A Passage to Britain - BBC. (n.d.). https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/playlists/183729
Ackerly, B. A., Stern, M., & True, J. (2006). Feminist methodologies for international relations ([1st ed.]). Cambridge University Press. http://encore.exeter.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2555274
Adam Jones. (1996). Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies, 22(4), 405–429. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.20097459&site=eds-live&scope=site
ALEX DANCHEV and DEBBIE LISLE. (2009). Introduction: art, politics, purpose. Review of International Studies, 35(4). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40588073?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Anderson, B. (2010). Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 777–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362600
ANDREW W. NEAL. (2006). Foucault in Guantánamo: Towards an Archaeology of the Exception. Security Dialogue, 37(1), 31–46. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.26299471&site=eds-live&scope=site
Andrews, R. (2003). Research questions. Continuum. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781441106766
Aradau, Claudia. (2014a). Genealogy [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. In Full details and actions for Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Routledge. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/Product/Index/424456?page=0
Aradau, Claudia. (2014b). Visuality [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. In Full details and actions for Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Routledge. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/Product/Index/424456?page=0
Aradau, Claudia; Rens van Munster. (n.d.). Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations, 13, 89–115. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/211984815?accountid=10792
Aradau, ClaudiaRens van Munster. (n.d.). Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations, 13, 89–115. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/211984815?accountid=10792
Benjamin Baez. (2002). Confidentiality in qualitative research: reflections on secrets, power and agency. Qualitative Research., 2(Issue 1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001638
Bhabha, H. K. (2004). The location of culture ([New ed.]). Routledge. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781136751042
Bhambra, Gurminder K. (2017). Brexit, Trump, and "methodological whiteness’: on the misrecognition of race and class. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY; https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12317
Blanchard, E. M. (2003). Gender, International Relations, and the Development of Feminist Security Theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(4), 1289–1312. https://doi.org/10.1086/368328
Bleiker, R. (2015). Pluralist Methods for Visual Global Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(3), 872–890. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815583084
Bleiker, R. (2018). The Power of Images in Global Politics. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/03/08/the-power-of-images-in-global-politics/
Blix, H. (2005). Disarming Iraq ([Updated edition with a new chapter]). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Bonditti, P., Neal, A., Opitz, S., & Zebrowski, C. (2015). Geneaology [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. In Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis (pp. 159–188). Routledge. https://shibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&target=https%3A%2F%2Fshibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net%2Fshib%3Fdest%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.vlebooks.com%252FSHIBBOLETH%253Fdest%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.vlebooks.com%25252Fvleweb%25252Fproduct%25252Fopenreader%25253Fid%25253DExeter%252526isbn%25253D9781134716197
Borneman, J., & Hammoudi, A. (2009). The Fieldwork Encounter, Experience, and the Making of Truth: An Introduction [IN] Being there: the fieldwork encounter and the making of truth. In Being There: the Fieldwork Encounter and the Making of Truth. University of California Press. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pphf4
Bulmer, M. (1982). Social research ethics: an examination of the merits of covert participant observation. Macmillan.
Butler, Judith. (2007). Torture and the ethics of photography. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY &. https://doi.org/10.1068/d2506jb
Callahan, W. A. (2015). The Visual Turn in IR: Documentary Filmmaking as a Critical Method. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(3), 891–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815578767
Campbell, D. (2007). Geopolitics and visuality: Sighting the Darfur conflict. Political Geography, 26(4), 357–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.11.005
Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: power and rule in modern society (2nd ed). SAGE. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781446205747
Enloe, C. (2004). III ‘Gender’ is not enough: the need for a feminist consciousness. International Affairs, 80(1), 95–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00370.x
Enloe, C. (2014). Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics (2nd ed). University of California Press. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt6wqbn6
Etherington, K. (2007). Ethical Research in Reflexive Relationships. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(5), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407301175
Fanon, F. (2008). Black skin, white masks ([New ed.]). Pluto Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781849644532
Farson, A. S., & Phythian, M. (2011). Chapter 4 The Politics of Commissions of Inquiry into Security and Intelligence Controversies in Britain [IN] Commissions of Inquiry and National Security. In Commissions of inquiry and national security: comparative approaches. Praeger Security International. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780313384691
FRANK MÖLLER. (2009). The looking/not looking dilemma. Review of International Studies, 35(4). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40588074?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Grix, Jonathan. (2002). Introducing Students to the Generic Terminology of Social Research. Politics., 22(Issue 3). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=7317022&site=eds-live&scope=site
Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997). The Field as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology [IN] Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science. In Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science. University of California Press.
Halperin, S., & Heath, O. (2017). Political research: methods and practical skills (Second edition). Oxford University Press.
Hancke, Bob. (2010). Chapter 11: The challenge of research design [IN] Theory and Methods in Political Science. In Theory and methods in political science (3rd ed). Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780230366640
Hansen, L. (2000). Gender, Nation, Rape: Bosnia and the Construction of Security. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 3(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740010019848
Hansen, L. (2014). Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. In Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations (2nd ed, pp. 14–23). Taylor & Francis. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=43&docID=1744166&tm=1543415143648
HANSEN, L. (2015). How images make world politics: International icons and the case of Abu Ghraib. Review of International Studies, 41(02), 263–288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210514000199
Hansen, Lene. (2017). Reading Comics for the Field of International Relations: Theory, Method and the Bosnian War. European Journal of International Relations, 581–608. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ecn&AN=1669716&site=eds-live&scope=site
Haraway, D. (2013a). The persistence of vision [IN] The Visual Culture Reader. In The visual culture reader (3rd ed). Routledge.
Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination (2nd edition). SAGE.
Hobbs, D., & Wright, R. (2006). The SAGE handbook of fieldwork. SAGE. http://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-sage-handbook-of-fieldwork
Hollis, M., & Smith, S. M. (1990). Explaining and understanding international relations. Clarendon.
Homan, R. (1992). The Ethics of Open Methods. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/591538
Howarth, D. R. (2000). Discourse. Open University Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780335231836
Hutchings, Kimberly. (2008). 1988 and 1998: Contrast and continuity in feminist international relations. MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808093732
Introduction and Chapter 1 [IN] Research Methods in Politics. (2008). In Research methods in politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Iraq Inquiry - Sir John Chilcot’s public statement, 6 July 2016. (n.d.). https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20171123124608/http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/the-inquiry/sir-john-chilcots-public-statement/
J. Ann Tickner. (1997). You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly, 41(4). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855
Jackson, P. T. (2011). The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Routledge. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315731360
Jan Jindy Pettman. (1996). Worlding Women : A Feminist International Politics (1st ed.). Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=254158
Jean Baudrillard. (2000). Photography, Or The Writing Of Light. CTheory, 4-12/2000. https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14605/5462
Jeremy Walker; Melinda Cooper. (2011). Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security, 42(2), 143–160. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.26301757&site=eds-live&scope=site
Jones, A. & Taylor & Francis. (2009). Gender inclusive: essays on violence, men, and feminist international relations (Vol. 68). Routledge. http://www.taylorfrancis.com/start-session?idp=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&redirectUri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.taylorfrancis.com%2Fbooks%2F9780203887097
Kirin Narayan. (1993). How Native Is a ‘Native’ Anthropologist? American Anthropologist, 95(3). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/679656?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Klotz, A., & Prakash, D. (2008). Qualitative methods in international relations: a pluralist guide. Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780230584129
Koo, KL. (2002). Confronting a disciplinary blindness: Women, war and rape in the international politics of security. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE; https://doi.org/10.1080/1036114022000032744
Kurki, M. (2008). Chapter 1 [IN] Causation in international relations: reclaiming causal analysis. In Causation in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491481
Kurki, M, & Wright, C. (2006). International Relations and Social Science [IN] International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. In International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
Lamont, C. (2015a). Chapter 1 Research Methods in International relations [IN] Research methods in international relations. In Research methods in international relations (pp. 13–29). SAGE.
Lamont, C. (2015b). Chapter 2 Research questions and Research Design [IN] Research methods in international relations. In Research methods in international relations (pp. 30–48). SAGE.
Lamont, C. (2015c). Chapter 4 Writing a Literature Review [IN] Research methods in international relations. In Research methods in international relations (pp. 64–76). SAGE. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2f0a4927-bffe-e811-80cd-005056af4099
Latham, Alan. (2003). Research, performance, and doing human geography: some reflections on the diary-photograph, diary-interview method. Environment & Planning A., 35(Issue 11), 1993–2017. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eih&AN=11838882&site=eds-live&scope=site
Lebow, R. N. (2014). Constructing Cause in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107256538
Letherby, G. (2003). Feminist research in theory and practice. Open University Press. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780335226160
Lisle, D., & Johnson, H. L. (2018). Lost in the aftermath. Security Dialogue. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010618762271
Little, R. (1991). International Relations and the Methodological Turn. Political Studies, 39(3), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb01623.x
Mamdani, M. (2012). Define and Rule: Native as Political Identity. Harvard University Press. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt2jbqkf
Marsh, D., & Stoker, G. (2010). Theory and methods in political science (3rd ed). Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780230366640
Metz, C. (1985). Photography and Fetish. October, 34. https://doi.org/10.2307/778490
Michael J. Shapiro. (2008). Cinematic Geopolitics (1st ed.). Taylor & Francis Group. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=362260
Milliken, Jennifer. (n.d.). The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations., 5(Issue 2). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=4543934&site=eds-live&scope=site
Mirzoeff, N. (2013). Introduction: For Critical Visuality Studies [IN] The Visual Culture Reader. In The visual culture reader (3rd ed). Routledge.
Moon, C. (2006). Narrating Political Reconciliation: Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Social & Legal Studies. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/solestu15&id=253
Moore, Cerwyn; Shepherd, Laura J. (2010). Aesthetics and International Relations: Towards a Global Politics. Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations., 24(Issue 3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2010.485564
Paul Messaris. (1994). Visual ‘literacy’. Westview Press. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/fulcrum.0r967441j
Peterson, V. S. (1992). Gendered states: feminist (re)visions of international relations theory. Lynne Rienner.
Phythian, Mark. (2012). Policing Uncertainty: Intelligence, Security and Risk. Intelligence & National Security., 27(Issue 2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2012.661642
Ralph, Jason. (2011). After Chilcot: the ‘doctrine of international community’ and the UK decision to invade Iraq. Journal of Politics & International Relations, 13(3). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ich&AN=ICHA981628&site=eds-live&scope=site
Ranciere, J. (2013b). Notes on the photographic image [IN] The Visual Culture Reader. In The visual culture reader (3rd ed). Routledge.
Review by: R. Charli Carpenter. (2002). Review: Gender Theory in World Politics: Contributions of a Nonfeminist Standpoint? International Studies Review, 4(3). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3186468?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Review of International Studies. (2009). 35(4). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/i40025355
Ribbens McCarthy, J., & Edwards, R. (1998). Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: public knowledge and private lives. SAGE. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://methods.sagepub.com/book/feminist-dilemmas-in-qualitative-research
Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: a step-by-step guide for students (2nd ed). SAGE.
Riley, R. L., Mohanty, C. T., & Pratt, M. B. (2008). Feminism and war: confronting US imperialism. Zed. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781848133662
Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials (4th edition). SAGE.
Rose, G., & Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (2012). Visuality/materiality: images, objects and practices. Ashgate. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315547930
Rowley, C. (2014). Popular culture and the politics of the visual [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. In Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations (2nd ed). Taylor & Francis. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=1744166
Said, E. W. (1994). Culture and imperialism (Vintage paperback ed). Vintage. https://app.kortext.com/borrow/365518
Said, E. W. (2003). Orientalism (reprint with a new preface). Penguin.
Sayad, A., Bourdieu, P., & Macey, D. (2004). The suffering of the immigrant. Polity. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=5326885
Schlag, G., & Geis, A. (2017). Visualizing violence: aesthetics and ethics in international politics. Global Discourse, 7(2–3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2017.1359995
Shepherd, Laura J. (2017). Aesthetics, Ethics, and Visual Research in the Digital Age: "Undone in the Face of the Otter’. MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES; https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816684255
Smith, L. T. (2012a). Chapter 12 Getting the Story Right, Telling the Story Well: Indigenous Activism, Indigenous Research [IN] Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. In Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples (Second edition, pp. 343–359). Zed Books. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=342&docID=1426837&tm=1543417016202
Smith, L. T. (2012b). Introduction [IN] Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. In Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples (Second edition, pp. 30–56). Zed Books. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=29&docID=1426837&tm=1543416913061
Spivak, G. C. (1988). In other worlds: essays in cultural politics. Routledge.
Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires. (1998). Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review of International Studies, 24(2). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Thomas, O. D. (2017). Good faith and (dis)honest mistakes? Learning from Britain’s Iraq War Inquiry. Politics, 37(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395716688488
Tony Blair statement in response to The Report of the Iraq Inquiry. (n.d.). https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chilcot-report-tony-blair-read-response-statement-in-full-iraq-war-inquiry-a7123251.html
V. Spike Peterson. (1999). Global gender issues. Westview Press.
Vicki Squire: 12 days in Lampedusa: The potential and perils of a photo essay @FocaalBlog. (n.d.). http://www.focaalblog.com/2016/01/11/vicki-squire-12-days-in-lampedusa-the-potential-and-perils-of-a-photo-essay/
VUCETIC, S. (2011). Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies, 37(03), 1295–1312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000938
Weldes, J., & Rowley, C. (2015). So, how does popular culture relate to world politics? [IN] Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies. In Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies (pp. 11–34). E-International Relations Publishing. http://www.e-ir.info/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Pop-Culture-and-World-Politics-E-IR.pdf
Young, R. (2001). Postcolonialism: an historical introduction. Blackwell.
Zalewski, M. (1995). ‘Well, what is the feminist perspective on Bosnia?’ International Affairs, 71(2), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/2623438
Zalewski, M. (2014). Feminist International Relations: Making sense ... [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. In Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations (2nd ed, pp. 3–13). Taylor & Francis. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?ppg=32&docID=1744166&tm=1543402809598
Zalewski, M., & Parpart, J. L. (1998). ‘Introduction: From the "Woman” Question to the "Man” Question in International Relations’ [IN] The "Man” Question in International Relations. In The ‘man’ question in international relations. Westview Press.
Zalewski, Marysia. (n.d.). Feminism after postmodernism : theorising through practice. London : Routledge, 2000.
