[1]
Ackerly, B.A. et al. 2006. Feminist methodologies for international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[2]
Adam Jones 1996. Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 22, 4 (1996), 405–429.
[3]
ALEX DANCHEV and DEBBIE LISLE 2009. Introduction: art, politics, purpose. Review of International Studies. 35, 4 (2009).
[4]
Anderson, B. 2010. Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography. 34, 6 (Dec. 2010), 777–798. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362600.
[5]
ANDREW W. NEAL 2006. Foucault in Guantánamo: Towards an Archaeology of the Exception. Security Dialogue. 37, 1 (2006), 31–46.
[6]
Andrews, R. 2003. Research questions. Continuum.
[7]
Aradau, Claudia 2014. Genealogy [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Full details and actions for Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Routledge.
[8]
Aradau, Claudia 2014. Visuality [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Full details and actions for Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Routledge.
[9]
Aradau, Claudia; Rens van Munster Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations. 13, 89–115.
[10]
Aradau, ClaudiaRens van Munster Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations. 13, 89–115.
[11]
Benjamin Baez 2002. Confidentiality in qualitative research: reflections on secrets, power and agency. Qualitative Research. 2, Issue 1 (2002), 35–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794102002001638.
[12]
Bhabha, H.K. 2004. The location of culture. Routledge.
[13]
Bhambra, Gurminder K. 2017. Brexit, Trump, and "methodological whiteness’: on the misrecognition of race and class. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY;. (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12317.
[14]
Blanchard, E.M. 2003. Gender, International Relations, and the Development of Feminist Security Theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 28, 4 (Jun. 2003), 1289–1312. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/368328.
[15]
Bleiker, R. 2015. Pluralist Methods for Visual Global Politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 43, 3 (Jun. 2015), 872–890. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815583084.
[16]
Blix, H. 2005. Disarming Iraq. Bloomsbury Publishing.
[17]
Bonditti, P. et al. 2015. Geneaology [IN] Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Routledge. 159–188.
[18]
Borneman, J. and Hammoudi, A. 2009. The Fieldwork Encounter, Experience, and the Making of Truth: An Introduction [IN] Being there: the fieldwork encounter and the making of truth. Being There: the Fieldwork Encounter and the Making of Truth. University of California Press.
[19]
Bulmer, M. 1982. Social research ethics: an examination of the merits of covert participant observation. Macmillan.
[20]
Butler, Judith 2007. Torture and the ethics of photography. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY &. (2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1068/d2506jb.
[21]
Callahan, W.A. 2015. The Visual Turn in IR: Documentary Filmmaking as a Critical Method. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 43, 3 (Jun. 2015), 891–910. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815578767.
[22]
Campbell, D. 2007. Geopolitics and visuality: Sighting the Darfur conflict. Political Geography. 26, 4 (May 2007), 357–382. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.11.005.
[23]
Dean, M. 2010. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. SAGE.
[24]
Enloe, C. 2014. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. University of California Press.
[25]
Enloe, C. 2004. III ‘Gender’ is not enough: the need for a feminist consciousness. International Affairs. 80, 1 (Jan. 2004), 95–97. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00370.x.
[26]
Etherington, K. 2007. Ethical Research in Reflexive Relationships. Qualitative Inquiry. 13, 5 (Jul. 2007), 599–616. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407301175.
[27]
Fanon, F. 2008. Black skin, white masks. Pluto Press.
[28]
Farson, A.S. and Phythian, M. 2011. Chapter 4 The Politics of Commissions of Inquiry into Security and Intelligence Controversies in Britain [IN] Commissions of Inquiry and National Security. Commissions of inquiry and national security: comparative approaches. Praeger Security International.
[29]
FRANK MÖLLER 2009. The looking/not looking dilemma. Review of International Studies. 35, 4 (2009).
[30]
Grix, Jonathan 2002. Introducing Students to the Generic Terminology of Social Research. Politics. 22, Issue 3 (2002).
[31]
Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. 1997. The Field as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology [IN] Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science. Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science. University of California Press.
[32]
Halperin, S. and Heath, O. 2017. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
[33]
Hancke, Bob 2010. Chapter 11: The challenge of research design [IN] Theory and Methods in Political Science. Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave Macmillan.
[34]
Hansen, L. 2000. Gender, Nation, Rape: Bosnia and the Construction of Security. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 3, 1 (Jan. 2000), 55–75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740010019848.
[35]
HANSEN, L. 2015. How images make world politics: International icons and the case of Abu Ghraib. Review of International Studies. 41, 02 (Apr. 2015), 263–288. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210514000199.
[36]
Hansen, L. 2014. Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Taylor & Francis. 14–23.
[37]
Hansen, Lene 2017. Reading Comics for the Field of International Relations: Theory, Method and the Bosnian War. European Journal of International Relations,. (2017), 581–608.
[38]
Haraway, D 2013. The persistence of vision [IN] The Visual Culture Reader. The visual culture reader. Routledge.
[39]
Hart, C. 2018. Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination. SAGE.
[40]
Hobbs, D. and Wright, R. 2006. The SAGE handbook of fieldwork. SAGE.
[41]
Hollis, M. and Smith, S.M. 1990. Explaining and understanding international relations. Clarendon.
[42]
Homan, R. 1992. The Ethics of Open Methods. The British Journal of Sociology. 43, 3 (Sep. 1992). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/591538.
[43]
Howarth, D.R. 2000. Discourse. Open University Press.
[44]
Hutchings, Kimberly 2008. 1988 and 1998: Contrast and continuity in feminist international relations. MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES. (2008). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829808093732.
[45]
Iraq Inquiry - Sir John Chilcot’s public statement, 6 July 2016: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20171123124608/http://www.iraqinquiry.org.uk/the-inquiry/sir-john-chilcots-public-statement/.
[46]
J. Ann Tickner 1997. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 41, 4 (1997).
[47]
Jackson, P.T. 2011. The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Routledge.
[48]
Jan Jindy Pettman 1996. Worlding Women : A Feminist International Politics. Routledge.
[49]
Jean Baudrillard 2000. Photography, Or The Writing Of Light. CTheory. (2000), 4-12/2000.
[50]
Jeremy Walker; Melinda Cooper 2011. Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security. 42, 2 (2011), 143–160.
[51]
Jones, A. and Taylor & Francis 2009. Gender inclusive: essays on violence, men, and feminist international relations. Routledge.
[52]
Kirin Narayan 1993. How Native Is a ‘Native’ Anthropologist? American Anthropologist. 95, 3 (1993).
[53]
Klotz, A. and Prakash, D. 2008. Qualitative methods in international relations: a pluralist guide. Palgrave Macmillan.
[54]
Koo, KL 2002. Confronting a disciplinary blindness: Women, war and rape in the international politics of security. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE;. (2002). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1036114022000032744.
[55]
Kurki, M. 2008. Chapter 1 [IN] Causation in international relations: reclaiming causal analysis. Causation in International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
[56]
Kurki, M and Wright, C 2006. International Relations and Social Science [IN] International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[57]
Lamont, C. 2015. Chapter 1 Research Methods in International relations [IN] Research methods in international relations. Research methods in international relations. SAGE. 13–29.
[58]
Lamont, C. 2015. Chapter 2 Research questions and Research Design [IN] Research methods in international relations. Research methods in international relations. SAGE. 30–48.
[59]
Lamont, C. 2015. Chapter 4 Writing a Literature Review [IN] Research methods in international relations. Research methods in international relations. SAGE. 64–76.
[60]
Latham, Alan 2003. Research, performance, and doing human geography: some reflections on the diary-photograph, diary-interview method. Environment & Planning A. 35, Issue 11 (2003), 1993–2017.
[61]
Lebow, R.N. 2014. Constructing Cause in International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
[62]
Letherby, G. 2003. Feminist research in theory and practice. Open University Press.
[63]
Lisle, D. and Johnson, H.L. 2018. Lost in the aftermath. Security Dialogue. (Apr. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010618762271.
[64]
Little, R. 1991. International Relations and the Methodological Turn. Political Studies. 39, 3 (Sep. 1991), 463–478. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb01623.x.
[65]
Mamdani, M. 2012. Define and Rule: Native as Political Identity. Harvard University Press.
[66]
Marsh, D. and Stoker, G. 2010. Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave Macmillan.
[67]
Metz, C. 1985. Photography and Fetish. October. 34, (Autumn 1985). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/778490.
[68]
Michael J. Shapiro 2008. Cinematic Geopolitics. Taylor & Francis Group.
[69]
Milliken, Jennifer The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations. 5, Issue 2.
[70]
Mirzoeff, N. 2013. Introduction: For Critical Visuality Studies [IN] The Visual Culture Reader. The visual culture reader. Routledge.
[71]
Moon, C. 2006. Narrating Political Reconciliation: Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Social & Legal Studies. (2006).
[72]
Moore, Cerwyn; Shepherd, Laura J. 2010. Aesthetics and International Relations: Towards a Global Politics. Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations. 24, Issue 3 (2010), 299–309. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2010.485564.
[73]
Paul Messaris 1994. Visual ‘literacy’. Westview Press.
[74]
Peterson, V.S. 1992. Gendered states: feminist (re)visions of international relations theory. Lynne Rienner.
[75]
Phythian, Mark 2012. Policing Uncertainty: Intelligence, Security and Risk. Intelligence & National Security. 27, Issue 2 (2012), 187–205. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2012.661642.
[76]
Ralph, Jason 2011. After Chilcot: the ‘doctrine of international community’ and the UK decision to invade Iraq. Journal of Politics & International Relations. 13, 3 (2011).
[77]
Ranciere, J 2013. Notes on the photographic image [IN] The Visual Culture Reader. The visual culture reader. Routledge.
[78]
Review by: R. Charli Carpenter 2002. Review: Gender Theory in World Politics: Contributions of a Nonfeminist Standpoint? International Studies Review. 4, 3 (2002).
[79]
Ribbens McCarthy, J. and Edwards, R. 1998. Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: public knowledge and private lives. SAGE.
[80]
Ridley, D. 2012. The literature review: a step-by-step guide for students. SAGE.
[81]
Riley, R.L. et al. 2008. Feminism and war: confronting US imperialism. Zed.
[82]
Rose, G. 2016. Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. SAGE.
[83]
Rose, G. and Tolia-Kelly, D.P. 2012. Visuality/materiality: images, objects and practices. Ashgate.
[84]
Rowley, C. 2014. Popular culture and the politics of the visual [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Taylor & Francis.
[85]
Said, E.W. 1994. Culture and imperialism. Vintage.
[86]
Said, E.W. 2003. Orientalism. Penguin.
[87]
Sayad, A. et al. 2004. The suffering of the immigrant. Polity.
[88]
Schlag, G. and Geis, A. 2017. Visualizing violence: aesthetics and ethics in international politics. Global Discourse. 7, 2–3 (Jul. 2017), 193–200. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2017.1359995.
[89]
Shepherd, Laura J. 2017. Aesthetics, Ethics, and Visual Research in the Digital Age: "Undone in the Face of the Otter’. MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES;. (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816684255.
[90]
Smith, L.T. 2012. Chapter 12 Getting the Story Right, Telling the Story Well: Indigenous Activism, Indigenous Research [IN] Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books. 343–359.
[91]
Smith, L.T. 2012. Introduction [IN] Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books. 30–56.
[92]
Spivak, G.C. 1988. In other worlds: essays in cultural politics. Routledge.
[93]
Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires 1998. Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review of International Studies. 24, 2 (1998).
[94]
The Power of Images in Global Politics: 2018. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/03/08/the-power-of-images-in-global-politics/.
[95]
Thomas, O.D. 2017. Good faith and (dis)honest mistakes? Learning from Britain’s Iraq War Inquiry. Politics. 37, 4 (Nov. 2017), 371–385. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395716688488.
[96]
Tony Blair statement in response to The Report of the Iraq Inquiry: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chilcot-report-tony-blair-read-response-statement-in-full-iraq-war-inquiry-a7123251.html.
[97]
V. Spike Peterson 1999. Global gender issues. Westview Press.
[98]
Vicki Squire: 12 days in Lampedusa: The potential and perils of a photo essay @FocaalBlog: http://www.focaalblog.com/2016/01/11/vicki-squire-12-days-in-lampedusa-the-potential-and-perils-of-a-photo-essay/.
[99]
VUCETIC, S. 2011. Genealogy as a research tool in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 37, 03 (Jul. 2011), 1295–1312. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000938.
[100]
Weldes, J. and Rowley, C. 2015. So, how does popular culture relate to world politics? [IN] Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies. Popular Culture and World Politics: Theories, Methods, Pedagogies. E-International Relations Publishing. 11–34.
[101]
Young, R. 2001. Postcolonialism: an historical introduction. Blackwell.
[102]
Zalewski, M. 2014. Feminist International Relations: Making sense ... [IN] Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Taylor & Francis. 3–13.
[103]
Zalewski, M. 1995. ‘Well, what is the feminist perspective on Bosnia?’ International Affairs. 71, 2 (Apr. 1995), 339–356. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2623438.
[104]
Zalewski, M. and Parpart, J.L. 1998. ‘Introduction: From the "Woman” Question to the "Man” Question in International Relations’ [IN] The "Man” Question in International Relations. The ‘man’ question in international relations. Westview Press.
[105]
Zalewski, Marysia. Feminism after postmodernism : theorising through practice. London : Routledge, 2000.
[106]
A Passage to Britain - BBC.
[107]
2008. Introduction and Chapter 1 [IN] Research Methods in Politics. Research methods in politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[108]
2009. Review of International Studies. 35, 4 (2009).
