1.
Behn, A., Spencer, J.: ‘The Rover’ and Other Plays. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).
2.
Stephen Greenblatt: The Norton anthology of English literature. W.W. Norton & Co., New York (2012).
3.
Middleton, T., Carroll, W.C.: Four plays. Methuen Drama, London (2012).
4.
Scott-Warren, J.: Early modern English literature. Polity, Cambridge (2005).
5.
Belsey, C.: John Milton. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1988).
6.
Chalmers, H.: Royalist women writers, 1650-1689. Clarendon, Oxford (2004).
7.
Greenblatt, S.J., American Council of Learned Societies: Shakespearean negotiations: the circulation of social energy in Renaissance England. University of California Press, Berkeley (1988).
8.
Guibbory, A.: Ceremony and community from Herbert to Milton: literature, religion, and cultural conflict in seventeenth-century England. Cambridge University Press, New York (1998).
9.
Helgerson, R.: Forms of nationhood: the Elizabethan writing of England. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1992).
10.
Norbrook, D.: Poetry and politics in the English Renaissance. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002).
11.
O’Callaghan, M.: Thomas Middleton: Reanaissance dramatist. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2009).
12.
Smith, B.R.: Homosexual desire in Shakespeare’s England: a cultural poetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994).
13.
Marlowe, Christopher: Hero and Leander. In: The Norton anthology of English literature. the major authors. New York : W.W. Norton & Company, [2013].
14.
Full text of ‘Hero and Leander’, https://archive.org/stream/heroandleander18781gut/18781.txt.
15.
Brown, G.E.: Redefining Elizabethan literature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
16.
Brown, G.E.: Gender and Voice in Hero and Leander. In: Constructing Christopher Marlowe. Cambridge University Press.
17.
Summers, C.J.: Hero and Leander: The Arbitrariness of Desire. In: Constructing Christopher Marlowe. Cambridge University Press.
18.
JUDITH HABER: ‘True-loves blood’: Narrative and Desire in ‘Hero and Leander’. English Literary Renaissance. 28, (1998).
19.
Yearling, R.: Homoerotic Desire and Renaissance Lyric Verse. SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900. 53, 53–71 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1353/sel.2013.0007.
20.
Campbell, M.: ‘Desunt Nonnulla’: The Construction of Marlowe’s Hero and Leander as an Unfinished Poem. ELH. 51, (1984). https://doi.org/10.2307/2872945.
21.
William P. Weaver: Marlowe’s Fable: ‘Hero and Leander’ and the Rudiments of Eloquence. Studies in Philology. 105, (2008).
22.
Braden, Gordon: Hero and Leander in Bed (and the Morning After). English Literary Renaissance. 205–230 (2015).
23.
Cheney, P. ed: The Cambridge Companion to Christopher Marlowe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
24.
Hulse, C.: Metamorphic verse: the Elizabethan minor epic. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1981).
25.
Keach, W.: Elizabethan erotic narratives: irony and pathos in the Ovidian poetry of Shakespeare, Marlowe and their contemporaries. Harvester Press, Hassocks (1977).
26.
JOHN LEONARD: Marlowe’s Doric Music: Lust and Aggression in ‘Hero and Leander’. English Literary Renaissance. 30, (2000).
27.
Orgel, S.: Musaeus in English. George Herbert Journal. 67–75 (2005).
28.
Sinfield, A.: Marlowe’s Erotic Verse. In: Early modern English poetry: a critical companion. pp. 125–135. Oxford University Press, New York (2007).
29.
Hattaway, M.: A companion to English renaissance literature and culture. Blackwell, Oxford (2000).
30.
Guy-Bray, S.: Homoerotic Space: The Poetics of Loss in Renaissance Literature. University of Toronto Press, Toronto (2002). https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442675841.
31.
Katharine Cleland: ‘Wanton loves, and yong desires’: Clandestine Marriage in Marlowe’s ‘Hero and Leander’ and Chapman’s Continuation. Studies in Philology. 108, (2011).
32.
Greenstadt, A., Taylor & Francis: Rape and the rise of the author: gendering intention in early modern England. Ashgate, Farnham, England.
33.
Stephen Greenblatt: The Norton anthology of English literature. W.W. Norton & Co., New York (2012).
34.
Tamsin Badcoe: ‘The compasse of that Islands space’: Insular fictions in the writing of Edmund Spenser. Renaissance Studies. 25, (2011).
35.
Borris, K.: Allegory and epic in English Renaissance literature : heroic form in Sidney, Spenser, and Milton / Kenneth Borris. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).
36.
Gless, D.J.: Interpretation and theology in Spenser. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994).
37.
Burlinson, C.: Allegory, space and the material world in the writings of Edmund Spenser. D.S. Brewer, Woodbridge, Suffolk, UK (2006).
38.
Gregerson, L.: The reformation of the subject: Spenser, Milton, and the English Protestant epic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995).
39.
Hamilton, A.. C..: The Bible and Spenser’s Faerie Queene Sacred and Secular Scripture. Journal of English Language and Literature. 38, 667–682 (1992).
40.
Helgerson, R.: Forms of nationhood: the Elizabethan writing of England. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1992).
41.
Thomas Herron: Spenser’s Irish Work. Ashgate.
42.
Morrison, J.K., Greenfield, M.: Edmund Spenser: essays on culture and allegory. Ashgate, Aldershot (2000).
43.
Robinson, B.S.: Islam and early modern English literature: the politics of romance from Spenser to Milton. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2007).
44.
Burton J. Weber: The Interlocking Triads of the First Book of ‘The Faerie Queene’. Studies in Philology. 90, (1993).
45.
Woodcock, M.: Fairy in The faerie queene: Renaissance elf-fashioning and Elizabethan myth-making. Ashgate, Aldershot (2004).
46.
James W. Broaddus: Spenser’s Redcrosse Knight and the Order of Salvation. Studies in Philology. 108, (2011).
47.
Greenblatt, S.: To Fashion a Gentleman: Spenser and the Bower of Bliss. In: Renaissance poetry. Longman, London (1998).
48.
Andrew Hadfield: Spenser, Drayton, and the Question of Britain. The Review of English Studies. 51, (2000).
49.
Hester Lees-Jeffries: From the Fountain to the Well: Redcrosse Learns to Read. Studies in Philology. 100, (2003).
50.
Vaught, J.C.: Spenser’s Dialogic Voice in Book 1 of ‘The Faerie Queene’. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. 41, (2001). https://doi.org/10.2307/1556229.
51.
Middleton, T., Carroll, W.C.: Four plays. Methuen Drama, London (2012).
52.
Taylor, G.: Middleton, Thomas (bap. 1580, d. 1627). In: Matthew, H.C.G. and Harrison, B. (eds.) The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/18682.
53.
Jowett, J.: Thomas Middleton [IN] A companion to Renaissance drama. In: A companion to Renaissance drama. pp. 507–523. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (2002).
54.
Hopkins, L.: The female hero in English Renaissance tragedy. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2002).
55.
BIGGS, M.: DOES THE DUKE RAPE BIANCA IN MIDDLETON’S WOMEN BEWARE WOMEN ? Notes and Queries. 44, 97–100 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/44-1-97.
56.
Bromham, A.A.: The Tragedy of Peace: Political Meaning in Women Beware Women. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. 26, (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/450510.
57.
Middleton, T.: Women beware women [IN] Four plays. In: Four plays. Methuen Drama, London (2012).
58.
ALISON FINDLAY: PLAYING SPACES IN EARLY WOMEN’S DRAMA. CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS, CAMBRIDGE.
59.
Jennifer L. Heller: Space, Violence, and Bodies in Middleton and Cary. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. 45, (2005).
60.
Hiscock, A.: Women beware women: a critical guide. Continuum, London (2011).
61.
HUTCHINGS, M.: MIDDLETON’S WOMEN BEWARE WOMEN: RAPE, SEDUCTION - OR POWER, SIMPLY? Notes and Queries. 45, 366–367 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/45-3-366.
62.
Levin, R.A.: If Women Should Beware Women, Bianca Should Beware Mother. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. 37, (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/450839.
63.
Christopher Ricks: Word-Play in Women Beware Women. The Review of English Studies. 12, (1961).
64.
Taylor, N., Loughrey, B.: Middleton’s Chess Strategies in Women Beware Women. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. 24, (1984). https://doi.org/10.2307/450532.
65.
Thomson, L.: ‘Enter Above’: The Staging of Women Beware Women. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. 26, (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/450511.
66.
Tricomi, A.H.: Middleton’s ‘Women Beware Women’ as Anticourt Drama. Modern Language Studies. 19, (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/3195193.
67.
Ann C. Christensen: Settling House in Middleton’s ‘Women Beware Women’. Comparative Drama. 29, (1995).
68.
Ellerbeck, E.: Adoptive Names in Thomas Middleton’s Women Beware Women. SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900. 57, 407–426 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1353/sel.2017.0018.
69.
Jowett, J.: Introduction: Women Beware Women: A Tragedy [IN] Thomas Middleton: the collected works, Vol. 1. In: Thomas Middleton: the collected works, Vol. 1. pp. 1488–1492. Oxford University Press, [Oxford?] (2012).
70.
Holdsworth, Roger.V.: Women Beware Women and The Changeling on the Stage [IN] Three Jacobean revenge tragedies: a casebook. In: Three Jacobean revenge tragedies: a casebook. pp. 247–274. Macmillan Education, Basingstoke (1990).
71.
Goldberg, J.: Fatherly Authority: The Politics of Stuart Family Images [IN] Rewriting the Renaissance: the discourses of sexual difference in early modern Europe. In: Rewriting the Renaissance: the discourses of sexual difference in early modern Europe. pp. 3–32. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1986).
72.
Keeble, N.H.: The cultural identity of seventeenth century woman: a reader. Routledge, London (1994).
73.
Middleton, T., Frost, D.L.: The selected plays of Thomas Middleton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1978).
74.
Stephen Greenblatt: The Norton anthology of English literature. W.W. Norton & Co., New York (2012).
75.
Hoxby, B.: Areopagitica and Liberty. In: The Oxford handbook of Milton. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
76.
Blum, A.: The Author’s Authority: Areopagitica and the Labour of Licensing. In: Re-membering Milton: essays on the texts and traditions. pp. 74–96. Methuen, New York (1988).
77.
WILLIAM M. RUSSELL: Love, Chaos, and Marvell’s Elegy for Cromwell. English Literary Renaissance. 40, (2010).
78.
Achinstein, S.: Milton and the Revolutionary Reader. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2014).
79.
Sharon Achinstein: Literature and Dissent in Milton’s England. Cambridge University Press.
80.
Early Modern Nationalism and Milton’s. University of Toronto Press.
81.
McDowell, N.: Poetry and allegiance in the English civil wars: Marvell and the cause of wit. (2008).
82.
David Norbrook: Writing the English Republic. Cambridge University Press.
83.
Worden, B.: Literature and politics in Cromwellian England: John Milton, Andrew Marvell, Marchamont Nedham. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
84.
Thomas M. Greene: The Balance of Power in Marvell’s ‘Horatian Ode’. ELH. 60, (1993).
85.
J. Power, A.: Heaven and Hell in Robert Herrick’s Body of Work. The Yearbook of English Studies. 44, (2014). https://doi.org/10.5699/yearenglstud.44.2014.0156.
86.
Belsey, C.: John Milton: Language, Gender, Power. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1988).
87.
Connolly, R., Cain, T.: Lords of wine and oile: community and conviviality in the poetry of Robert Herrick. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
88.
Marcus, L.S.: The politics of mirth: Jonson, Herrick, Milton, Marvell, and the defense of old holiday pastimes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, [Ill.] (1986).
89.
Ingram, R.: Robert Herrick and the Makings of Hesperides. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. 38, (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/451084.
90.
Marus, L.: Robert Herrick [IN] The Cambridge Companion to English Poetry. In: The Cambridge Companion to English Poetry, Donne to Marvell. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993).
91.
Armitage, D., Himy, A., Skinner, Q. eds: Milton and republicanism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995).
92.
Lieb, M., Lieb, M., Shawcross, J.T.: Achievements of the left hand: essays on the prose of John Milton. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst (1974).
93.
Parry, G., Raymond, J.: Milton and the terms of liberty. D.S. Brewer, Cambridge (2002).
94.
Nigel Smith: Literature and Revolution in England, 1640-1660. Yale University Press.
95.
LaBreche, B.: Areopagitica and the Limits of Pluralism. Milton Studies. 54, 139–160 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1353/mlt.2013.0006.
96.
Loewenstein, D.A.: Areopagitica and the Dynamics of History. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. 28, (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/450716.
97.
Clay Daniel: Why ‘Areopagitica?’ South Atlantic Review. 75, (2010).
98.
John McWilliams: Marvell and Milton’s Literary Friendship Reconsidered. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. 46, (2006).
99.
Behn, A., Spencer, J.: ‘The Rover’ and Other Plays. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).
100.
Spencer, J.: Aphra Behn’s afterlife. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000).
101.
Stephen Szilagyi: The Sexual Politics of Behn’s ‘Rover’: After Patriarchy. Studies in Philology. 95, (1998).
102.
Chernaik, W.L.: Sexual freedom in restoration literature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995).
103.
Hughes, D., Todd, J. eds: The Cambridge Companion to Aphra Behn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
104.
Hughes, D.: The theatre of Aphra Behn. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2001).
105.
Owen, S.J.: Restoration theatre and crisis. Clarendon, Oxford (1996).
106.
Spencer, J.: Aphra Behn’s afterlife. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000).
107.
Janet M. Todd: The secret life of Aphra Behn. Andre Deutsch, London (1996).
108.
Todd, Janet M: Aphra Behn. Basingstoke : Macmillan, 1999.
109.
James Grantham Turner: Libertines and Radicals in Early Modern London. Cambridge University Press.
110.
Anita Pacheco: Rape and the Female Subject in Aphra Behn’s ‘The Rover’. ELH. 65, (1998).
111.
Young, E.V.: Aphra Behn, Gender, and Pastoral. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900. 33, (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/451012.
112.
Hutner, H.: Rereading Aphra Behn: history, theory, and criticism. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville (1993).
113.
O’Donnell, M.A., Dhuicq, B., Leduc, G.: Aphra Behn (1640-1689): identity, alterity, ambiguity. L’Harmattan, Paris (2000).
114.
Chalmers, H.: Royalist women writers, 1650-1689. (2004).
115.
Todd, J.M.: Aphra Behn studies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996).
116.
Sanders, J.: Adaptation and appropriation. Routledge (2006).
117.
De Groot, J., Taylor & Francis: Remaking history: the past in contemporary historical fictions. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, Abingdon, Oxon (2016).
118.
Brown, S., Lublin, R.I., McCulloch, L.: Reinventing the Renaissance: Shakespeare and his contemporaries in adaptation and performance. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).
119.
Fortier, M., Fischlin, D.: Adaptations of Shakespeare: a critical anthology of plays from the 17th century to the present. Routledge, London (2000).
120.
Cartmell, D., Whelehan, I.: Adaptations: From Text to Screen, Screen to Text. Routledge, London (1999).
121.
Corrigan, T.: The Oxford handbook of adaptation studies. In: Leitch, T.M. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of adaptation studies. Oxford University Press, New York (2017).
122.
Cartmell, D.: 100+ Years of Adaptations. In: A companion to literature, film, and adaptation. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex (2012).
123.
Pilhuj, K.: Anne of the Thousand Adaptations. Early Modern Women. 10, 115–118 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1353/emw.2016.0007.
124.
Hutcheon, L., O’Flynn, S.: A theory of adaptation. Routledge, London (2012).
125.
Burnett, M.T., Wray, R.: Screening Shakespeare in the twenty-first century. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
126.
Buhler, S.M., ProQuest (Firm): Shakespeare in the cinema: ocular proof. State University of New York Press, Albany (2002).
127.
Burnett, M.T.: Shakespeare and world cinema. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013).
128.
Trivedi, P., Chakravarti, P.: Shakespeare and Indian cinemas : ‘local habitations’. Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, NY (2019).
129.
Dionne, C., Kapadia, P.: Bollywood Shakespeares. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014).
130.
Sharda, S.: Black Skin, Black Castes: Overcoming a Fidelity Discourse in Bhardwaj’s Omkara. Shakespeare Bulletin. 35, 599–626 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1353/shb.2017.0046.
131.
Lalita Pandit Hogan: The Sacred and the Profane in Omkara: Vishal Bhardwaj’s Hindi Adaptation of Othello. Image and Narrative : Online Magazine of the Visual Narrative. 11, 49–62 (2010).
132.
Cabaret, F.: Indianizing Othello: Vishal Bhardwaj’s Omkara. In: Hatchuel, S. and Vienne-Guerrin, N. (eds.) Shakespeare on Screen: Othello. pp. 107–121. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316272060.008.
