1.
Politics and International Relations - LibGuides at University of Exeter, http://libguides.exeter.ac.uk/PoliticsHomePage.
2.
Cairney, P.: Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2012).
3.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., Perl, A.: Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
4.
Araral, E., Fritzen, S., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., Xun, W.: Routledge Handbook of Public Policy. (2012).
5.
Dorey, P.: Policy Making in Britain: An Introduction. SAGE, London (2005).
6.
Dunn, W.N.: Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Pearson, Boston (2012).
7.
Moran, M., Rein, M., Goodin, R.E.: The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
8.
Knill, C., Tosun, J.: Public Policy: A New Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
9.
Parsons, D.W.: Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar, Aldershot (1996).
10.
Web of Science, https://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&SID=E3yLlsZ8g1WokXQ7aqs&preferencesSaved=.
11.
Cairney, P.: Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2012).
12.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., Perl, A.: Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
13.
Ham, C., Hill, M.: Chapter 1: Policy and Policy Analysis. In: The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State. pp. 1–21. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York (1993).
14.
Hogwood, B.W.: Chapter 1: Making Sense of Policy Activity. In: From Crisis to Complacency?: Shaping Public Policy in Britain. pp. 1–24. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987).
15.
Hogwood, B.W.: Chapter 1: A Framework for Analysis. In: Policy Analysis for the Real World. pp. 3–11. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1984).
16.
Hill, M.: The Policy Process: A Reader. Prentice Hall, Harlow (1997).
17.
Mark V. Nadel: The Hidden Dimension of Public Policy: Private Governments and the Policy- Making Process. The Journal of Politics. 37, 2–34 (1975).
18.
Nadel, M.V.: Rejoinder to Martin Sorin’s Critique. The Journal of Politics. 38, 164–165 (1976).
19.
Richards, D., Smith, M.J.: Chapter 1: Introduction: public policy in a changing world. In: Governance and Public Policy in the UK. pp. 1–12. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002).
20.
Sabatier, P.A.: Chapter 1: The need for better theories. In: Theories of the policy process. pp. 3–17. Perseus Running [distributor], Boulder, Colo (2007).
21.
Sorin, M.: The boundary between public and private policy-making: a reply to Mark V. Nadel. The Journal of Politics. 38, 159–163 (1976).
22.
Weimer, D.L., Vining, A.R.: Chapter 2: What is policy analysis? In: Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. pp. 27–42. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. (1999).
23.
Cairney, P.: Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2012).
24.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., Perl, A.: Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
25.
Dorey, P.: Organized interests and policy networks. In: Policy Making in Britain: An Introduction. SAGE, London (2005).
26.
Dowding, K.: Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach. Political Studies. 43, 136–158 (1995).
27.
Hay, C., Richards, D.: The Tangled Webs of Westminster and Whitehall: The Discourse, Strategy and Practice of Networking Within the British Core Executive. Public Administration. 78, 1–28 (2000).
28.
Heclo, H.: Chapter 3: Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment. In: The New American Political System. pp. 87–124. American Institute, Washington (1978).
29.
Hill, M.J.: The Public Policy Process. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
30.
Hindmoor, A.: Explaining Networks through Mechanisms: Vaccination, Priming and the 2001 Foot and Mouth Disease Crisis. Political Studies. 57, 75–94 (2009).
31.
Ingold, K.: Network Structures within Policy Processes: Coalitions, Power, and Brokerage in Swiss Climate Policy. Policy Studies Journal. 39, 435–459 (2011).
32.
Leifeld, P., Schneider, V.: Information Exchange in Policy Networks. American Journal of Political Science. 56, 731–744 (2012).
33.
Marsh, D., Smith, M.: Understanding Policy Networks: Towards a Dialectical Approach. Political Studies. 48, 4–21 (2000).
34.
Marsh, D., Toke, D., Belfrage, C., Tepe, D., McGough, S.: Policy networks and the distinction between insider and outsider groups: the case of the Countryside Alliance. Public Administration. 87, 621–638 (2009).
35.
Page, E.C.: The Insider/Outsider Distinction: An Empirical Investigation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 1, 205–214 (1999).
36.
Weible, C.M., Sabatier (eds), P.A.: Theories of the Policy Process. Routledge, Abingdon (2018).
37.
Sandström, A., Carlsson, L.: The Performance of Policy Networks: The Relation between Network Structure and Network Performance. Policy Studies Journal. 36, 497–524 (2008).
38.
Smith, M.J.: From policy community to issue network: Salmonella in eggs and the new politics of food. Public Administration. 69, 235–255 (1991).
39.
Williams, N.: Modernising Government: Policy Networks, Competition and the Quest for Efficiency. The Political Quarterly. 71, 412–421 (2000).
40.
Hann, A.: Sharpening up Sabatier: Belief Systems and Public Policy. Politics. 15, 19–26 (1995).
41.
Litfin, K.T.: Advocacy Coalitions Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Globalization and Canadian Climate Change Policy. Policy Studies Journal. 28, 236–252 (2000).
42.
Sabatier, P.A.: Chapter 2: Policy Change over a Decade or More. In: Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. pp. 13–39. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo (1993).
43.
Sabatier, P., Weible, C.: Theories of the Policy Process. Perseus-Westview Books (2014).
44.
Sato, H.: The Advocacy Coalition Framework and the Policy Process Analysis: The Case of Smoking Control in Japan. Policy Studies Journal. 27, 28–44 (1999).
45.
Weible, C.M., Sabatier, P.A., McQueen, K.: Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Policy Studies Journal. 37, 121–140 (2009).
46.
Adler, E., Haas, P.M.: Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program. International Organization. 46, (1992).
47.
Dunlop, C.: Epistemic Communities: A Reply to Toke. Politics. 20, 137–144 (2000).
48.
Dunlop, C.A.: Policy transfer as learning: capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies. 30, 289–311 (2009).
49.
Araral, E., Fritzen, S., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., Xun, W.: Routledge Handbook of Public Policy.
50.
Haas, P.M.: Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization. 46, 1–35 (1992).
51.
Zito, A.R.: Epistemic communities, collective entrepreneurship and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy. 8, 585–603 (2001).
52.
Collins, M.: The Beatles’ Politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 16, 291–309 (2014).
53.
Couldry, N., Markham, T.: Celebrity culture and public connection: Bridge or chasm? International Journal of Cultural Studies. 10, 403–421 (2007).
54.
Farrell, N.: Celebrity Politics: Bono, Product (RED) and the Legitimising of Philanthrocapitalism. British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 14, 392–406 (2012).
55.
Street, J.: Do Celebrity Politics and Celebrity Politicians Matter? British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 14, 346–356 (2012).
56.
Wheeler, M.: Celebrity Politics. Polity, Cambridge (2013).
57.
Boin, A., ’t Hart, P., McConnell, A.: Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public Policy. 16, 81–106 (2009).
58.
Downs, A.: Up and Down with Ecology-the Issue-Attention Cycle. The Public Interest. 28, 65–80 (1972).
59.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., Perl, A.: Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
60.
Bachrach, P., Baratz, M.S.: Two Faces of Power. The American Political Science Review. 56, 947–952 (1962).
61.
Bell, R., Edwards, D.V., Wagner, R.H.: Political Power: A Reader in Theory and Research. Free Press, New York (1969).
62.
Bessant, J.: From ‘harm minimization’ to ‘zero tolerance’ drugs policy in Australia: how the Howard government changed its mind. Policy Studies. 29, 197–214 (2008).
63.
Cobb, M.D., Kuklinski, J.H.: Changing Minds: Political Arguments and Political Persuasion. American Journal of Political Science. 41, 88–121 (1997).
64.
Frederking, L.C.: A comparative study of framing immigration policy after 11 September 2001. Policy Studies. 33, 283–296 (2012).
65.
Cram, L.: Whither the Commission? Reform, renewal and the issue-attention cycle. Journal of European Public Policy. 8, 770–786 (2001).
66.
Daviter, F.: Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy. 14, 654–666 (2007).
67.
Dery, D.: Agenda Setting and Problem Definition. Policy Studies. 21, 37–47 (2000).
68.
Druckman, J.N.: On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? The Journal of Politics. 63, 1041–1066 (2001).
69.
Druckman, J.N., Nelson, K.R.: Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence. American Journal of Political Science. 47, 729–745 (2003).
70.
Dunlop, C.A.: Up and down the pecking order, what matters and when in issue definition: the case of rbST in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy. 14, 39–58 (2007).
71.
Hall, C.M.: Travel Safety, Terrorism and the Media: The Significance of the Issue-Attention Cycle. Current Issues in Tourism. 5, 458–466 (2002).
72.
Hill, M.J.: The Public Policy Process. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
73.
Hogwood, B.W.: Ups and Downs: Is There an Issue-Attention Cycle in Britain? Dept. of Government, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow (1992).
74.
Majone, G.: Agenda Setting. In: The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).
75.
Rein, M.: Reframing problematic policies. In: The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
76.
Scheufele, D.A.: Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Poltical Communication. Mass Communication and Society. 3, 297–316 (2000).
77.
Rochefort, D.A., Cobb, R.W.: The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kan (1994).
78.
Baumgartner, F.R., Green-Pedersen, C., Jones, B.D.: ‘Comparative studies of policy agendas’ [in] Journal of European Public Policy. Journal of European Public Policy. 13, 959–974 (2006).
79.
Cairney, P.: Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2012).
80.
Dery, D.: ‘Agenda Setting and Problem Definition’ [in] Policy Studies. Policy Studies. 21, 37–47 (2000).
81.
Baumgartner, F.R., Jones, B.D.: Agendas and Instability in American Politics. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill (2009).
82.
Baumgartner, F.R., Mahoney, C.: ‘The Two Faces of Framing: Individual-Level Framing and Collective Issue Definition in the European Union’ [in] European Union Politics. European Union Politics. 9, 435–449 (2008).
83.
Baumgartner, F.R., Breunig, C., Green-Pedersen, C., Jones, B.D., Mortensen, P.B., Nuytemans, M., Walgrave, S.: ‘Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective’ [in] American Journal of Political Science. American Journal of Political Science. 53, 603–620 (2009).
84.
Baumgartner, F.R., Jones, B.D., Mortensen, P.B.: ‘Punctuated equilibrium theory: explaining stability and change in public policymaking’ [in] Theories of the Policy Process. In: Weible, C.M. and Sabatier, P.A. (eds.) Theories of the Policy Process. Routledge, Abingdon (2018).
85.
Crenson, M.A.: The Un-Politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non-Decisionmaking in the Cities. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore (1971).
86.
Henry, G.T., Gordon, C.S.: ‘Tracking Issue Attention: Specifying the Dynamics of the Public Agenda’ [in] The Public Opinion Quarterly. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 65, 157–177.
87.
Hill, M.J.: The Public Policy Process. Pearson Longman, Harlow (2009).
88.
Jensen, C.: ‘Focusing events, policy dictators and the dynamics of reform’ [in] Policy Studies. Policy Studies. 32, 143–158 (2011).
89.
Jones, B.D., Baumgartner, F.R.: Chapter 1: ‘How government processes information and prioritizes problems’ [in] The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. In: The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. pp. 1–27. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill (2005).
90.
Nelson, T.E., Cawson, R.A., Oxley, Z.M.: ‘Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance’ [in] The American Political Science Review. The American Political Science Review. 91, 567–583 (1997).
91.
O’Riordan, T.: ‘Stability and transformation in environmental government’ [in] Political Quarterly. The Political Quarterly. 62, 167–185 (1991).
92.
Parsons, D.W.: Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar, Aldershot (1996).
93.
Peters, B.G., Hogwood, B.W.: ‘In Search of the Issue-Attention Cycle’ [in] The Journal of Politics. The Journal of Politics. 47, 238–253 (1985).
94.
Stringer, J.K., Richardson, J.J.: ‘Managing the Political Agenda: Problem Definition and Policy Making in Britain’ [in] Parliamentary Affairs: A Journal of Comparative Politics. Parliamentary Affairs: A Journal of Comparative Politics. 33, 23–39 (1980).
95.
Sabatier, P., Weible, C.: Theories of the Policy Process. Perseus-Westview Books (2014).
96.
Wolfinger, R.E.: ‘Nondecisions and the Study of Local Politics’ [in] The American Political Science Review. The American Political Science Review. 65, 1063–1080 (1971).
97.
Yanovitzky, I.: ‘Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions: A Closer Look Into the Media-Policy Connection’ [in] Communication Research. Communication Research. 29, 422–451 (2002).
98.
Cairney, P.: Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2012).
99.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., Perl, A.: Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
100.
Davis, O.A., Dempster, M., Wildavsky, A.: A Theory of the Budgetary Process. The American Political Science Review. 60, 529–547 (1966).
101.
Dempster, M.A.H., Wildavsky, A.: On Change: Or There is No Magic Size for an Increment. Political Studies. 27, 371–389 (1979).
102.
Gregory, R.: Political rationality or incrementalism. In: The Public Policy Process. Routledge, London (2016).
103.
Ham, C., Hill, M.: The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State. Harvester Wheatsheaf, London (1993).
104.
Hogwood, B.W.: Chapter 1: Making sense of policy activity. In: From Crisis to Complacency? pp. 1–24. Oxford University Press, New York (1987).
105.
Jenkins, B.: ‘Policy analysis: models and approaches’ [in] The Public Policy Process. In: The Public Policy Process. Routledge, London (2016).
106.
Leach, S.: Chapter 1: In Defence of the Rational Model. In: Approaches in Public Policy. pp. 6–23. Allen & Unwin for the Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham, London (1982).
107.
Lindblom, C.E.: The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review. 19, 79–88 (1959).
108.
Lindblom, C.E.: Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. Public Administration Review. 39, 517–526 (1979).
109.
Mintz, A.: Applied Decision Analysis: Utilizing Poliheuristic Theory to Explain and Predict Foreign Policy and National Security Decisions. International Studies Perspectives. 6, 94–98 (2005).
110.
Parsons, D.W.: Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar, Aldershot (1996).
111.
Rothmayr Allison, C., Saint-Martin, D.: Half a century of ‘muddling’: Are we there yet? Policy and Society. 30, 1–8 (2011).
112.
Simon, H.A.: Chapter IV: Rationality in Administrative Behavior. In: Administrative Behaviour: A Study of Decision-Making Process in Administrative Organisation. pp. 61–78. Free Press; Collier-Macmillan, New York (1965).
113.
Simon, H.A.: Organizational design: man-machine systems for decision-making. In: The New Science of Management Decision. pp. 35–50. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1977).
114.
Hill, M.: The Policy Process: A Reader. Prentice Hall, Harlow (1997).
115.
Teisman, G.R.: Models For Research into Decision-Making Processes: On Phases, Streams and Decision-Making Rounds. Public Administration. 78, 937–956 (2000).
116.
Breunig, C., Koski, C.: The Tortoise or the Hare? Incrementalism, Punctuations, and Their Consequences. Policy Studies Journal. 40, 45–68 (2012).
117.
Cohen, M.D., March, J., Olsen, J.: A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly. 17, 1–25 (1972).
118.
Cyert, R.M., March, J.G.: A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Blackwell Business, Cambridge, Mass (1992).
119.
Greener, I.: The three moments of New Labour’s health policy discourse. Policy and Politics. 32, 303–316 (2004).
120.
Kingdon, J.W.: Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Pearson, Harlow, Essex (2014).
121.
March, J.G., Olsen, J.P.: Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Universitetsforlaget, Bergen (1976).
122.
Mucciaroni, G.: The Garbage Can Model & the Study of Policy Making: A Critique. Polity. 24, 459–482 (1992).
123.
Paton, C.: Garbage-can policy-making meets neo-liberal ideology: twenty five years of redundant reform of the English National Health Service. Social Policy & Administration. 48, 319–342 (2014).
124.
Tiernan, A., Burke, T.: A Load of Old Garbage: Applying Garbage-Can Theory to Contemporary Housing Policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 61, 86–97 (2002).
125.
Cairney, P.: Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2012).
126.
Dunlop, C.: How Policy Elites Learn and Why Policy Legacies Matter: A Process Analysis of Gay Marriage Legalization in England and Wales, http://readinglists.exeter.ac.uk/Resource List Odd Links/POL2060/POL2060_40.pdf, (2014).
127.
Ferris, J.M., Tang, S.-Y.: The New Institutionalism and Public Administration: An Overview. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART. 3, 4–10 (1993).
128.
Hall, P.A., Taylor, R.C.R.: Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies. 44, 936–957 (1996).
129.
Hill, M.: Chapter 7: The Policy Process as an Organisational Process. In: The Policy Process in the Modern State. pp. 153–176. Prentice Hall, London (1997).
130.
Hill, M.J.: The Public Policy Process. Routledge, London (2016).
131.
Janis, I.L.: Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1982).
132.
Janis, I.L., Mann, L.: Decision-Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. The Free Press, London (1977).
133.
John, P.: Analysing Public Policy. Routledge, London (2012).
134.
Lowndes, V.: Chapter 4: Institutionalism. In: Theory and Methods in Political Science. pp. 90–108. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2002).
135.
March, J.G., Olsen, J.P.: The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. The American Political Science Review. 78, 734–749 (1984).
136.
March, J.G., Olsen, J.P.: Chapter 1: Elaborating the ‘New Institutionalism’. In: The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006).
137.
North, D.C.: Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990).
138.
Parsons, D.W.: Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar, Aldershot (1996).
139.
Peters, B.G.: Political institutions: old and new. In: A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996).
140.
Rhodes, R.A.W.: Chapter 4: The institutional approach. In: Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. pp. 63–84. Open University Press, Buckingham (1997).
141.
Rothstein, B.: Political institutions: an overview. In: A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998).
142.
Schmidt, V.A.: Give peace a chance: reconciling four (not three) ‘New Institutionalisms’, http://readinglists.exeter.ac.uk/Resource List Odd Links/POL1044/POL1044_01.pdf, (2012).
143.
Selznick, P.: Institutionalism ‘Old’ and ‘New’. Administrative Science Quarterly. 41, 270–277 (1996).
144.
Cairney, P.: Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2012).
145.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., Perl, A.: Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
146.
Asare, B.E., Studlar, D.T.: Lesson-drawing and public policy: secondhand smoking restrictions in Scotland and England. Policy Studies. 30, 365–382 (2009).
147.
Atikcan, E.Ö.: Diffusion in Referendum Campaigns: The Case of EU Constitutional Referendums. Journal of European Integration. 37, 451–470 (2015).
148.
Bennett, C.J.: Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross-National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability. Governance. 10, 213–233 (1997).
149.
Benson, D., Jordan, A.: Policy Transfer Research: Still Evolving, Not Yet Through? Political Studies Review. 10, 333–338 (2012).
150.
Carroll, P., Common, R.: Policy Transfer and Learning in Public Policy and Management: International Contexts, Content and Development. Routledge, London (2013).
151.
Clarke, J., Bainton, D., Lendvai, N., Stubbs, P.: Making Policy Move: Towards a Politics of Translation and Assemblage. Policy Press, Bristol (2015).
152.
Carroll, P., Common, R.: Policy Transfer and Learning in Public Policy and Management: International Contexts, Content and Development. Routledge, London (2013).
153.
Dolowitz, D., Marsh, D.: Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature. Political Studies. 44, 343–357 (1996).
154.
Dolowitz, D.P., Marsh, D.: Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance. 13, 5–23 (2000).
155.
Dunlop, C.A.: Policy transfer as learning: capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies. 30, 289–311 (2009).
156.
Dunlop, C.A.: Principal-Agent Modelling and Learning: The European Commission, Experts and Agricultural Hormone Growth Promoters. Public Policy and Administration. 30, 291–313 (2009).
157.
Dunlop, C.A., Radaelli, C.M.: Systematising Policy Learning: From Monolith to Dimensions. Political Studies. 61, 599–619 (2013).
158.
Evans, M.: Policy Transfer in Critical Perspective. Policy Studies. 30, 243–268 (2009).
159.
Freeman, R.: Learning in public policy. In: The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
160.
James, O., Lodge, M.: The Limitations of ‘Policy Transfer’ and ‘Lesson Drawing’ for Public Policy Research. Political Studies Review. 1, 179–193 (2003).
161.
Manwaring, R.: The Big Society in Australia: A Case of ‘Non’-Policy Transfer? Australian Journal of Public Administration. 75, 191–201 (2016).
162.
Moss, P.: Sure start. Journal of Education Policy. 19, 631–634 (2004).
163.
Peck, J.: Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography. 35, 773–797 (2011).
164.
Peck, J., Theodore, N.: Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2015).
165.
Rose, R.: Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space. Chatham House Publishers, Chatham, N.J (1993).
166.
Shawki, N.: Transnationalism and Diffusion: A Study of the Food Sovereignty Movements in the UK and Canada. Globalizations. 12, 758–773 (2015).
167.
Weible, C.M., Sabatier, P.A. eds: Theories of the Policy Process. Routledge, Abingdon (2018).
168.
Stone, D.: Learning Lessons and Transferring Policy across Time, Space and Disciplines. Politics. 19, 51–59 (1999).
169.
Stone, D.: Global Public Policy, Transnational Policy Communities, and their Networks. Policy Studies Journal. 36, 19–38 (2008).
170.
Stone, D.: Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies. 33, 483–499 (2012).
171.
Wolman, H.: Understanding Cross National Policy Transfers: The Case of Britain and the US. Governance. 5, 27–45 (1992).
172.
Arentsen, M.J., Bressers, H.Th.A., O’Toole, L.J.: Institutional and Policy Responses to Uncertainty in Environmental Policy: A Comparison of Dutch and U.S. Styles. Policy Studies Journal. 28, 597–611 (2000).
173.
Baggot, R.: From Confrontation to Consultation? Pressure Group Relations From Thatcher to Major. Parliamentary Affairs. 48, 484–502 (1995).
174.
Cairney, P.: The New British Policy Style: From a British to a Scottish Political Tradition? Political Studies Review. 9, 208–220 (2011).
175.
Freeman, G.P.: National Styles and Policy Sectors: Explaining Structured Variation. Journal of Public Policy. 5, 467–496 (1985).
176.
Hay, C.: Globalization and public policy. In: The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
177.
Hayward, J.: National Aptitudes for Planning in Britain, France, and Italy. Government and Opposition. 9, 397–410 (1974).
178.
Heidenheimer, A.J., Heclo, H., Adams, C.T.: Comparative Public Policy: The Politics of Social Choice in Europe and America. Macmillan, London (1983).
179.
Hennessy, P.: The Blair Style of Government: An Historical Perspective and an Interim Audit. Government and Opposition. 33, 3–20 (1998).
180.
Hennessy, P.: The Blair Government in Historical Perspective: An Analysis of the Power Relationships within New Labour. History Today. 52, 21–25 (2002).
181.
Howlett, M.: Administrative styles and the Iimits of administrative reform: A neo-institutional analysis of administrative cuIture. Canadian Public Administration/Administration Publique du Canada. 46, 471–494 (2003).
182.
Jordan, A.G., Richardson, J.J.: Chapter 4: The British Policy Style or the Logic of Negotiation. In: Policy Styles in Western Europe. pp. 80–110. Allen & Unwin, London (1982).
183.
Knill, C.: European Policies: The Impact of National Administrative Traditions. Journal of Public Policy. 18, 1–28 (1998).
184.
Maassen, P., Moen, E., Stensaker, B.: Reforming higher education in the Netherlands and Norway: the role of the state and national modes of governance. Policy Studies. 32, 479–495 (2011).
185.
Mamudu, H., Cairney, P., Studlar, D.: 'Global Public Policy’: Does the New Venue for Transnational Tobacco Control Challenge the Old Way of Doing Things? Public Administration. (2015).
186.
Maioni, A.: Parting at the Crossroads: The Development of Health Insurance in Canada and the United States, 1940-1965. Comparative Politics. 29, 411–431 (1997).
187.
Reinicke, W.H.: Global Public Policy. Foreign Affairs. 76, 127–138 (1997).
188.
Steinmo, S.: Political Institutions and Tax Policy in the United States, Sweden, and Britain. World Politics. 41, 500–535 (1989).
189.
Stone, D.: Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy. 11, 545–566 (2004).
190.
Geva-May, I.: Riding the Wave of Opportunity: Termination in Public Policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 14, 309–333 (2004).
191.
Howlett, M.: Pages 191-192: The Outcomes of Policy Evaluation: Policy Feedback and Policy Termination. In: Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. pp. 191–192. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
192.
Hogwood, B.W., Peters, B.G.: Policy Dynamics. Wheatsheaf Books, Brighton (1983).
193.
Lindblom, C.E.: The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review. 19, 79–88 (1959).
194.
Patashnik, E.M.: Ideas, Inheritances, and the Dynamics of Budgetary Change. Governance. 12, 147–174 (1999).
195.
Pierson, P.: Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. The American Political Science Review. 94, 251–267 (2000).
196.
Rose, R.: Do Parties Make a Difference? Macmillan, London (1984).
197.
Rose, R., Davies, P.L.: Inheritance in Public Policy: Change Without Choice in Britain. Yale University Press, New Haven (1994).
198.
Bardach, E.: Policy Termination as a Political Process. Policy Sciences. 7, 123–131 (1976).
199.
Bothun, D., Comer, J.C.: The Politics of Termination: Concepts and Process. Policy Studies Journal. 7, 540–553 (1979).
200.
Brewer, G.D.: Termination: Hard Choices, Harder Questions. Public Administration Review. 38, 338–344 (1978).
201.
Daniels, M.R.: Organizational Termination and Policy Continuation: Closing the Oklahoma Public Training Schools. Policy Sciences. 28, 301–316 (1995).
202.
de Leon, P.: Public Policy Termination: An End and a Beginning. Policy Analysis. 4, 369–392 (1978).
203.
Dommett, K., Skelcher, C.: Opening the Black Box of Administrative Reform: A Strategic-Relational Analysis. International Public Management Journal. 17, 540–563 (2014).
204.
Frantz, J.E.: Reviving and Revising a Termination Model. Policy Sciences. 25, 175–189 (1992).
205.
Frantz, J.E.: Political Resources for Policy Terminators. Policy Studies Journal. 30, 11–28 (2002).
206.
Graddy, E.A., Ye, K.: When Do We ‘Just Say No’? Policy Termination Decisions in Local Hospital Services. Policy Studies Journal. 36, 219–242 (2008).
207.
Jordan, A., Bauer, M.W., Green-Pedersen, C.: Policy dismantling. Journal of European Public Policy. 20, 795–805 (2013).
208.
Jordana, J.: Multiple Crises and Policy Dismantling in Spain: Political Strategies and Distributive Implications. Political Studies Review. 12, 224–238 (2014).
209.
O’Leary, C.: Agency Termination in the UK: What Explains the ‘Bonfire of the Quangos’? West European Politics. 38, 1327–1344 (2015).
210.
Parsons, W.D.: Pages 570-579. In: Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. pp. 570–579. Edward Elgar, Aldershot (1996).
211.
Sato, H.: Abolition of Leprosy Isolation Policy in Japan. Policy Termination through Leadership. Policy Studies Journal. 30, 29–46 (2002).
212.
Wise, C.R., O’Leary, R.: Breaking up is Hard to Do: The Dissolution of Judicial Supervision of Public Services. Public Administration Review. 63, 177–191 (2003).
213.
Hill, M.J., Hupe, P.L.: Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and Practice. Sage, London (2002).
214.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., Perl, A.: Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
215.
Anderson, J.E.: Public Policy-Making. Nelson, London (1975).
216.
Birrell, D.: Devolution and quangos in the United Kingdom: the implementation of principles and policies for rationalisation and democratisation. Policy Studies. 29, 35–49 (2008).
217.
Browne, A., Wildavsky, A.: Chapter 10: Implementation as Mutual Adjustment. In: Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland. pp. 206–231. University of California Press, Berkeley (1984).
218.
Burch, M., Wood, B.: Chapter 7: The Products of Government: Carrying out Intentions. In: Public Policy in Britain. pp. 167–192. Robertson, Oxford (1983).
219.
Forbes, T., Evans, D., Scott, N.: Implementing health and social care policy – England and Scotland compared. Policy Studies. 31, 591–611 (2010).
220.
Fyfe, G., Johnston Miller, K., McTavish, D.: 'Muddling through’ in a devolved polity: implementation of equal opportunities policy in Scotland. Policy Studies. 30, 203–219 (2009).
221.
Hill, M.: Implementation Theory: Yesterday’s Issue? Policy and Politics. 25, 375–385 (1997).
222.
Hill, M.J.: The Public Policy Process. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
223.
Hogwood, B.W., Gunn, L.A.: Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1984).
224.
Howlett, M.: Chapter 7: Policy Implementation. In: Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. pp. 160–177. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
225.
Hupe, P.L.: The Thesis of Incongruent Implementation: Revisiting Pressman and Wildavsky. Public Policy and Administration. 26, 63–80 (2011).
226.
Hupe, P.: What happens on the ground: Persistent issues in implementation research. Public Policy and Administration. 29, 164–182 (2014).
227.
Hupe, P., Hill, M., Nangia, M.: Studying implementation beyond deficit analysis: The top-down view reconsidered. Public Policy and Administration. 29, 145–163 (2014).
228.
James, S.: Chapter 5: Implementation and policy review. In: British Government: A Reader in Policy Making. pp. 152–170. Routledge, London (1997).
229.
Parsons, D.W.: Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar, Aldershot (1996).
230.
Riccucci, N.M.: Implementing welfare reform in Michigan: The role of street-level bureaucrats. International Journal of Public Administration. 25, 901–921 (2002).
231.
Allen, C.: ‘They just don’t live and breathe the policy like we do…’: Policy intentions and practice dilemmas in modern social policy and implementation networks. Policy Studies. 22, 149–166 (2001).
232.
Anderson, J.E.: Public Policy-Making. Nelson, London (1975).
233.
Beletsky, L., Macalino, G.E., Burris, S.: Attitudes of police officers towards syringe access, occupational needle-sticks, and drug use: A qualitative study of one city police department in the United States. International Journal of Drug Policy. 16, 267–274 (2005).
234.
Dunér, A., Nordström, M.: The discretion and power of street-level bureaucrats: an example from Swedish municipal eldercare. European Journal of Social Work. 9, 425–444 (2006).
235.
Gunn, L.A.: Why is implementation so difficult? Management Services in Government. 33, 169–176 (1978).
236.
Hill, M.: The Policy Process in the Modern State. Prentice Hall, London (1997).
237.
Hogwood, B.W.: From Crisis to Complacency?: Shaping Public Policy in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987).
238.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., Perl, A.: Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
239.
James, S.: Chapter 5: Implementation and policy review. In: British Government: A Reader in Policy Making. pp. 152–169. Routledge, London (1997).
240.
Jackson, P.M.: Chapter 2: Economic policy. In: Implementing Thatcherite Policies: Audit of an Era. pp. 11–31. Open University Press, Buckingham (1992).
241.
May, P.J.: Implementation failures revisited: Policy regime perspectives. Public Policy and Administration. 30, 277–299 (2015).
242.
Parsons, D.W.: Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar, Aldershot (1996).
243.
Davies, H., Nutley, S., Walter, I.: Academic Advice to Practitioners? The Role and Use of Research-Based Evidence. Public Money and Management. 27, 232–235 (2007).
244.
Dunlop, C.A.: The temporal dimension of knowledge and the limits of policy appraisal: biofuels policy in the UK. Policy Sciences. 43, 343–363 (2009).
245.
Nutley, S.M., Homel, P.: Delivering evidence-based practice: lessons from the implementation of the UK Crime Reduction Programme. Evidence and Policy. 2, 5–26 (2008).
246.
Radaelli, C.M.: The role of knowledge in the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy. 2, 159–183 (1995).
247.
Young, K., Ashby, D., Boaz, A., Grayson, L.: Social science and the evidence-based policy movement. Social Policy and Society. 1, (2002).
248.
Bovens, M., ’T Hart, P., Kuipers, S.: The politics of policy evaluation. In: The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
249.
Burch, M., Wood, B.: Public Policy in Britain. Robertson, Oxford (1983).
250.
Dunlop, C., Fritsch, O., Radaelli, C.: The appraisal of policy appraisal – learning about impact assessment. (2014).
251.
Hill, M.J.: The Public Policy Process. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
252.
Hogwood, B.W.: From Crisis to Complacency?: Shaping Public Policy in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987).
253.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., Perl, A.: Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
254.
National Audit Office: Measuring Performance in Government Departments HC 301 Parliamentary Session 2000-01.
255.
Owens, S., Rayner, T., Bina, O.: New agendas for appraisal: reflections on theory, practice, and research. Environment and Planning A. 36, 1943–1959 (2004).
256.
Palumbo, D.J., Nachmias, D.: The preconditions for successful evaluation: is there an ideal paradigm? Policy Sciences. 16, 67–79 (1983).
257.
Parsons, D.W.: Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar, Aldershot (1996).
258.
Pollitt, C.: Occasional excursions: a brief history of policy evaluation in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs: A Journal of Comparative Politics. 46, 353–362 (1993).
259.
Radin, B.: Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C. (2000).
260.
Sanderson, I.: Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration. 80, 1–22 (2002).
261.
Turnpenny, J., Radaelli, C.M., Jordan, A., Jacob, K.: The policy and politics of policy appraisal: emerging trends and new directions. Journal of European Public Policy. 16, 640–653 (2009).
262.
Jordan, A., Turnpenny, J.: The Tools of Policy Formulation. Edward Elgar Publishing (2015).
263.
Walker, R.: Learning if policy will work: the case of New Deal for disabled people. Policy Studies. 21, 313–332 (2000).
264.
Weiss, C.H.: How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway? Evaluation Review. 21, 501–524 (1997).
265.
Weiss, C.H.: Evaluation Research: Methods for Assessing Program Effectiveness. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1972).
266.
Weiss, C.H.: The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review. 39, 426–431 (1979).
267.
Weiss, C.H.: Where politics and evaluation research meet. Evaluation Practice. 14, 93–106 (1993).
268.
Boin, A., McConnell, A., ’t Hart, P.: Governing After Crisis: The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008).
269.
Marsh, D., McConnell, A.: Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public Administration. 88, 564–583 (2010).
270.
Moran, M.: Not steering but drowning: policy catastrophes and the regulatory state. The Political Quarterly. 72, 414–427 (2001).
