1.
Politics and International Relations - LibGuides at University of Exeter [Internet]. Available from: http://libguides.exeter.ac.uk/PoliticsHomePage
2.
Cairney P. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues [Internet]. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004572109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
3.
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
4.
Araral E, Fritzen S, Howlett M, Ramesh M, Xun W. Routledge Handbook of Public Policy [Internet]. 2012. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001810299707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
5.
Dorey P. Policy Making in Britain: An Introduction [Internet]. London: SAGE; 2005. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991000541989707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
6.
Dunn WN. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction [Internet]. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2012. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781317344841
7.
Moran M, Rein M, Goodin RE. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/search?btog=book&isQuickSearch=true&pageSize=10&q=9780199548453&sort=relevance
8.
Knill C, Tosun J. Public Policy: A New Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
9.
Parsons DW. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 1996.
10.
Web of Science [Internet]. Available from: https://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&SID=E3yLlsZ8g1WokXQ7aqs&preferencesSaved=
11.
Cairney P. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues [Internet]. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004572109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
12.
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
13.
Ham C, Hill M. Chapter 1: Policy and Policy Analysis. The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State [Internet]. 2nd ed. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1993. p. 1–21. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3552f4c5-b472-e611-80c6-005056af4099
14.
Hogwood BW. Chapter 1: Making Sense of Policy Activity. From Crisis to Complacency?: Shaping Public Policy in Britain [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987. p. 1–24. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=77c84a05-b972-e611-80c6-005056af4099
15.
Hogwood BW. Chapter 1: A Framework for Analysis. Policy Analysis for the Real World [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1984. p. 3–11. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=98b492fe-ba72-e611-80c6-005056af4099
16.
Hill M. The Policy Process: A Reader [Internet]. 2nd ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall; 1997. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003441239707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
17.
Mark V. Nadel. The Hidden Dimension of Public Policy: Private Governments and the Policy- Making Process. The Journal of Politics. Cambridge University Press; 1975;37(1):2–34.
18.
Nadel MV. Rejoinder to Martin Sorin’s Critique. The Journal of Politics. Cambridge University Press; 1976;38(1):164–165.
19.
Richards D, Smith MJ. Chapter 1: Introduction: public policy in a changing world. Governance and Public Policy in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 1–12.
20.
Sabatier PA. Chapter 1: The need for better theories. Theories of the policy process [Internet]. 2nd ed. Boulder, Colo: Perseus Running [distributor]; 2007. p. 3–17. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0562642f-3175-e611-80c6-005056af4099
21.
Sorin M. The boundary between public and private policy-making: a reply to Mark V. Nadel. The Journal of Politics. Cambridge University Press; 1976;38(1):159–163.
22.
Weimer DL, Vining AR. Chapter 2: What is policy analysis? Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall; 1999. p. 27–42.
23.
Cairney P. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues [Internet]. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004572109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
24.
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
25.
Dorey P. Organized interests and policy networks. Policy Making in Britain: An Introduction [Internet]. London: SAGE; 2005. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?docID=354915&ppg=139
26.
Dowding K. Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach. Political Studies [Internet]. 1995;43(1):136–158. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=9504246414&site=eds-live&scope=site
27.
Hay C, Richards D. The Tangled Webs of Westminster and Whitehall: The Discourse, Strategy and Practice of Networking Within the British Core Executive. Public Administration [Internet]. 2000;78(1):1–28. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=3024263&site=eds-live&scope=site
28.
Heclo H. Chapter 3: Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment. The New American Political System. Washington: American Institute; 1978. p. 87–124.
29.
Hill MJ. The Public Policy Process [Internet]. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003121949707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
30.
Hindmoor A. Explaining Networks through Mechanisms: Vaccination, Priming and the 2001 Foot and Mouth Disease Crisis. Political Studies [Internet]. 2009;57(1):75–94. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=36162180&site=eds-live&scope=site
31.
Ingold K. Network Structures within Policy Processes: Coalitions, Power, and Brokerage in Swiss Climate Policy. Policy Studies Journal [Internet]. 2011;39(3):435–459. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=63478364&site=eds-live&scope=site
32.
Leifeld P, Schneider V. Information Exchange in Policy Networks. American Journal of Political Science [Internet]. 2012;56(3):731–744. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.23316017&site=eds-live&scope=site
33.
Marsh D, Smith M. Understanding Policy Networks: Towards a Dialectical Approach. Political Studies [Internet]. 2000;48(1):4–21. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=2983772&site=eds-live&scope=site
34.
Marsh D, Toke D, Belfrage C, Tepe D, McGough S. Policy networks and the distinction between insider and outsider groups: the case of the Countryside Alliance. Public Administration [Internet]. 2009;87(3):621–638. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=43460549&site=eds-live&scope=site
35.
Page EC. The Insider/Outsider Distinction: An Empirical Investigation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations [Internet]. 1999;1(2):205–214. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=4519055&site=eds-live&scope=site
36.
Weible CM, Sabatier (eds) PA. Theories of the Policy Process [Internet]. Fourth edition. Abingdon: Routledge; 2018. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991008241689707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
37.
Sandström A, Carlsson L. The Performance of Policy Networks: The Relation between Network Structure and Network Performance. Policy Studies Journal [Internet]. 2008;36(4):497–524. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=36108715&site=eds-live&scope=site
38.
Smith MJ. From policy community to issue network: Salmonella in eggs and the new politics of food. Public Administration [Internet]. 1991;69(2):235–255. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=4548959&site=eds-live&scope=site
39.
Williams N. Modernising Government: Policy Networks, Competition and the Quest for Efficiency. The Political Quarterly [Internet]. 2000;71(4):412–421. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=4336104&site=eds-live&scope=site
40.
Hann A. Sharpening up Sabatier: Belief Systems and Public Policy. Politics [Internet]. 1995;15(1):19–26. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edo&AN=ejs42483476&site=eds-live&scope=site
41.
Litfin KT. Advocacy Coalitions Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Globalization and Canadian Climate Change Policy. Policy Studies Journal [Internet]. 2000;28(1):236–252. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=3357211&site=eds-live&scope=site
42.
Sabatier PA. Chapter 2: Policy Change over a Decade or More. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach [Internet]. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press; 1993. p. 13–39. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8679a7ed-ce72-e611-80c6-005056af4099
43.
Sabatier P, Weible C. Theories of the Policy Process [Internet]. Perseus-Westview Books; 2014. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991008373719707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
44.
Sato H. The Advocacy Coalition Framework and the Policy Process Analysis: The Case of Smoking Control in Japan. Policy Studies Journal [Internet]. 1999;27(1):28–44. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000080383600002&site=eds-live&scope=site
45.
Weible CM, Sabatier PA, McQueen K. Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Policy Studies Journal [Internet]. 2009;37(1):121–140. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=36606282&site=eds-live&scope=site
46.
Adler E, Haas PM. Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program. International Organization [Internet]. The MIT Press; 1992;46(1). Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.2706960&site=eds-live&scope=site
47.
Dunlop C. Epistemic Communities: A Reply to Toke. Politics [Internet]. 2000;20(3):137–144. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=3727952&site=eds-live&scope=site
48.
Dunlop CA. Policy transfer as learning: capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2009;30(3):289–311. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=43211253&site=eds-live&scope=site
49.
Araral E, Fritzen S, Howlett M, Ramesh M, Xun W. Routledge Handbook of Public Policy [Internet]. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001810299707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
50.
Haas PM. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization [Internet]. 1992;46(1):1–35. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.2706951&site=eds-live&scope=site
51.
Zito AR. Epistemic communities, collective entrepreneurship and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy [Internet]. 2001;8(4):585–603. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000170358600005&site=eds-live&scope=site
52.
Collins M. The Beatles’ Politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations [Internet]. 2014;16(2):291–309. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswah&AN=000333746700005&site=eds-live&scope=site
53.
Couldry N, Markham T. Celebrity culture and public connection: Bridge or chasm? International Journal of Cultural Studies [Internet]. 2007;10(4):403–421. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=34372387&site=eds-live&scope=site
54.
Farrell N. Celebrity Politics: Bono, Product (RED) and the Legitimising of Philanthrocapitalism. British Journal of Politics and International Relations [Internet]. 2012;14:392–406. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000305888200005&site=eds-live&scope=site
55.
Street J. Do Celebrity Politics and Celebrity Politicians Matter? British Journal of Politics and International Relations [Internet]. 2012;14:346–356. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000305888200002&site=eds-live&scope=site
56.
Wheeler M. Celebrity Politics. Cambridge: Polity; 2013.
57.
Boin A, ’t Hart P, McConnell A. Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public Policy [Internet]. 2009;16(1):81–106. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000261413900005&site=eds-live&scope=site
58.
Downs A. Up and Down with Ecology-the Issue-Attention Cycle. The Public Interest [Internet]. 1972;28(1):65–80. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/pao/docview/1298108041/349C07E4C30F4ABEPQ/1?accountid=10792
59.
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
60.
Bachrach P, Baratz MS. Two Faces of Power. The American Political Science Review. American Political Science Association; 1962;56(4):947–952.
61.
Bell R, Edwards DV, Wagner RH. Political Power: A Reader in Theory and Research. New York: Free Press; 1969.
62.
Bessant J. From ‘harm minimization’ to ‘zero tolerance’ drugs policy in Australia: how the Howard government changed its mind. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2008;29(2):197–214. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=31937596&site=eds-live&scope=site
63.
Cobb MD, Kuklinski JH. Changing Minds: Political Arguments and Political Persuasion. American Journal of Political Science [Internet]. 1997;41(1):88–121. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.2307.2111710&site=eds-live&scope=site
64.
Frederking LC. A comparative study of framing immigration policy after 11 September 2001. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2012;33(4):283–296. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=77508810&site=eds-live&scope=site
65.
Cram L. Whither the Commission? Reform, renewal and the issue-attention cycle. Journal of European Public Policy [Internet]. 2001;8(5):770–786. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000171648300005&site=eds-live&scope=site
66.
Daviter F. Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy [Internet]. 2007;14(4):654–666. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbl&AN=RN209537034&site=eds-live&scope=site
67.
Dery D. Agenda Setting and Problem Definition. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2000;21(1):37–47. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=3788531&site=eds-live&scope=site
68.
Druckman JN. On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? The Journal of Politics [Internet]. The University of Chicago PressSouthern Political Science AssociationThe University of Chicago Press; 2001;63(4):1041–1066. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.2691806&site=eds-live&scope=site
69.
Druckman JN, Nelson KR. Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence. American Journal of Political Science. Midwest Political Science Association; 2003;47(4):729–745.
70.
Dunlop CA. Up and down the pecking order, what matters and when in issue definition: the case of rbST in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy [Internet]. 2007;14(1):39–58. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000244001800003&site=eds-live&scope=site
71.
Hall CM. Travel Safety, Terrorism and the Media: The Significance of the Issue-Attention Cycle. Current Issues in Tourism [Internet]. 2002;5(5):458–466. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edo&AN=ejs18848274&site=eds-live&scope=site
72.
Hill MJ. The Public Policy Process [Internet]. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780273782865
73.
Hogwood BW. Ups and Downs: Is There an Issue-Attention Cycle in Britain? Glasgow: Dept. of Government, University of Strathclyde; 1992.
74.
Majone G. Agenda Setting. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
75.
Rein M. Reframing problematic policies. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199548453-e-018
76.
Scheufele DA. Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Poltical Communication. Mass Communication and Society [Internet]. 2000;3(2–3):297–316. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=3455306&site=eds-live&scope=site
77.
Rochefort DA, Cobb RW. The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda. Lawrence, Kan: University Press of Kansas; 1994.
78.
Baumgartner FR, Green-Pedersen C, Jones BD. ‘Comparative studies of policy agendas’ [in] Journal of European Public Policy. Journal of European Public Policy [Internet]. 2006;13(7):959–974. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13501760600923805#aHR0cDovLzAtd3d3LnRhbmRmb25saW5lLmNvbS5saWIuZXhldGVyLmFjLnVrL2RvaS9wZGYvMTAuMTA4MC8xMzUwMTc2MDYwMDkyMzgwNUBAQDA=
79.
Cairney P. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues [Internet]. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780230356993
80.
Dery D. ‘Agenda Setting and Problem Definition’ [in] Policy Studies. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2000;21(1):37–47. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/014428700114008#aHR0cDovLzAtd3d3LnRhbmRmb25saW5lLmNvbS5saWIuZXhldGVyLmFjLnVrL2RvaS9wZGYvMTAuMTA4MC8wMTQ0Mjg3MDAxMTQwMDhAQEAw
81.
Baumgartner FR, Jones BD. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. 2nd ed. Chicago, Ill: The University of Chicago Press; 2009.
82.
Baumgartner FR, Mahoney C. ‘The Two Faces of Framing: Individual-Level Framing and Collective Issue Definition in the European Union’ [in] European Union Politics. European Union Politics [Internet]. 2008;9(3):435–449. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://eup.sagepub.com/content/9/3/435.full.pdf+html
83.
Baumgartner FR, Breunig C, Green-Pedersen C, Jones BD, Mortensen PB, Nuytemans M, Walgrave S. ‘Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective’ [in] American Journal of Political Science. American Journal of Political Science [Internet]. 2009;53(3):603–620. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/25548140?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
84.
Baumgartner FR, Jones BD, Mortensen PB. ‘Punctuated equilibrium theory: explaining stability and change in public policymaking’ [in] Theories of the Policy Process. In: Weible CM, Sabatier PA, editors. Theories of the Policy Process [Internet]. Fourth edition. Abingdon: Routledge; 2018. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780429494284
85.
Crenson MA. The Un-Politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non-Decisionmaking in the Cities. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press; 1971.
86.
Henry GT, Gordon CS. ‘Tracking Issue Attention: Specifying the Dynamics of the Public Agenda’ [in] The Public Opinion Quarterly. The Public Opinion Quarterly. Oxford University Press; 65(2):157–177.
87.
Hill MJ. The Public Policy Process. 5th ed. Harlow: Pearson Longman; 2009.
88.
Jensen C. ‘Focusing events, policy dictators and the dynamics of reform’ [in] Policy Studies. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2011;32(2):143–158. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01442872.2010.541772
89.
Jones BD, Baumgartner FR. Chapter 1: ‘How government processes information and prioritizes problems’ [in] The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 2005. p. 1–27.
90.
Nelson TE, Cawson RA, Oxley ZM. ‘Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance’ [in] The American Political Science Review. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 1997;91(3):567–583. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.2952075&site=eds-live&scope=site
91.
O’Riordan T. ‘Stability and transformation in environmental government’ [in] Political Quarterly. The Political Quarterly [Internet]. 1991;62(2):167–185. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1991.tb00851.x
92.
Parsons DW. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 1996.
93.
Peters BG, Hogwood BW. ‘In Search of the Issue-Attention Cycle’ [in] The Journal of Politics. The Journal of Politics. Cambridge University Press; 1985;47(1):238–253.
94.
Stringer JK, Richardson JJ. ‘Managing the Political Agenda: Problem Definition and Policy Making in Britain’ [in] Parliamentary Affairs: A Journal of Comparative Politics. Parliamentary Affairs: A Journal of Comparative Politics [Internet]. Oxford: OUP; 1980;33:23–39. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://academic.oup.com/pa/article/33/1/23/1456825?searchresult=1
95.
Sabatier P, Weible C. Theories of the Policy Process [Internet]. Perseus-Westview Books; 2014. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780813349275
96.
Wolfinger RE. ‘Nondecisions and the Study of Local Politics’ [in] The American Political Science Review. The American Political Science Review. American Political Science Association; 1971;65(4):1063–1080.
97.
Yanovitzky I. ‘Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions: A Closer Look Into the Media-Policy Connection’ [in] Communication Research. Communication Research [Internet]. 2002;29(4):422–451. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000176915400003&site=eds-live&scope=site
98.
Cairney P. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues [Internet]. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004572109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
99.
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
100.
Davis OA, Dempster M, Wildavsky A. A Theory of the Budgetary Process. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 1966;60(3):529–547. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.2307.1952969&site=eds-live&scope=site
101.
Dempster MAH, Wildavsky A. On Change: Or There is No Magic Size for an Increment. Political Studies [Internet]. 1979;27(3):371–389. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=14348734&site=eds-live&scope=site
102.
Gregory R. Political rationality or incrementalism. The Public Policy Process [Internet]. Seventh edition. London: Routledge; 2016. Available from: https://shibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&target=https%3A%2F%2Fshibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net%2Fshib%3Fdest%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.vlebooks.com%252FSHIBBOLETH%253Fdest%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.vlebooks.com%25252Fvleweb%25252Fproduct%25252Fopenreader%25253Fid%25253DExeter%252526isbn%25253D9781317438076
103.
Ham C, Hill M. The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State. 2nd ed. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1993.
104.
Hogwood BW. Chapter 1: Making sense of policy activity. From Crisis to Complacency? New York: Oxford University Press; 1987. p. 1–24.
105.
Jenkins B. ‘Policy analysis: models and approaches’ [in] The Public Policy Process. The Public Policy Process [Internet]. Seventh edition. London: Routledge; 2016. Available from: https://shibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&target=https%3A%2F%2Fshibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net%2Fshib%3Fdest%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.vlebooks.com%252FSHIBBOLETH%253Fdest%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.vlebooks.com%25252Fvleweb%25252Fproduct%25252Fopenreader%25253Fid%25253DExeter%252526isbn%25253D9781317438076
106.
Leach S. Chapter 1: In Defence of the Rational Model. Approaches in Public Policy. London: Allen & Unwin for the Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham; 1982. p. 6–23.
107.
Lindblom CE. The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review. Wiley-Blackwell; 1959;19(2):79–88.
108.
Lindblom CE. Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. Public Administration Review. Wiley-Blackwell; 1979;39(6):517–526.
109.
Mintz A. Applied Decision Analysis: Utilizing Poliheuristic Theory to Explain and Predict Foreign Policy and National Security Decisions. International Studies Perspectives [Internet]. 2005;6(1):94–98. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.44218354&site=eds-live&scope=site
110.
Parsons DW. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 1996.
111.
Rothmayr Allison C, Saint-Martin D. Half a century of ‘muddling’: Are we there yet? Policy and Society [Internet]. 2011;30(1):1–8. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselp&AN=S1449403510000512&site=eds-live&scope=site
112.
Simon HA. Chapter IV: Rationality in Administrative Behavior. Administrative Behaviour: A Study of Decision-Making Process in Administrative Organisation [Internet]. 2nd ed. reprinted. New York: Free Press; Collier-Macmillan; 1965. p. 61–78. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ceb858dc-b276-e611-80c6-005056af4099
113.
Simon HA. Organizational design: man-machine systems for decision-making. The New Science of Management Decision [Internet]. Revised ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1977. p. 35–50. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d01be381-e875-e611-80c6-005056af4099
114.
Hill M. The Policy Process: A Reader [Internet]. 2nd ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall; 1997. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003441239707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
115.
Teisman GR. Models For Research into Decision-Making Processes: On Phases, Streams and Decision-Making Rounds. Public Administration [Internet]. 2000;78(4):937–956. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=4673765&site=eds-live&scope=site
116.
Breunig C, Koski C. The Tortoise or the Hare? Incrementalism, Punctuations, and Their Consequences. Policy Studies Journal [Internet]. 2012;40(1):45–68. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ecn&AN=1298119&site=eds-live&scope=site
117.
Cohen MD, March J, Olsen J. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly. Sage Publications, Inc.; 1972;17(1):1–25.
118.
Cyert RM, March JG. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Business; 1992.
119.
Greener I. The three moments of New Labour’s health policy discourse. Policy and Politics. Bristol: School for Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol; 2004;32(3):303–316.
120.
Kingdon JW. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies [Internet]. Second edition. Harlow, Essex: Pearson; 2014. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001253609707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
121.
March JG, Olsen JP. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget; 1976.
122.
Mucciaroni G. The Garbage Can Model & the Study of Policy Making: A Critique. Polity. Palgrave Macmillan Journals; 1992;24(3):459–482.
123.
Paton C. Garbage-can policy-making meets neo-liberal ideology: twenty five years of redundant reform of the English National Health Service. Social Policy & Administration [Internet]. 2014;48(3):319–342. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=95771823&site=eds-live&scope=site
124.
Tiernan A, Burke T. A Load of Old Garbage: Applying Garbage-Can Theory to Contemporary Housing Policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration [Internet]. 2002;61(3):86–97. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=7164276&site=eds-live&scope=site
125.
Cairney P. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues [Internet]. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004572109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
126.
Dunlop C. How Policy Elites Learn and Why Policy Legacies Matter: A Process Analysis of Gay Marriage Legalization in England and Wales [Internet]. Council For European Studies; 2014. Available from: http://readinglists.exeter.ac.uk/Resource List Odd Links/POL2060/POL2060_40.pdf
127.
Ferris JM, Tang SY. The New Institutionalism and Public Administration: An Overview. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART. Oxford University Press; 1993;3(1):4–10.
128.
Hall PA, Taylor RCR. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies [Internet]. 1996;44(5):936–957. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=9705162186&site=eds-live&scope=site
129.
Hill M. Chapter 7: The Policy Process as an Organisational Process. The Policy Process in the Modern State [Internet]. 3rd ed. London: Prentice Hall; 1997. p. 153–176. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=44a9acd0-413d-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
130.
Hill MJ. The Public Policy Process [Internet]. Seventh edition. London: Routledge; 2016. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004264219707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
131.
Janis IL. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1982.
132.
Janis IL, Mann L. Decision-Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. London: The Free Press; 1977.
133.
John P. Analysing Public Policy [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2012. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001264389707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
134.
Lowndes V. Chapter 4: Institutionalism. Theory and Methods in Political Science. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2002. p. 90–108.
135.
March JG, Olsen JP. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. The American Political Science Review. American Political Science Association; 1984;78(3):734–749.
136.
March JG, Olsen JP. Chapter 1: Elaborating the ‘New Institutionalism’. The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991000514369707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
137.
North DC. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003235039707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
138.
Parsons DW. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 1996.
139.
Peters BG. Political institutions: old and new. A New Handbook of Political Science [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. Available from: https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198294719.001.0001/acprof-9780198294719-chapter-7
140.
Rhodes RAW. Chapter 4: The institutional approach. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1997. p. 63–84.
141.
Rothstein B. Political institutions: an overview. A New Handbook of Political Science [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. Available from: https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198294719.001.0001/acprof-9780198294719-chapter-4
142.
Schmidt VA. Give peace a chance: reconciling four (not three) ‘New Institutionalisms’ [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://readinglists.exeter.ac.uk/Resource List Odd Links/POL1044/POL1044_01.pdf
143.
Selznick P. Institutionalism ‘Old’ and ‘New’. Administrative Science Quarterly. Sage Publications, Inc.; 1996;41(2):270–277.
144.
Cairney P. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues [Internet]. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004572109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
145.
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
146.
Asare BE, Studlar DT. Lesson-drawing and public policy: secondhand smoking restrictions in Scotland and England. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2009;30(3):365–382. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=43211259&site=eds-live&scope=site
147.
Atikcan EÖ. Diffusion in Referendum Campaigns: The Case of EU Constitutional Referendums. Journal of European Integration [Internet]. 2015;37(4):451–470. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000352698800003&site=eds-live&scope=site
148.
Bennett CJ. Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross-National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability. Governance [Internet]. 1997;10(3):213–233. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=A1997XM82200001&site=eds-live&scope=site
149.
Benson D, Jordan A. Policy Transfer Research: Still Evolving, Not Yet Through? Political Studies Review [Internet]. 2012;10(3):333–338. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00273.x
150.
Carroll P, Common R. Policy Transfer and Learning in Public Policy and Management: International Contexts, Content and Development. London: Routledge; 2013.
151.
Clarke J, Bainton D, Lendvai N, Stubbs P. Making Policy Move: Towards a Politics of Translation and Assemblage [Internet]. Bristol: Policy Press; 2015. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001068979707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
152.
Carroll P, Common R. Policy Transfer and Learning in Public Policy and Management: International Contexts, Content and Development. London: Routledge; 2013.
153.
Dolowitz D, Marsh D. Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature. Political Studies [Internet]. 1996;44(2):343–357. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=9607113359&site=eds-live&scope=site
154.
Dolowitz DP, Marsh D. Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance [Internet]. 2000;13(1):5–23. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=3556331&site=eds-live&scope=site
155.
Dunlop CA. Policy transfer as learning: capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2009;30(3):289–311. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=43211253&site=eds-live&scope=site
156.
Dunlop CA. Principal-Agent Modelling and Learning: The European Commission, Experts and Agricultural Hormone Growth Promoters. Public Policy and Administration. London: Joint University Council, Public Administration Committee; 2009;30(3):291–313.
157.
Dunlop CA, Radaelli CM. Systematising Policy Learning: From Monolith to Dimensions. Political Studies [Internet]. 2013;61(3):599–619. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=89944812&site=eds-live&scope=site
158.
Evans M. Policy Transfer in Critical Perspective. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2009;30(3):243–268. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=43211255&site=eds-live&scope=site
159.
Freeman R. Learning in public policy. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199548453-e-017
160.
James O, Lodge M. The Limitations of ‘Policy Transfer’ and ‘Lesson Drawing’ for Public Policy Research. Political Studies Review [Internet]. 2003;1(2):179–193. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=9614857&site=eds-live&scope=site
161.
Manwaring R. The Big Society in Australia: A Case of ‘Non’-Policy Transfer? Australian Journal of Public Administration [Internet]. 2016;75(2):191–201. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=115831483&site=eds-live&scope=site
162.
Moss P. Sure start. Journal of Education Policy [Internet]. 2004;19(5):631–634. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ681764&site=eds-live&scope=site
163.
Peck J. Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography [Internet]. 2011;35(6):773–797. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eih&AN=67513921&site=eds-live&scope=site
164.
Peck J, Theodore N. Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism [Internet]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2015. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001068879707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
165.
Rose R. Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space. Chatham, N.J: Chatham House Publishers; 1993.
166.
Shawki N. Transnationalism and Diffusion: A Study of the Food Sovereignty Movements in the UK and Canada. Globalizations [Internet]. 2015;12(5):758–773. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eih&AN=108976634&site=eds-live&scope=site
167.
Weible CM, Sabatier PA, editors. Theories of the Policy Process [Internet]. Fourth edition. Abingdon: Routledge; 2018. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991008241689707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
168.
Stone D. Learning Lessons and Transferring Policy across Time, Space and Disciplines. Politics [Internet]. 1999;19(1):51–59. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=3253928&site=eds-live&scope=site
169.
Stone D. Global Public Policy, Transnational Policy Communities, and their Networks. Policy Studies Journal [Internet]. 2008;36(1):19–38. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=32089528&site=eds-live&scope=site
170.
Stone D. Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2012;33(6):483–499. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000310737200002&site=eds-live&scope=site
171.
Wolman H. Understanding Cross National Policy Transfers: The Case of Britain and the US. Governance [Internet]. 1992;5(1):27–45. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=64302407&site=eds-live&scope=site
172.
Arentsen MJ, Bressers HThA, O’Toole LJ. Institutional and Policy Responses to Uncertainty in Environmental Policy: A Comparison of Dutch and U.S. Styles. Policy Studies Journal [Internet]. 2000;28(3):597–611. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=3944404&site=eds-live&scope=site
173.
Baggot R. From Confrontation to Consultation? Pressure Group Relations From Thatcher to Major. Parliamentary Affairs [Internet]. 1995;48:484–502. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswst&AN=edswst.408347&site=eds-live&scope=site
174.
Cairney P. The New British Policy Style: From a British to a Scottish Political Tradition? Political Studies Review [Internet]. 2011;9(2):208–220. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000289299200006&site=eds-live&scope=site
175.
Freeman GP. National Styles and Policy Sectors: Explaining Structured Variation. Journal of Public Policy. Cambridge University Press; 1985;5(4):467–496.
176.
Hay C. Globalization and public policy. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199548453-e-029
177.
Hayward J. National Aptitudes for Planning in Britain, France, and Italy. Government and Opposition [Internet]. 1974;9(4):397–410. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.44482280&site=eds-live&scope=site
178.
Heidenheimer AJ, Heclo H, Adams CT. Comparative Public Policy: The Politics of Social Choice in Europe and America. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan; 1983.
179.
Hennessy P. The Blair Style of Government: An Historical Perspective and an Interim Audit. Government and Opposition [Internet]. 1998;33(1):3–20. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.44484074&site=eds-live&scope=site
180.
Hennessy P. The Blair Government in Historical Perspective: An Analysis of the Power Relationships within New Labour. History Today. London: History Today; 2002;52(1):21–25.
181.
Howlett M. Administrative styles and the Iimits of administrative reform: A neo-institutional analysis of administrative cuIture. Canadian Public Administration/Administration Publique du Canada [Internet]. 2003;46(4):471–494. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb01588.x
182.
Jordan AG, Richardson JJ. Chapter 4: The British Policy Style or the Logic of Negotiation. Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: Allen & Unwin; 1982. p. 80–110.
183.
Knill C. European Policies: The Impact of National Administrative Traditions. Journal of Public Policy [Internet]. 1998;18(1):1–28. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.4007599&site=eds-live&scope=site
184.
Maassen P, Moen E, Stensaker B. Reforming higher education in the Netherlands and Norway: the role of the state and national modes of governance. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2011;32(5):479–495. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=65928216&site=eds-live&scope=site
185.
Mamudu H, Cairney P, Studlar D. 'Global Public Policy’: Does the New Venue for Transnational Tobacco Control Challenge the Old Way of Doing Things? Public Administration [Internet]. 2015; Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=112050732&site=eds-live&scope=site
186.
Maioni A. Parting at the Crossroads: The Development of Health Insurance in Canada and the United States, 1940-1965. Comparative Politics. Ph.D. Program in Political Science of the City University of New York; 1997;29(4):411–431.
187.
Reinicke WH. Global Public Policy. Foreign Affairs. Council on Foreign Relations; 1997;76(6):127–138.
188.
Steinmo S. Political Institutions and Tax Policy in the United States, Sweden, and Britain. World Politics. Cambridge University Press; 1989;41(4):500–535.
189.
Stone D. Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy [Internet]. 2004;11(3):545–566. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000222470200008&site=eds-live&scope=site
190.
Geva-May I. Riding the Wave of Opportunity: Termination in Public Policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory [Internet]. 2004;14(3):309–333. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.3525839&site=eds-live&scope=site
191.
Howlett M. Pages 191-192: The Outcomes of Policy Evaluation: Policy Feedback and Policy Termination. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems [Internet]. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 191–192. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1fc78e34-0b3a-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
192.
Hogwood BW, Peters BG. Policy Dynamics. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books; 1983.
193.
Lindblom CE. The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review. Wiley-Blackwell; 1959;19(2):79–88.
194.
Patashnik EM. Ideas, Inheritances, and the Dynamics of Budgetary Change. Governance [Internet]. 1999;12(2):147–174. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=3253567&site=eds-live&scope=site
195.
Pierson P. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. The American Political Science Review. American Political Science Association; 2000;94(2):251–267.
196.
Rose R. Do Parties Make a Difference? Expanded 2nd ed. London: Macmillan; 1984.
197.
Rose R, Davies PL. Inheritance in Public Policy: Change Without Choice in Britain [Internet]. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1994. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004284939707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
198.
Bardach E. Policy Termination as a Political Process. Policy Sciences. Springer; 1976;7(2):123–131.
199.
Bothun D, Comer JC. The Politics of Termination: Concepts and Process. Policy Studies Journal [Internet]. 1979;7(3):540–553. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=12337589&site=eds-live&scope=site
200.
Brewer GD. Termination: Hard Choices, Harder Questions. Public Administration Review. Wiley-Blackwell; 1978;38(4):338–344.
201.
Daniels MR. Organizational Termination and Policy Continuation: Closing the Oklahoma Public Training Schools. Policy Sciences. Springer; 1995;28(3):301–316.
202.
de Leon P. Public Policy Termination: An End and a Beginning. Policy Analysis [Internet]. 1978;4(3):369–392. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.42783546&site=eds-live&scope=site
203.
Dommett K, Skelcher C. Opening the Black Box of Administrative Reform: A Strategic-Relational Analysis. International Public Management Journal [Internet]. 2014;17(4):540–563. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000346063800005&site=eds-live&scope=site
204.
Frantz JE. Reviving and Revising a Termination Model. Policy Sciences. Springer; 1992;25(2):175–189.
205.
Frantz JE. Political Resources for Policy Terminators. Policy Studies Journal [Internet]. 2002;30(1):11–28. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=6981132&site=eds-live&scope=site
206.
Graddy EA, Ye K. When Do We ‘Just Say No’? Policy Termination Decisions in Local Hospital Services. Policy Studies Journal [Internet]. 2008;36(2):219–242. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=31625495&site=eds-live&scope=site
207.
Jordan A, Bauer MW, Green-Pedersen C. Policy dismantling. Journal of European Public Policy [Internet]. 2013;20(5):795–805. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000318151200010&site=eds-live&scope=site
208.
Jordana J. Multiple Crises and Policy Dismantling in Spain: Political Strategies and Distributive Implications. Political Studies Review [Internet]. 2014;12(2):224–238. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000333833100005&site=eds-live&scope=site
209.
O’Leary C. Agency Termination in the UK: What Explains the ‘Bonfire of the Quangos’? West European Politics [Internet]. 2015;38(6):1327–1344. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402382.2015.1010273
210.
Parsons WD. Pages 570-579. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis [Internet]. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 1996. p. 570–579. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a4987ce9-c03a-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
211.
Sato H. Abolition of Leprosy Isolation Policy in Japan. Policy Termination through Leadership. Policy Studies Journal [Internet]. 2002;30(1):29–46. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=6981155&site=eds-live&scope=site
212.
Wise CR, O’Leary R. Breaking up is Hard to Do: The Dissolution of Judicial Supervision of Public Services. Public Administration Review [Internet]. 2003;63(2):177–191. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=9199204&site=eds-live&scope=site
213.
Hill MJ, Hupe PL. Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and Practice [Internet]. London: Sage; 2002. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=37015&entityid=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
214.
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
215.
Anderson JE. Public Policy-Making. London: Nelson; 1975.
216.
Birrell D. Devolution and quangos in the United Kingdom: the implementation of principles and policies for rationalisation and democratisation. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2008;29(1):35–49. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=30024654&site=eds-live&scope=site
217.
Browne A, Wildavsky A. Chapter 10: Implementation as Mutual Adjustment. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland [Internet]. 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1984. p. 206–231. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3d081cfd-9e76-e611-80c6-005056af4099
218.
Burch M, Wood B. Chapter 7: The Products of Government: Carrying out Intentions. Public Policy in Britain. Oxford: Robertson; 1983. p. 167–192.
219.
Forbes T, Evans D, Scott N. Implementing health and social care policy – England and Scotland compared. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2010;31(6):591–611. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=55309034&site=eds-live&scope=site
220.
Fyfe G, Johnston Miller K, McTavish D. 'Muddling through’ in a devolved polity: implementation of equal opportunities policy in Scotland. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2009;30(2):203–219. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=37840442&site=eds-live&scope=site
221.
Hill M. Implementation Theory: Yesterday’s Issue? Policy and Politics. Bristol: School for Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol; 1997;25(4):375–385.
222.
Hill MJ. The Public Policy Process [Internet]. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003121949707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
223.
Hogwood BW, Gunn LA. Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1984.
224.
Howlett M. Chapter 7: Policy Implementation. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems [Internet]. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 160–177. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c023ff1d-0f3a-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
225.
Hupe PL. The Thesis of Incongruent Implementation: Revisiting Pressman and Wildavsky. Public Policy and Administration [Internet]. 2011;26(1):63–80. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=60978946&site=eds-live&scope=site
226.
Hupe P. What happens on the ground: Persistent issues in implementation research. Public Policy and Administration [Internet]. 2014;29(2):164–182. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000209645700006&site=eds-live&scope=site
227.
Hupe P, Hill M, Nangia M. Studying implementation beyond deficit analysis: The top-down view reconsidered. Public Policy and Administration [Internet]. 2014;29(2):145–163. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000209645700005&site=eds-live&scope=site
228.
James S. Chapter 5: Implementation and policy review. British Government: A Reader in Policy Making. London: Routledge; 1997. p. 152–170.
229.
Parsons DW. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 1996.
230.
Riccucci NM. Implementing welfare reform in Michigan: The role of street-level bureaucrats. International Journal of Public Administration [Internet]. 2002;25(7):901–921. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=7086659&site=eds-live&scope=site
231.
Allen C. ‘They just don’t live and breathe the policy like we do…’: Policy intentions and practice dilemmas in modern social policy and implementation networks. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2001;22(3–4):149–166. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=5706948&site=eds-live&scope=site
232.
Anderson JE. Public Policy-Making. London: Nelson; 1975.
233.
Beletsky L, Macalino GE, Burris S. Attitudes of police officers towards syringe access, occupational needle-sticks, and drug use: A qualitative study of one city police department in the United States. International Journal of Drug Policy [Internet]. 2005;16(4):267–274. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselp&AN=S0955395905000502&site=eds-live&scope=site
234.
Dunér A, Nordström M. The discretion and power of street-level bureaucrats: an example from Swedish municipal eldercare. European Journal of Social Work [Internet]. 2006;9(4):425–444. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105936431&site=eds-live&scope=site
235.
Gunn LA. Why is implementation so difficult? Management Services in Government [Internet]. London: HMSO; 1978;33:169–176. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=20a52578-a676-e611-80c6-005056af4099
236.
Hill M. The Policy Process in the Modern State. 3rd ed. London: Prentice Hall; 1997.
237.
Hogwood BW. From Crisis to Complacency?: Shaping Public Policy in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987.
238.
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
239.
James S. Chapter 5: Implementation and policy review. British Government: A Reader in Policy Making. London: Routledge; 1997. p. 152–169.
240.
Jackson PM. Chapter 2: Economic policy. Implementing Thatcherite Policies: Audit of an Era. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1992. p. 11–31.
241.
May PJ. Implementation failures revisited: Policy regime perspectives. Public Policy and Administration [Internet]. 2015;30(3–4):277–299. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000371128400005&site=eds-live&scope=site
242.
Parsons DW. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 1996.
243.
Davies H, Nutley S, Walter I. Academic Advice to Practitioners? The Role and Use of Research-Based Evidence. Public Money and Management [Internet]. 2007;27(4):232–235. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=26149332&site=eds-live&scope=site
244.
Dunlop CA. The temporal dimension of knowledge and the limits of policy appraisal: biofuels policy in the UK. Policy Sciences [Internet]. 2009;43(4):343–363. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.40926879&site=eds-live&scope=site
245.
Nutley SM, Homel P. Delivering evidence-based practice: lessons from the implementation of the UK Crime Reduction Programme. Evidence and Policy. Bristol: Policy Press; 2008;2(1):5–26.
246.
Radaelli CM. The role of knowledge in the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy. London: Routledge; 1995;2(2):159–183.
247.
Young K, Ashby D, Boaz A, Grayson L. Social science and the evidence-based policy movement. Social Policy and Society [Internet]. 2002;1(03). Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&pdftype=1&fid=110010&jid=SPS&volumeId=1&issueId=03&aid=110009
248.
Bovens M, ’T Hart P, Kuipers S. The politics of policy evaluation. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199548453-e-015
249.
Burch M, Wood B. Public Policy in Britain. Oxford: Robertson; 1983.
250.
Dunlop C, Fritsch O, Radaelli C. The appraisal of policy appraisal – learning about impact assessment. 2014; Available from: https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/16900
251.
Hill MJ. The Public Policy Process [Internet]. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780273782865
252.
Hogwood BW. From Crisis to Complacency?: Shaping Public Policy in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987.
253.
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
254.
National Audit Office. Measuring Performance in Government Departments HC 301 Parliamentary Session 2000-01.
255.
Owens S, Rayner T, Bina O. New agendas for appraisal: reflections on theory, practice, and research. Environment and Planning A [Internet]. 2004;36(11):1943–1959. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ecn&AN=0761177&site=eds-live&scope=site
256.
Palumbo DJ, Nachmias D. The preconditions for successful evaluation: is there an ideal paradigm? Policy Sciences. Springer; 1983;16(1):67–79.
257.
Parsons DW. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 1996.
258.
Pollitt C. Occasional excursions: a brief history of policy evaluation in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs: A Journal of Comparative Politics. Oxford: OUP; 1993;46:353–362.
259.
Radin B. Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press; 2000.
260.
Sanderson I. Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration [Internet]. 2002;80(1):1–22. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9299.00292
261.
Turnpenny J, Radaelli CM, Jordan A, Jacob K. The policy and politics of policy appraisal: emerging trends and new directions. Journal of European Public Policy [Internet]. 2009;16(4):640–653. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000266090500010&site=eds-live&scope=site
262.
Jordan A, Turnpenny J. The Tools of Policy Formulation [Internet]. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2015. Available from: http://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781783477036.xml
263.
Walker R. Learning if policy will work: the case of New Deal for disabled people. Policy Studies [Internet]. 2000;21(4):313–332. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=3954574&site=eds-live&scope=site
264.
Weiss CH. How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway? Evaluation Review [Internet]. 1997;21(4):501–524. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=9710013300&site=eds-live&scope=site
265.
Weiss CH. Evaluation Research: Methods for Assessing Program Effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall; 1972.
266.
Weiss CH. The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review [Internet]. 1979;39(5):426–431. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=4601599&site=eds-live&scope=site
267.
Weiss CH. Where politics and evaluation research meet. Evaluation Practice [Internet]. 1993;14(1):93–106. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=53078512&site=eds-live&scope=site
268.
Boin A, McConnell A, ’t Hart P. Governing After Crisis: The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. Available from: https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991000861029707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
269.
Marsh D, McConnell A. Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public Administration [Internet]. 2010;88(2):564–583. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=51374892&site=eds-live&scope=site
270.
Moran M. Not steering but drowning: policy catastrophes and the regulatory state. The Political Quarterly [Internet]. 2001;72(4):414–427. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=5327002&site=eds-live&scope=site
