doing human geography: some reflections on the diary-photograph, diary-interview method. Environment & Planning A 2003;35:1993–2017.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eih&AN=11838882&site=eds-live&scope=site
74
HANSEN L. How images make world politics: International icons and the case of Abu Ghraib. Review of International Studies 2015;41:263–88. doi:10.1017/S0260210514000199
75
Hansen, Lene. Reading Comics for the Field of International Relations: Theory, Method and the Bosnian War. European Journal of International Relations, 2017;:581–608.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ecn&AN=1669716&site=eds-live&scope=site
76
Callahan WA. The Visual Turn in IR: Documentary Filmmaking as a Critical Method. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2015;43:891–910. doi:10.1177/0305829815578767
77
Campbell D. Geopolitics and visuality: Sighting the Darfur conflict. Political Geography 2007;26:357–82. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.11.005
78
Michael J. Shapiro. Cinematic Geopolitics. 1st ed. Taylor & Francis Group 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=362260
79
Shepherd, Laura J. Aesthetics, Ethics, and Visual Research in the Digital Age: "Undone in the Face of the Otter’. MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES; Published Online First: 2017. doi:10.1177/0305829816684255
80
Smith LT. Introduction [IN] Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. In: Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. London: : Zed Books 2012. 30–56.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=29&docID=1426837&tm=1543416913061
81
Smith LT. Chapter 12 Getting the Story Right, Telling the Story Well: Indigenous Activism, Indigenous Research [IN] Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. In: Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. London: : Zed Books 2012. 343–59.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=342&docID=1426837&tm=1543417016202
82
Sayad A, Bourdieu P, Macey D. The suffering of the immigrant. Cambridge, England: : Polity 2004. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=5326885
83
Mamdani M. Define and Rule: Native as Political Identity. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 2012. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt2jbqkf
84
Gupta A, Ferguson J. The Field as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology [IN] Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science. In: Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 1997.
85
Bhambra, Gurminder K. Brexit, Trump, and "methodological whiteness’: on the misrecognition of race and class. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY; Published Online First: 2017. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12317
86
Borneman J, Hammoudi A. The Fieldwork Encounter, Experience, and the Making of Truth: An Introduction [IN] Being there: the fieldwork encounter and the making of truth. In: Being There: the Fieldwork Encounter and the Making of Truth. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2009. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pphf4
87
Kirin Narayan. How Native Is a ‘Native’ Anthropologist? American Anthropologist 1993;95.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/679656?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
88
A Passage to Britain - BBC. https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/playlists/183729
89
Said EW. Orientalism. reprint with a new preface. Harmondsworth: : Penguin 2003.
90
Said EW. Culture and imperialism. Vintage paperback ed. London: : Vintage 1994. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/365518
91
Fanon F. Black skin, white masks. [New ed.]. London: : Pluto Press 2008. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781849644532
92
Spivak GC. In other worlds: essays in cultural politics. New York: : Routledge 1988.
93
Bhabha HK. The location of culture. [New ed.]. London: : Routledge 2004. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781136751042
94
Young R. Postcolonialism: an historical introduction. Oxford: : Blackwell 2001.
95
Lamont C. Chapter 4 Writing a Literature Review [IN] Research methods in international relations. In: Research methods in international relations. London: : SAGE 2015. 64–76.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2f0a4927-bffe-e811-80cd-005056af4099
96
Ridley D. The literature review: a step-by-step guide for students. 2nd ed. London: : SAGE 2012.
97
Hart C. Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination. 2nd edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2018.
98
Andrews R. Research questions. London: : Continuum 2003. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781441106766
99
Hancke, Bob. Chapter 11: The challenge of research design [IN] Theory and Methods in Political Science. In: Theory and methods in political science. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2010. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780230366640
100
Benjamin Baez. Confidentiality in qualitative research: reflections on secrets, power and agency. Qualitative Research 2002;2:35–58. doi:10.1177/1468794102002001638
101
Bulmer M. Social research ethics: an examination of the merits of covert participant observation. London: : Macmillan 1982.
102
Etherington K. Ethical Research in Reflexive Relationships. Qualitative Inquiry 2007;13:599–616. doi:10.1177/1077800407301175
103
Hobbs D, Wright R. The SAGE handbook of fieldwork. London: : SAGE 2006. http://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-sage-handbook-of-fieldwork
104
Homan R. The Ethics of Open Methods. The British Journal of Sociology 1992;43. doi:10.2307/591538
105
Lamont C. Chapter 2 Research questions and Research Design [IN] Research methods in international relations. In: Research methods in international relations. London: : SAGE 2015. 30–48.
106
Halperin S, Heath O. Political research: methods and practical skills. Second edition. New York, NY: : Oxford University Press 2017.
107
Marsh D, Stoker G. Theory and methods in political science. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780230366640
108
Introduction and Chapter 1 [IN] Research Methods in Politics. In: Research methods in politics. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008.
