[1]
Adler, E. and Haas, P.M. 1992. Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program. International Organization. 46, 1 (1992).
[2]
Allen, C. 2001. ‘They just don’t live and breathe the policy like we do…’: Policy intentions and practice dilemmas in modern social policy and implementation networks. Policy Studies. 22, 3–4 (2001), 149–166.
[3]
Anderson, J.E. 1975. Public Policy-Making. Nelson.
[4]
Anderson, J.E. 1975. Public Policy-Making. Nelson.
[5]
Araral, E. et al. 2012. Routledge Handbook of Public Policy.
[6]
Araral, E. et al. Routledge Handbook of Public Policy.
[7]
Arentsen, M.J. et al. 2000. Institutional and Policy Responses to Uncertainty in Environmental Policy: A Comparison of Dutch and U.S. Styles. Policy Studies Journal. 28, 3 (2000), 597–611.
[8]
Asare, B.E. and Studlar, D.T. 2009. Lesson-drawing and public policy: secondhand smoking restrictions in Scotland and England. Policy Studies. 30, 3 (2009), 365–382.
[9]
Atikcan, E.Ö. 2015. Diffusion in Referendum Campaigns: The Case of EU Constitutional Referendums. Journal of European Integration. 37, 4 (2015), 451–470.
[10]
Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M.S. 1962. Two Faces of Power. The American Political Science Review. 56, 4 (1962), 947–952.
[11]
Baggot, R. 1995. From Confrontation to Consultation? Pressure Group Relations From Thatcher to Major. Parliamentary Affairs. 48, (1995), 484–502.
[12]
Bardach, E. 1976. Policy Termination as a Political Process. Policy Sciences. 7, 2 (1976), 123–131.
[13]
Baumgartner, F.R. et al. 2006. ‘Comparative studies of policy agendas’ [in] Journal of European Public Policy. Journal of European Public Policy. 13, 7 (2006), 959–974.
[14]
Baumgartner, F.R. et al. 2009. ‘Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective’ [in] American Journal of Political Science. American Journal of Political Science. 53, 3 (2009), 603–620.
[15]
Baumgartner, F.R. et al. 2018. ‘Punctuated equilibrium theory: explaining stability and change in public policymaking’ [in] Theories of the Policy Process. Theories of the Policy Process. C.M. Weible and P.A. Sabatier, eds. Routledge.
[16]
Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. The University of Chicago Press.
[17]
Baumgartner, F.R. and Mahoney, C. 2008. ‘The Two Faces of Framing: Individual-Level Framing and Collective Issue Definition in the European Union’ [in] European Union Politics. European Union Politics. 9, 3 (2008), 435–449.
[18]
Beletsky, L. et al. 2005. Attitudes of police officers towards syringe access, occupational needle-sticks, and drug use: A qualitative study of one city police department in the United States. International Journal of Drug Policy. 16, 4 (2005), 267–274.
[19]
Bell, R. et al. 1969. Political Power: A Reader in Theory and Research. Free Press.
[20]
Bennett, C.J. 1997. Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross-National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability. Governance. 10, 3 (1997), 213–233.
[21]
Benson, D. and Jordan, A. 2012. Policy Transfer Research: Still Evolving, Not Yet Through? Political Studies Review. 10, 3 (2012), 333–338.
[22]
Bessant, J. 2008. From ‘harm minimization’ to ‘zero tolerance’ drugs policy in Australia: how the Howard government changed its mind. Policy Studies. 29, 2 (2008), 197–214.
[23]
Birrell, D. 2008. Devolution and quangos in the United Kingdom: the implementation of principles and policies for rationalisation and democratisation. Policy Studies. 29, 1 (2008), 35–49.
[24]
Boin, A. et al. 2009. Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public Policy. 16, 1 (2009), 81–106.
[25]
Boin, A. et al. 2008. Governing After Crisis: The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning. Cambridge University Press.
[26]
Bothun, D. and Comer, J.C. 1979. The Politics of Termination: Concepts and Process. Policy Studies Journal. 7, 3 (1979), 540–553.
[27]
Bovens, M. et al. 2010. The politics of policy evaluation. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford University Press.
[28]
Breunig, C. and Koski, C. 2012. The Tortoise or the Hare? Incrementalism, Punctuations, and Their Consequences. Policy Studies Journal. 40, 1 (2012), 45–68.
[29]
Brewer, G.D. 1978. Termination: Hard Choices, Harder Questions. Public Administration Review. 38, 4 (1978), 338–344.
[30]
Browne, A. and Wildavsky, A. 1984. Chapter 10: Implementation as Mutual Adjustment. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland. University of California Press. 206–231.
[31]
Burch, M. and Wood, B. 1983. Chapter 7: The Products of Government: Carrying out Intentions. Public Policy in Britain. Robertson. 167–192.
[32]
Burch, M. and Wood, B. 1983. Public Policy in Britain. Robertson.
[33]
Cairney, P. 2011. The New British Policy Style: From a British to a Scottish Political Tradition? Political Studies Review. 9, 2 (2011), 208–220.
[34]
Cairney, P. 2012. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan.
[35]
Cairney, P. 2012. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan.
[36]
Cairney, P. 2012. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan.
[37]
Cairney, P. 2012. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan.
[38]
Cairney, P. 2012. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan.
[39]
Cairney, P. 2012. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan.
[40]
Cairney, P. 2012. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan.
[41]
Carroll, P. and Common, R. 2013. Policy Transfer and Learning in Public Policy and Management: International Contexts, Content and Development. Routledge.
[42]
Carroll, P. and Common, R. 2013. Policy Transfer and Learning in Public Policy and Management: International Contexts, Content and Development. Routledge.
[43]
Clarke, J. et al. 2015. Making Policy Move: Towards a Politics of Translation and Assemblage. Policy Press.
[44]
Cobb, M.D. and Kuklinski, J.H. 1997. Changing Minds: Political Arguments and Political Persuasion. American Journal of Political Science. 41, 1 (1997), 88–121.
[45]
Cohen, M.D. et al. 1972. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly. 17, 1 (1972), 1–25.
[46]
Collins, M. 2014. The Beatles’ Politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 16, 2 (2014), 291–309.
[47]
Couldry, N. and Markham, T. 2007. Celebrity culture and public connection: Bridge or chasm? International Journal of Cultural Studies. 10, 4 (2007), 403–421.
[48]
Cram, L. 2001. Whither the Commission? Reform, renewal and the issue-attention cycle. Journal of European Public Policy. 8, 5 (2001), 770–786.
[49]
Crenson, M.A. 1971. The Un-Politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non-Decisionmaking in the Cities. Johns Hopkins Press.
[50]
Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. 1992. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Blackwell Business.
[51]
Daniels, M.R. 1995. Organizational Termination and Policy Continuation: Closing the Oklahoma Public Training Schools. Policy Sciences. 28, 3 (1995), 301–316.
[52]
Davies, H. et al. 2007. Academic Advice to Practitioners? The Role and Use of Research-Based Evidence. Public Money and Management. 27, 4 (2007), 232–235.
[53]
Davis, O.A. et al. 1966. A Theory of the Budgetary Process. The American Political Science Review. 60, 3 (1966), 529–547.
[54]
Daviter, F. 2007. Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy. 14, 4 (2007), 654–666.
[55]
Dempster, M.A.H. and Wildavsky, A. 1979. On Change: Or There is No Magic Size for an Increment. Political Studies. 27, 3 (1979), 371–389.
[56]
Dery, D. 2000. Agenda Setting and Problem Definition. Policy Studies. 21, 1 (2000), 37–47.
[57]
Dery, D. 2000. ‘Agenda Setting and Problem Definition’ [in] Policy Studies. Policy Studies. 21, 1 (2000), 37–47.
[58]
Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. 1996. Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature. Political Studies. 44, 2 (1996), 343–357.
[59]
Dolowitz, D.P. and Marsh, D. 2000. Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance. 13, 1 (2000), 5–23.
[60]
Dommett, K. and Skelcher, C. 2014. Opening the Black Box of Administrative Reform: A Strategic-Relational Analysis. International Public Management Journal. 17, 4 (2014), 540–563.
[61]
Dorey, P. 2005. Organized interests and policy networks. Policy Making in Britain: An Introduction. SAGE.
[62]
Dorey, P. 2005. Policy Making in Britain: An Introduction. SAGE.
[63]
Dowding, K. 1995. Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach. Political Studies. 43, 1 (1995), 136–158.
[64]
Downs, A. 1972. Up and Down with Ecology-the Issue-Attention Cycle. The Public Interest. 28, 1 (1972), 65–80.
[65]
Druckman, J.N. 2001. On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? The Journal of Politics. 63, 4 (2001), 1041–1066.
[66]
Druckman, J.N. and Nelson, K.R. 2003. Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence. American Journal of Political Science. 47, 4 (2003), 729–745.
[67]
Dunér, A. and Nordström, M. 2006. The discretion and power of street-level bureaucrats: an example from Swedish municipal eldercare. European Journal of Social Work. 9, 4 (2006), 425–444.
[68]
Dunlop, C. 2000. Epistemic Communities: A Reply to Toke. Politics. 20, 3 (2000), 137–144.
[69]
Dunlop, C. 2014. How Policy Elites Learn and Why Policy Legacies Matter: A Process Analysis of Gay Marriage Legalization in England and Wales. Council For European Studies.
[70]
Dunlop, C. et al. 2014. The appraisal of policy appraisal – learning about impact assessment. (2014).
[71]
Dunlop, C.A. 2009. Policy transfer as learning: capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies. 30, 3 (2009), 289–311.
[72]
Dunlop, C.A. 2009. Policy transfer as learning: capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies. 30, 3 (2009), 289–311.
[73]
Dunlop, C.A. 2009. Principal-Agent Modelling and Learning: The European Commission, Experts and Agricultural Hormone Growth Promoters. Public Policy and Administration. 30, 3 (2009), 291–313.
[74]
Dunlop, C.A. 2009. The temporal dimension of knowledge and the limits of policy appraisal: biofuels policy in the UK. Policy Sciences. 43, 4 (2009), 343–363.
[75]
Dunlop, C.A. 2007. Up and down the pecking order, what matters and when in issue definition: the case of rbST in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy. 14, 1 (2007), 39–58.
[76]
Dunlop, C.A. and Radaelli, C.M. 2013. Systematising Policy Learning: From Monolith to Dimensions. Political Studies. 61, 3 (2013), 599–619.
[77]
Dunn, W.N. 2012. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Pearson.
[78]
Evans, M. 2009. Policy Transfer in Critical Perspective. Policy Studies. 30, 3 (2009), 243–268.
[79]
Farrell, N. 2012. Celebrity Politics: Bono, Product (RED) and the Legitimising of Philanthrocapitalism. British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 14, (2012), 392–406.
[80]
Ferris, J.M. and Tang, S.-Y. 1993. The New Institutionalism and Public Administration: An Overview. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART. 3, 1 (1993), 4–10.
[81]
Forbes, T. et al. 2010. Implementing health and social care policy – England and Scotland compared. Policy Studies. 31, 6 (2010), 591–611.
[82]
Frantz, J.E. 2002. Political Resources for Policy Terminators. Policy Studies Journal. 30, 1 (2002), 11–28.
[83]
Frantz, J.E. 1992. Reviving and Revising a Termination Model. Policy Sciences. 25, 2 (1992), 175–189.
[84]
Frederking, L.C. 2012. A comparative study of framing immigration policy after 11 September 2001. Policy Studies. 33, 4 (2012), 283–296.
[85]
Freeman, G.P. 1985. National Styles and Policy Sectors: Explaining Structured Variation. Journal of Public Policy. 5, 4 (1985), 467–496.
[86]
Freeman, R. 2010. Learning in public policy. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford University Press.
[87]
Fyfe, G. et al. 2009. 'Muddling through’ in a devolved polity: implementation of equal opportunities policy in Scotland. Policy Studies. 30, 2 (2009), 203–219.
[88]
Geva-May, I. 2004. Riding the Wave of Opportunity: Termination in Public Policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 14, 3 (2004), 309–333.
[89]
Graddy, E.A. and Ye, K. 2008. When Do We ‘Just Say No’? Policy Termination Decisions in Local Hospital Services. Policy Studies Journal. 36, 2 (2008), 219–242.
[90]
Greener, I. 2004. The three moments of New Labour’s health policy discourse. Policy and Politics. 32, 3 (2004), 303–316.
[91]
Gregory, R. 2016. Political rationality or incrementalism. The Public Policy Process. Routledge.
[92]
Gunn, L.A. 1978. Why is implementation so difficult? Management Services in Government. 33, (1978), 169–176.
[93]
Haas, P.M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization. 46, 1 (1992), 1–35.
[94]
Hall, C.M. 2002. Travel Safety, Terrorism and the Media: The Significance of the Issue-Attention Cycle. Current Issues in Tourism. 5, 5 (2002), 458–466.
[95]
Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R. 1996. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies. 44, 5 (1996), 936–957.
[96]
Ham, C. and Hill, M. 1993. Chapter 1: Policy and Policy Analysis. The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State. Harvester Wheatsheaf. 1–21.
[97]
Ham, C. and Hill, M. 1993. The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
[98]
Hann, A. 1995. Sharpening up Sabatier: Belief Systems and Public Policy. Politics. 15, 1 (1995), 19–26.
[99]
Hay, C. 2010. Globalization and public policy. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford University Press.
[100]
Hay, C. and Richards, D. 2000. The Tangled Webs of Westminster and Whitehall: The Discourse, Strategy and Practice of Networking Within the British Core Executive. Public Administration. 78, 1 (2000), 1–28.
[101]
Hayward, J. 1974. National Aptitudes for Planning in Britain, France, and Italy. Government and Opposition. 9, 4 (1974), 397–410.
[102]
Heclo, H. 1978. Chapter 3: Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment. The New American Political System. American Institute. 87–124.
[103]
Heidenheimer, A.J. et al. 1983. Comparative Public Policy: The Politics of Social Choice in Europe and America. Macmillan.
[104]
Hennessy, P. 2002. The Blair Government in Historical Perspective: An Analysis of the Power Relationships within New Labour. History Today. 52, 1 (2002), 21–25.
[105]
Hennessy, P. 1998. The Blair Style of Government: An Historical Perspective and an Interim Audit. Government and Opposition. 33, 1 (1998), 3–20.
[106]
Henry, G.T. and Gordon, C.S. ‘Tracking Issue Attention: Specifying the Dynamics of the Public Agenda’ [in] The Public Opinion Quarterly. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 65, 2, 157–177.
[107]
Hill, M. 1997. Chapter 7: The Policy Process as an Organisational Process. The Policy Process in the Modern State. Prentice Hall. 153–176.
[108]
Hill, M. 1997. Implementation Theory: Yesterday’s Issue? Policy and Politics. 25, 4 (1997), 375–385.
[109]
Hill, M. 1997. The Policy Process: A Reader. Prentice Hall.
[110]
Hill, M. 1997. The Policy Process: A Reader. Prentice Hall.
[111]
Hill, M. 1997. The Policy Process in the Modern State. Prentice Hall.
[112]
Hill, M.J. 2013. The Public Policy Process. Pearson.
[113]
Hill, M.J. 2013. The Public Policy Process. Pearson.
[114]
Hill, M.J. 2009. The Public Policy Process. Pearson Longman.
[115]
Hill, M.J. 2016. The Public Policy Process. Routledge.
[116]
Hill, M.J. 2013. The Public Policy Process. Pearson.
[117]
Hill, M.J. 2013. The Public Policy Process. Pearson.
[118]
Hill, M.J. and Hupe, P.L. 2002. Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and Practice. Sage.
[119]
Hindmoor, A. 2009. Explaining Networks through Mechanisms: Vaccination, Priming and the 2001 Foot and Mouth Disease Crisis. Political Studies. 57, 1 (2009), 75–94.
[120]
Hogwood, B.W. 1984. Chapter 1: A Framework for Analysis. Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford University Press. 3–11.
[121]
Hogwood, B.W. 1987. Chapter 1: Making Sense of Policy Activity. From Crisis to Complacency?: Shaping Public Policy in Britain. Oxford University Press. 1–24.
[122]
Hogwood, B.W. 1987. Chapter 1: Making sense of policy activity. From Crisis to Complacency?. Oxford University Press. 1–24.
[123]
Hogwood, B.W. 1987. From Crisis to Complacency?: Shaping Public Policy in Britain. Oxford University Press.
[124]
Hogwood, B.W. 1987. From Crisis to Complacency?: Shaping Public Policy in Britain. Oxford University Press.
[125]
Hogwood, B.W. 1992. Ups and Downs: Is There an Issue-Attention Cycle in Britain?. Dept. of Government, University of Strathclyde.
[126]
Hogwood, B.W. and Gunn, L.A. 1984. Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford University Press.
[127]
Hogwood, B.W. and Peters, B.G. 1983. Policy Dynamics. Wheatsheaf Books.
[128]
Howlett, M. 2003. Administrative styles and the Iimits of administrative reform: A neo-institutional analysis of administrative cuIture. Canadian Public Administration/Administration Publique du Canada. 46, 4 (2003), 471–494.
[129]
Howlett, M. 2009. Chapter 7: Policy Implementation. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press. 160–177.
[130]
Howlett, M. 2009. Pages 191-192: The Outcomes of Policy Evaluation: Policy Feedback and Policy Termination. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press. 191–192.
[131]
Howlett, M. et al. 2009. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.
[132]
Howlett, M. et al. 2009. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.
[133]
Howlett, M. et al. 2009. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.
[134]
Howlett, M. et al. 2009. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.
[135]
Howlett, M. et al. 2009. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.
[136]
Howlett, M. et al. 2009. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.
[137]
Howlett, M. et al. 2009. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.
[138]
Howlett, M. et al. 2009. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.
[139]
Howlett, M. et al. 2009. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.
[140]
Hupe, P. et al. 2014. Studying implementation beyond deficit analysis: The top-down view reconsidered. Public Policy and Administration. 29, 2 (2014), 145–163.
[141]
Hupe, P. 2014. What happens on the ground: Persistent issues in implementation research. Public Policy and Administration. 29, 2 (2014), 164–182.
[142]
Hupe, P.L. 2011. The Thesis of Incongruent Implementation: Revisiting Pressman and Wildavsky. Public Policy and Administration. 26, 1 (2011), 63–80.
[143]
Ingold, K. 2011. Network Structures within Policy Processes: Coalitions, Power, and Brokerage in Swiss Climate Policy. Policy Studies Journal. 39, 3 (2011), 435–459.
[144]
Jackson, P.M. 1992. Chapter 2: Economic policy. Implementing Thatcherite Policies: Audit of an Era. Open University Press. 11–31.
[145]
James, O. and Lodge, M. 2003. The Limitations of ‘Policy Transfer’ and ‘Lesson Drawing’ for Public Policy Research. Political Studies Review. 1, 2 (2003), 179–193.
[146]
James, S. 1997. Chapter 5: Implementation and policy review. British Government: A Reader in Policy Making. Routledge. 152–170.
[147]
James, S. 1997. Chapter 5: Implementation and policy review. British Government: A Reader in Policy Making. Routledge. 152–169.
[148]
Janis, I.L. 1982. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin.
[149]
Janis, I.L. and Mann, L. 1977. Decision-Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. The Free Press.
[150]
Jenkins, B. 2016. ‘Policy analysis: models and approaches’ [in] The Public Policy Process. The Public Policy Process. Routledge.
[151]
Jensen, C. 2011. ‘Focusing events, policy dictators and the dynamics of reform’ [in] Policy Studies. Policy Studies. 32, 2 (2011), 143–158.
[152]
John, P. 2012. Analysing Public Policy. Routledge.
[153]
Jones, B.D. and Baumgartner, F.R. 2005. Chapter 1: ‘How government processes information and prioritizes problems’ [in] The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. University of Chicago Press. 1–27.
[154]
Jordan, A. et al. 2013. Policy dismantling. Journal of European Public Policy. 20, 5 (2013), 795–805.
[155]
Jordan, A. and Turnpenny, J. 2015. The Tools of Policy Formulation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
[156]
Jordan, A.G. and Richardson, J.J. 1982. Chapter 4: The British Policy Style or the Logic of Negotiation. Policy Styles in Western Europe. Allen & Unwin. 80–110.
[157]
Jordana, J. 2014. Multiple Crises and Policy Dismantling in Spain: Political Strategies and Distributive Implications. Political Studies Review. 12, 2 (2014), 224–238.
[158]
Kingdon, J.W. 2014. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Pearson.
[159]
Knill, C. 1998. European Policies: The Impact of National Administrative Traditions. Journal of Public Policy. 18, 1 (1998), 1–28.
[160]
Knill, C. and Tosun, J. 2012. Public Policy: A New Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
[161]
Leach, S. 1982. Chapter 1: In Defence of the Rational Model. Approaches in Public Policy. Allen & Unwin for the Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham. 6–23.
[162]
Leifeld, P. and Schneider, V. 2012. Information Exchange in Policy Networks. American Journal of Political Science. 56, 3 (2012), 731–744.
[163]
de Leon, P. 1978. Public Policy Termination: An End and a Beginning. Policy Analysis. 4, 3 (1978), 369–392.
[164]
Lindblom, C.E. 1979. Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. Public Administration Review. 39, 6 (1979), 517–526.
[165]
Lindblom, C.E. 1959. The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review. 19, 2 (1959), 79–88.
[166]
Lindblom, C.E. 1959. The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review. 19, 2 (1959), 79–88.
[167]
Litfin, K.T. 2000. Advocacy Coalitions Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Globalization and Canadian Climate Change Policy. Policy Studies Journal. 28, 1 (2000), 236–252.
[168]
Lowndes, V. 2002. Chapter 4: Institutionalism. Theory and Methods in Political Science. Palgrave Macmillan. 90–108.
[169]
Maassen, P. et al. 2011. Reforming higher education in the Netherlands and Norway: the role of the state and national modes of governance. Policy Studies. 32, 5 (2011), 479–495.
[170]
Maioni, A. 1997. Parting at the Crossroads: The Development of Health Insurance in Canada and the United States, 1940-1965. Comparative Politics. 29, 4 (1997), 411–431.
[171]
Majone, G. 2008. Agenda Setting. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford University Press.
[172]
Mamudu, H. et al. 2015. 'Global Public Policy’: Does the New Venue for Transnational Tobacco Control Challenge the Old Way of Doing Things? Public Administration. (2015).
[173]
Manwaring, R. 2016. The Big Society in Australia: A Case of ‘Non’-Policy Transfer? Australian Journal of Public Administration. 75, 2 (2016), 191–201.
[174]
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. 1976. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Universitetsforlaget.
[175]
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. 2006. Chapter 1: Elaborating the ‘New Institutionalism’. The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford University Press.
[176]
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. 1984. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. The American Political Science Review. 78, 3 (1984), 734–749.
[177]
Mark V. Nadel 1975. The Hidden Dimension of Public Policy: Private Governments and the Policy- Making Process. The Journal of Politics. 37, 1 (1975), 2–34.
[178]
Marsh, D. et al. 2009. Policy networks and the distinction between insider and outsider groups: the case of the Countryside Alliance. Public Administration. 87, 3 (2009), 621–638.
[179]
Marsh, D. and McConnell, A. 2010. Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public Administration. 88, 2 (2010), 564–583.
[180]
Marsh, D. and Smith, M. 2000. Understanding Policy Networks: Towards a Dialectical Approach. Political Studies. 48, 1 (2000), 4–21.
[181]
May, P.J. 2015. Implementation failures revisited: Policy regime perspectives. Public Policy and Administration. 30, 3–4 (2015), 277–299.
[182]
Measuring Performance in Government Departments HC 301 Parliamentary Session 2000-01: .
[183]
Mintz, A. 2005. Applied Decision Analysis: Utilizing Poliheuristic Theory to Explain and Predict Foreign Policy and National Security Decisions. International Studies Perspectives. 6, 1 (2005), 94–98.
[184]
Moran, M. 2001. Not steering but drowning: policy catastrophes and the regulatory state. The Political Quarterly. 72, 4 (2001), 414–427.
[185]
Moran, M. et al. 2010. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford University Press.
[186]
Moss, P. 2004. Sure start. Journal of Education Policy. 19, 5 (2004), 631–634.
[187]
Mucciaroni, G. 1992. The Garbage Can Model & the Study of Policy Making: A Critique. Polity. 24, 3 (1992), 459–482.
[188]
Nadel, M.V. 1976. Rejoinder to Martin Sorin’s Critique. The Journal of Politics. 38, 1 (1976), 164–165.
[189]
Nelson, T.E. et al. 1997. ‘Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance’ [in] The American Political Science Review. The American Political Science Review. 91, 3 (1997), 567–583.
[190]
North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
[191]
Nutley, S.M. and Homel, P. 2008. Delivering evidence-based practice: lessons from the implementation of the UK Crime Reduction Programme. Evidence and Policy. 2, 1 (2008), 5–26.
[192]
O’Leary, C. 2015. Agency Termination in the UK: What Explains the ‘Bonfire of the Quangos’? West European Politics. 38, 6 (2015), 1327–1344.
[193]
O’Riordan, T. 1991. ‘Stability and transformation in environmental government’ [in] Political Quarterly. The Political Quarterly. 62, 2 (1991), 167–185.
[194]
Owens, S. et al. 2004. New agendas for appraisal: reflections on theory, practice, and research. Environment and Planning A. 36, 11 (2004), 1943–1959.
[195]
Page, E.C. 1999. The Insider/Outsider Distinction: An Empirical Investigation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 1, 2 (1999), 205–214.
[196]
Palumbo, D.J. and Nachmias, D. 1983. The preconditions for successful evaluation: is there an ideal paradigm? Policy Sciences. 16, 1 (1983), 67–79.
[197]
Parsons, D.W. 1996. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar.
[198]
Parsons, D.W. 1996. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar.
[199]
Parsons, D.W. 1996. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar.
[200]
Parsons, D.W. 1996. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar.
[201]
Parsons, D.W. 1996. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar.
[202]
Parsons, D.W. 1996. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar.
[203]
Parsons, D.W. 1996. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar.
[204]
Parsons, W.D. 1996. Pages 570-579. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar. 570–579.
[205]
Patashnik, E.M. 1999. Ideas, Inheritances, and the Dynamics of Budgetary Change. Governance. 12, 2 (1999), 147–174.
[206]
Paton, C. 2014. Garbage-can policy-making meets neo-liberal ideology: twenty five years of redundant reform of the English National Health Service. Social Policy & Administration. 48, 3 (2014), 319–342.
[207]
Peck, J. 2011. Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography. 35, 6 (2011), 773–797.
[208]
Peck, J. and Theodore, N. 2015. Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism. University of Minnesota Press.
[209]
Peters, B.G. 1996. Political institutions: old and new. A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford University Press.
[210]
Peters, B.G. and Hogwood, B.W. 1985. ‘In Search of the Issue-Attention Cycle’ [in] The Journal of Politics. The Journal of Politics. 47, 1 (1985), 238–253.
[211]
Pierson, P. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. The American Political Science Review. 94, 2 (2000), 251–267.
[212]
Politics and International Relations - LibGuides at University of Exeter: http://libguides.exeter.ac.uk/PoliticsHomePage.
[213]
Pollitt, C. 1993. Occasional excursions: a brief history of policy evaluation in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs: A Journal of Comparative Politics. 46, (1993), 353–362.
[214]
Radaelli, C.M. 1995. The role of knowledge in the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy. 2, 2 (1995), 159–183.
[215]
Radin, B. 2000. Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Georgetown University Press.
[216]
Rein, M. 2010. Reframing problematic policies. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford University Press.
[217]
Reinicke, W.H. 1997. Global Public Policy. Foreign Affairs. 76, 6 (1997), 127–138.
[218]
Rhodes, R.A.W. 1997. Chapter 4: The institutional approach. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Open University Press. 63–84.
[219]
Riccucci, N.M. 2002. Implementing welfare reform in Michigan: The role of street-level bureaucrats. International Journal of Public Administration. 25, 7 (2002), 901–921.
[220]
Richards, D. and Smith, M.J. 2002. Chapter 1: Introduction: public policy in a changing world. Governance and Public Policy in the UK. Oxford University Press. 1–12.
[221]
Rochefort, D.A. and Cobb, R.W. 1994. The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda. University Press of Kansas.
[222]
Rose, R. 1984. Do Parties Make a Difference?. Macmillan.
[223]
Rose, R. 1993. Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space. Chatham House Publishers.
[224]
Rose, R. and Davies, P.L. 1994. Inheritance in Public Policy: Change Without Choice in Britain. Yale University Press.
[225]
Rothmayr Allison, C. and Saint-Martin, D. 2011. Half a century of ‘muddling’: Are we there yet? Policy and Society. 30, 1 (2011), 1–8.
[226]
Rothstein, B. 1998. Political institutions: an overview. A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford University Press.
[227]
Sabatier, P. and Weible, C. 2014. Theories of the Policy Process. Perseus-Westview Books.
[228]
Sabatier, P. and Weible, C. 2014. Theories of the Policy Process. Perseus-Westview Books.
[229]
Sabatier, P.A. 2007. Chapter 1: The need for better theories. Theories of the policy process. Perseus Running [distributor]. 3–17.
[230]
Sabatier, P.A. 1993. Chapter 2: Policy Change over a Decade or More. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Westview Press. 13–39.
[231]
Sanderson, I. 2002. Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration. 80, 1 (2002), 1–22.
[232]
Sandström, A. and Carlsson, L. 2008. The Performance of Policy Networks: The Relation between Network Structure and Network Performance. Policy Studies Journal. 36, 4 (2008), 497–524.
[233]
Sato, H. 2002. Abolition of Leprosy Isolation Policy in Japan. Policy Termination through Leadership. Policy Studies Journal. 30, 1 (2002), 29–46.
[234]
Sato, H. 1999. The Advocacy Coalition Framework and the Policy Process Analysis: The Case of Smoking Control in Japan. Policy Studies Journal. 27, 1 (1999), 28–44.
[235]
Scheufele, D.A. 2000. Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Poltical Communication. Mass Communication and Society. 3, 2–3 (2000), 297–316.
[236]
Schmidt, V.A. 2012. Give peace a chance: reconciling four (not three) ‘New Institutionalisms’.
[237]
Selznick, P. 1996. Institutionalism ‘Old’ and ‘New’. Administrative Science Quarterly. 41, 2 (1996), 270–277.
[238]
Shawki, N. 2015. Transnationalism and Diffusion: A Study of the Food Sovereignty Movements in the UK and Canada. Globalizations. 12, 5 (2015), 758–773.
[239]
Simon, H.A. 1965. Chapter IV: Rationality in Administrative Behavior. Administrative Behaviour: A Study of Decision-Making Process in Administrative Organisation. Free Press; Collier-Macmillan. 61–78.
[240]
Simon, H.A. 1977. Organizational design: man-machine systems for decision-making. The New Science of Management Decision. Prentice-Hall. 35–50.
[241]
Smith, M.J. 1991. From policy community to issue network: Salmonella in eggs and the new politics of food. Public Administration. 69, 2 (1991), 235–255.
[242]
Sorin, M. 1976. The boundary between public and private policy-making: a reply to Mark V. Nadel. The Journal of Politics. 38, 1 (1976), 159–163.
[243]
Steinmo, S. 1989. Political Institutions and Tax Policy in the United States, Sweden, and Britain. World Politics. 41, 4 (1989), 500–535.
[244]
Stone, D. 2008. Global Public Policy, Transnational Policy Communities, and their Networks. Policy Studies Journal. 36, 1 (2008), 19–38.
[245]
Stone, D. 1999. Learning Lessons and Transferring Policy across Time, Space and Disciplines. Politics. 19, 1 (1999), 51–59.
[246]
Stone, D. 2004. Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy. 11, 3 (2004), 545–566.
[247]
Stone, D. 2012. Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies. 33, 6 (2012), 483–499.
[248]
Street, J. 2012. Do Celebrity Politics and Celebrity Politicians Matter? British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 14, (2012), 346–356.
[249]
Stringer, J.K. and Richardson, J.J. 1980. ‘Managing the Political Agenda: Problem Definition and Policy Making in Britain’ [in] Parliamentary Affairs: A Journal of Comparative Politics. Parliamentary Affairs: A Journal of Comparative Politics. 33, (1980), 23–39.
[250]
Teisman, G.R. 2000. Models For Research into Decision-Making Processes: On Phases, Streams and Decision-Making Rounds. Public Administration. 78, 4 (2000), 937–956.
[251]
Tiernan, A. and Burke, T. 2002. A Load of Old Garbage: Applying Garbage-Can Theory to Contemporary Housing Policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 61, 3 (2002), 86–97.
[252]
Turnpenny, J. et al. 2009. The policy and politics of policy appraisal: emerging trends and new directions. Journal of European Public Policy. 16, 4 (2009), 640–653.
[253]
Walker, R. 2000. Learning if policy will work: the case of New Deal for disabled people. Policy Studies. 21, 4 (2000), 313–332.
[254]
Web of Science: https://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&SID=E3yLlsZ8g1WokXQ7aqs&preferencesSaved=.
[255]
Weible, C.M. et al. 2009. Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Policy Studies Journal. 37, 1 (2009), 121–140.
[256]
Weible, C.M. and Sabatier (eds), P.A. 2018. Theories of the Policy Process. Routledge.
[257]
Weible, C.M. and Sabatier, P.A. eds. 2018. Theories of the Policy Process. Routledge.
[258]
Weimer, D.L. and Vining, A.R. 1999. Chapter 2: What is policy analysis? Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. Prentice Hall. 27–42.
[259]
Weiss, C.H. 1972. Evaluation Research: Methods for Assessing Program Effectiveness. Prentice-Hall.
[260]
Weiss, C.H. 1997. How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway? Evaluation Review. 21, 4 (1997), 501–524.
[261]
Weiss, C.H. 1979. The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review. 39, 5 (1979), 426–431.
[262]
Weiss, C.H. 1993. Where politics and evaluation research meet. Evaluation Practice. 14, 1 (1993), 93–106.
[263]
Wheeler, M. 2013. Celebrity Politics. Polity.
[264]
Williams, N. 2000. Modernising Government: Policy Networks, Competition and the Quest for Efficiency. The Political Quarterly. 71, 4 (2000), 412–421.
[265]
Wise, C.R. and O’Leary, R. 2003. Breaking up is Hard to Do: The Dissolution of Judicial Supervision of Public Services. Public Administration Review. 63, 2 (2003), 177–191.
[266]
Wolfinger, R.E. 1971. ‘Nondecisions and the Study of Local Politics’ [in] The American Political Science Review. The American Political Science Review. 65, 4 (1971), 1063–1080.
[267]
Wolman, H. 1992. Understanding Cross National Policy Transfers: The Case of Britain and the US. Governance. 5, 1 (1992), 27–45.
[268]
Yanovitzky, I. 2002. ‘Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions: A Closer Look Into the Media-Policy Connection’ [in] Communication Research. Communication Research. 29, 4 (2002), 422–451.
[269]
Young, K. et al. 2002. Social science and the evidence-based policy movement. Social Policy and Society. 1, 03 (2002).
[270]
Zito, A.R. 2001. Epistemic communities, collective entrepreneurship and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy. 8, 4 (2001), 585–603.
