1
Politics and International Relations - LibGuides at University of Exeter. http://libguides.exeter.ac.uk/PoliticsHomePage
2
Cairney P. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004572109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
3
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009.
4
Araral E, Fritzen S, Howlett M, et al. Routledge Handbook of Public Policy. 2012. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001810299707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
5
Dorey P. Policy Making in Britain: An Introduction. London: : SAGE 2005. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991000541989707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
6
Dunn WN. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. 5th ed. Boston: : Pearson 2012. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781317344841
7
Moran M, Rein M, Goodin RE. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/search?btog=book&isQuickSearch=true&pageSize=10&q=9780199548453&sort=relevance
8
Knill C, Tosun J. Public Policy: A New Introduction. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012.
9
Parsons DW. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: : Edward Elgar 1996.
10
Web of Science. https://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&SID=E3yLlsZ8g1WokXQ7aqs&preferencesSaved=
11
Cairney P. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004572109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
12
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009.
13
Ham C, Hill M. Chapter 1: Policy and Policy Analysis. In: The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State. New York: : Harvester Wheatsheaf 1993. 1–21.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3552f4c5-b472-e611-80c6-005056af4099
14
Hogwood BW. Chapter 1: Making Sense of Policy Activity. In: From Crisis to Complacency?: Shaping Public Policy in Britain. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1987. 1–24.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=77c84a05-b972-e611-80c6-005056af4099
15
Hogwood BW. Chapter 1: A Framework for Analysis. In: Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1984. 3–11.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=98b492fe-ba72-e611-80c6-005056af4099
16
Hill M. The Policy Process: A Reader. 2nd ed. Harlow: : Prentice Hall 1997. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003441239707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
17
Mark V. Nadel. The Hidden Dimension of Public Policy: Private Governments and the Policy- Making Process. The Journal of Politics 1975;37:2–34.
18
Nadel MV. Rejoinder to Martin Sorin’s Critique. The Journal of Politics 1976;38:164–5.
19
Richards D, Smith MJ. Chapter 1: Introduction: public policy in a changing world. In: Governance and Public Policy in the UK. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2002. 1–12.
20
Sabatier PA. Chapter 1: The need for better theories. In: Theories of the policy process. Boulder, Colo: : Perseus Running [distributor] 2007. 3–17.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0562642f-3175-e611-80c6-005056af4099
21
Sorin M. The boundary between public and private policy-making: a reply to Mark V. Nadel. The Journal of Politics 1976;38:159–63.
22
Weimer DL, Vining AR. Chapter 2: What is policy analysis? In: Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: : Prentice Hall 1999. 27–42.
23
Cairney P. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004572109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
24
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009.
25
Dorey P. Organized interests and policy networks. In: Policy Making in Britain: An Introduction. London: : SAGE 2005. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?docID=354915&ppg=139
26
Dowding K. Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach. Political Studies 1995;43:136–58.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=9504246414&site=eds-live&scope=site
27
Hay C, Richards D. The Tangled Webs of Westminster and Whitehall: The Discourse, Strategy and Practice of Networking Within the British Core Executive. Public Administration 2000;78:1–28.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=3024263&site=eds-live&scope=site
28
Heclo H. Chapter 3: Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment. In: The New American Political System. Washington: : American Institute 1978. 87–124.
29
Hill MJ. The Public Policy Process. 6th ed. Harlow: : Pearson 2013. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003121949707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
30
Hindmoor A. Explaining Networks through Mechanisms: Vaccination, Priming and the 2001 Foot and Mouth Disease Crisis. Political Studies 2009;57:75–94.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=36162180&site=eds-live&scope=site
31
Ingold K. Network Structures within Policy Processes: Coalitions, Power, and Brokerage in Swiss Climate Policy. Policy Studies Journal 2011;39:435–59.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=63478364&site=eds-live&scope=site
32
Leifeld P, Schneider V. Information Exchange in Policy Networks. American Journal of Political Science 2012;56:731–44.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.23316017&site=eds-live&scope=site
33
Marsh D, Smith M. Understanding Policy Networks: Towards a Dialectical Approach. Political Studies 2000;48:4–21.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=2983772&site=eds-live&scope=site
34
Marsh D, Toke D, Belfrage C, et al. Policy networks and the distinction between insider and outsider groups: the case of the Countryside Alliance. Public Administration 2009;87:621–38.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=43460549&site=eds-live&scope=site
35
Page EC. The Insider/Outsider Distinction: An Empirical Investigation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 1999;1:205–14.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=4519055&site=eds-live&scope=site
36
Weible CM, Sabatier (eds) PA. Theories of the Policy Process. Fourth edition. Abingdon: : Routledge 2018. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991008241689707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
37
Sandström A, Carlsson L. The Performance of Policy Networks: The Relation between Network Structure and Network Performance. Policy Studies Journal 2008;36:497–524.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=36108715&site=eds-live&scope=site
38
Smith MJ. From policy community to issue network: Salmonella in eggs and the new politics of food. Public Administration 1991;69:235–55.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=4548959&site=eds-live&scope=site
39
Williams N. Modernising Government: Policy Networks, Competition and the Quest for Efficiency. The Political Quarterly 2000;71:412–21.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=4336104&site=eds-live&scope=site
40
Hann A. Sharpening up Sabatier: Belief Systems and Public Policy. Politics 1995;15:19–26.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edo&AN=ejs42483476&site=eds-live&scope=site
41
Litfin KT. Advocacy Coalitions Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Globalization and Canadian Climate Change Policy. Policy Studies Journal 2000;28:236–52.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=3357211&site=eds-live&scope=site
42
Sabatier PA. Chapter 2: Policy Change over a Decade or More. In: Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, Colo: : Westview Press 1993. 13–39.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8679a7ed-ce72-e611-80c6-005056af4099
43
Sabatier P, Weible C. Theories of the Policy Process. Perseus-Westview Books 2014. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991008373719707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
44
Sato H. The Advocacy Coalition Framework and the Policy Process Analysis: The Case of Smoking Control in Japan. Policy Studies Journal 1999;27:28–44.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000080383600002&site=eds-live&scope=site
45
Weible CM, Sabatier PA, McQueen K. Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Policy Studies Journal 2009;37:121–40.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=36606282&site=eds-live&scope=site
46
Adler E, Haas PM. Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program. International Organization 1992;46.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.2706960&site=eds-live&scope=site
47
Dunlop C. Epistemic Communities: A Reply to Toke. Politics 2000;20:137–44.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=3727952&site=eds-live&scope=site
48
Dunlop CA. Policy transfer as learning: capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies 2009;30:289–311.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=43211253&site=eds-live&scope=site
49
Araral E, Fritzen S, Howlett M, et al. Routledge Handbook of Public Policy. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001810299707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
50
Haas PM. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 1992;46:1–35.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.2706951&site=eds-live&scope=site
51
Zito AR. Epistemic communities, collective entrepreneurship and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy 2001;8:585–603.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000170358600005&site=eds-live&scope=site
52
Collins M. The Beatles’ Politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2014;16:291–309.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswah&AN=000333746700005&site=eds-live&scope=site
53
Couldry N, Markham T. Celebrity culture and public connection: Bridge or chasm? International Journal of Cultural Studies 2007;10:403–21.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=34372387&site=eds-live&scope=site
54
Farrell N. Celebrity Politics: Bono, Product (RED) and the Legitimising of Philanthrocapitalism. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2012;14:392–406.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000305888200005&site=eds-live&scope=site
55
Street J. Do Celebrity Politics and Celebrity Politicians Matter? British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2012;14:346–56.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000305888200002&site=eds-live&scope=site
56
Wheeler M. Celebrity Politics. Cambridge: : Polity 2013.
57
Boin A, ’t Hart P, McConnell A. Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public Policy 2009;16:81–106.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000261413900005&site=eds-live&scope=site
58
Downs A. Up and Down with Ecology-the Issue-Attention Cycle. The Public Interest 1972;28:65–80.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/pao/docview/1298108041/349C07E4C30F4ABEPQ/1?accountid=10792
59
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009.
60
Bachrach P, Baratz MS. Two Faces of Power. The American Political Science Review 1962;56:947–52.
61
Bell R, Edwards DV, Wagner RH. Political Power: A Reader in Theory and Research. New York: : Free Press 1969.
62
Bessant J. From ‘harm minimization’ to ‘zero tolerance’ drugs policy in Australia: how the Howard government changed its mind. Policy Studies 2008;29:197–214.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=31937596&site=eds-live&scope=site
63
Cobb MD, Kuklinski JH. Changing Minds: Political Arguments and Political Persuasion. American Journal of Political Science 1997;41:88–121.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.2307.2111710&site=eds-live&scope=site
64
Frederking LC. A comparative study of framing immigration policy after 11 September 2001. Policy Studies 2012;33:283–96.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=77508810&site=eds-live&scope=site
65
Cram L. Whither the Commission? Reform, renewal and the issue-attention cycle. Journal of European Public Policy 2001;8:770–86.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000171648300005&site=eds-live&scope=site
66
Daviter F. Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 2007;14:654–66.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbl&AN=RN209537034&site=eds-live&scope=site
67
Dery D. Agenda Setting and Problem Definition. Policy Studies 2000;21:37–47.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=3788531&site=eds-live&scope=site
68
Druckman JN. On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? The Journal of Politics 2001;63:1041–66.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.2691806&site=eds-live&scope=site
69
Druckman JN, Nelson KR. Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence. American Journal of Political Science 2003;47:729–45.
70
Dunlop CA. Up and down the pecking order, what matters and when in issue definition: the case of rbST in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy 2007;14:39–58.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000244001800003&site=eds-live&scope=site
71
Hall CM. Travel Safety, Terrorism and the Media: The Significance of the Issue-Attention Cycle. Current Issues in Tourism 2002;5:458–66.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edo&AN=ejs18848274&site=eds-live&scope=site
72
Hill MJ. The Public Policy Process. 6th ed. Harlow: : Pearson 2013. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780273782865
73
Hogwood BW. Ups and Downs: Is There an Issue-Attention Cycle in Britain? Glasgow: : Dept. of Government, University of Strathclyde 1992.
74
Majone G. Agenda Setting. In: The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008.
75
Rein M. Reframing problematic policies. In: The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199548453-e-018
76
Scheufele DA. Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Poltical Communication. Mass Communication and Society 2000;3:297–316.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=3455306&site=eds-live&scope=site
77
Rochefort DA, Cobb RW. The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda. Lawrence, Kan: : University Press of Kansas 1994.
78
Baumgartner FR, Green-Pedersen C, Jones BD. ‘Comparative studies of policy agendas’ [in] Journal of European Public Policy. Journal of European Public Policy 2006;13:959–74.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13501760600923805#aHR0cDovLzAtd3d3LnRhbmRmb25saW5lLmNvbS5saWIuZXhldGVyLmFjLnVrL2RvaS9wZGYvMTAuMTA4MC8xMzUwMTc2MDYwMDkyMzgwNUBAQDA=
79
Cairney P. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780230356993
80
Dery D. ‘Agenda Setting and Problem Definition’ [in] Policy Studies. Policy Studies 2000;21:37–47.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/014428700114008#aHR0cDovLzAtd3d3LnRhbmRmb25saW5lLmNvbS5saWIuZXhldGVyLmFjLnVrL2RvaS9wZGYvMTAuMTA4MC8wMTQ0Mjg3MDAxMTQwMDhAQEAw
81
Baumgartner FR, Jones BD. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. 2nd ed. Chicago, Ill: : The University of Chicago Press 2009.
82
Baumgartner FR, Mahoney C. ‘The Two Faces of Framing: Individual-Level Framing and Collective Issue Definition in the European Union’ [in] European Union Politics. European Union Politics 2008;9:435–49.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://eup.sagepub.com/content/9/3/435.full.pdf+html
83
Baumgartner FR, Breunig C, Green-Pedersen C, et al. ‘Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective’ [in] American Journal of Political Science. American Journal of Political Science 2009;53:603–20.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/25548140?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
84
Baumgartner FR, Jones BD, Mortensen PB. ‘Punctuated equilibrium theory: explaining stability and change in public policymaking’ [in] Theories of the Policy Process. In: Weible CM, Sabatier PA, eds. Theories of the Policy Process. Abingdon: : Routledge 2018. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780429494284
85
Crenson MA. The Un-Politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non-Decisionmaking in the Cities. Baltimore: : Johns Hopkins Press 1971.
86
Henry GT, Gordon CS. ‘Tracking Issue Attention: Specifying the Dynamics of the Public Agenda’ [in] The Public Opinion Quarterly. The Public Opinion Quarterly;65:157–77.
87
Hill MJ. The Public Policy Process. 5th ed. Harlow: : Pearson Longman 2009.
88
Jensen C. ‘Focusing events, policy dictators and the dynamics of reform’ [in] Policy Studies. Policy Studies 2011;32:143–58.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01442872.2010.541772
89
Jones BD, Baumgartner FR. Chapter 1: ‘How government processes information and prioritizes problems’ [in] The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. In: The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago, Ill: : University of Chicago Press 2005. 1–27.
90
Nelson TE, Cawson RA, Oxley ZM. ‘Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance’ [in] The American Political Science Review. The American Political Science Review 1997;91:567–83.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.2952075&site=eds-live&scope=site
91
O’Riordan T. ‘Stability and transformation in environmental government’ [in] Political Quarterly. The Political Quarterly 1991;62:167–85.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1991.tb00851.x
92
Parsons DW. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: : Edward Elgar 1996.
93
Peters BG, Hogwood BW. ‘In Search of the Issue-Attention Cycle’ [in] The Journal of Politics. The Journal of Politics 1985;47:238–53.
94
Stringer JK, Richardson JJ. ‘Managing the Political Agenda: Problem Definition and Policy Making in Britain’ [in] Parliamentary Affairs: A Journal of Comparative Politics. Parliamentary Affairs: A Journal of Comparative Politics 1980;33:23–39.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://academic.oup.com/pa/article/33/1/23/1456825?searchresult=1
95
Sabatier P, Weible C. Theories of the Policy Process. Perseus-Westview Books 2014. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780813349275
96
Wolfinger RE. ‘Nondecisions and the Study of Local Politics’ [in] The American Political Science Review. The American Political Science Review 1971;65:1063–80.
97
Yanovitzky I. ‘Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions: A Closer Look Into the Media-Policy Connection’ [in] Communication Research. Communication Research 2002;29:422–51.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000176915400003&site=eds-live&scope=site
98
Cairney P. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004572109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
99
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009.
100
Davis OA, Dempster M, Wildavsky A. A Theory of the Budgetary Process. The American Political Science Review 1966;60:529–47.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.2307.1952969&site=eds-live&scope=site
101
Dempster MAH, Wildavsky A. On Change: Or There is No Magic Size for an Increment. Political Studies 1979;27:371–89.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=14348734&site=eds-live&scope=site
102
Gregory R. Political rationality or incrementalism. In: The Public Policy Process. London: : Routledge 2016. https://shibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&target=https%3A%2F%2Fshibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net%2Fshib%3Fdest%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.vlebooks.com%252FSHIBBOLETH%253Fdest%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.vlebooks.com%25252Fvleweb%25252Fproduct%25252Fopenreader%25253Fid%25253DExeter%252526isbn%25253D9781317438076
103
Ham C, Hill M. The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State. 2nd ed. London: : Harvester Wheatsheaf 1993.
104
Hogwood BW. Chapter 1: Making sense of policy activity. In: From Crisis to Complacency? New York: : Oxford University Press 1987. 1–24.
105
Jenkins B. ‘Policy analysis: models and approaches’ [in] The Public Policy Process. In: The Public Policy Process. London: : Routledge 2016. https://shibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&target=https%3A%2F%2Fshibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net%2Fshib%3Fdest%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.vlebooks.com%252FSHIBBOLETH%253Fdest%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.vlebooks.com%25252Fvleweb%25252Fproduct%25252Fopenreader%25253Fid%25253DExeter%252526isbn%25253D9781317438076
106
Leach S. Chapter 1: In Defence of the Rational Model. In: Approaches in Public Policy. London: : Allen & Unwin for the Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham 1982. 6–23.
107
Lindblom CE. The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review 1959;19:79–88.
108
Lindblom CE. Still Muddling, Not Yet Through. Public Administration Review 1979;39:517–26.
109
Mintz A. Applied Decision Analysis: Utilizing Poliheuristic Theory to Explain and Predict Foreign Policy and National Security Decisions. International Studies Perspectives 2005;6:94–8.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.44218354&site=eds-live&scope=site
110
Parsons DW. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: : Edward Elgar 1996.
111
Rothmayr Allison C, Saint-Martin D. Half a century of ‘muddling’: Are we there yet? Policy and Society 2011;30:1–8.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselp&AN=S1449403510000512&site=eds-live&scope=site
112
Simon HA. Chapter IV: Rationality in Administrative Behavior. In: Administrative Behaviour: A Study of Decision-Making Process in Administrative Organisation. New York: : Free Press; Collier-Macmillan 1965. 61–78.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ceb858dc-b276-e611-80c6-005056af4099
113
Simon HA. Organizational design: man-machine systems for decision-making. In: The New Science of Management Decision. Englewood Cliffs: : Prentice-Hall 1977. 35–50.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d01be381-e875-e611-80c6-005056af4099
114
Hill M. The Policy Process: A Reader. 2nd ed. Harlow: : Prentice Hall 1997. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003441239707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
115
Teisman GR. Models For Research into Decision-Making Processes: On Phases, Streams and Decision-Making Rounds. Public Administration 2000;78:937–56.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=4673765&site=eds-live&scope=site
116
Breunig C, Koski C. The Tortoise or the Hare? Incrementalism, Punctuations, and Their Consequences. Policy Studies Journal 2012;40:45–68.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ecn&AN=1298119&site=eds-live&scope=site
117
Cohen MD, March J, Olsen J. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 1972;17:1–25.
118
Cyert RM, March JG. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass: : Blackwell Business 1992.
119
Greener I. The three moments of New Labour’s health policy discourse. Policy and Politics 2004;32:303–16.
120
Kingdon JW. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Second edition. Harlow, Essex: : Pearson 2014. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001253609707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
121
March JG, Olsen JP. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: : Universitetsforlaget 1976.
122
Mucciaroni G. The Garbage Can Model & the Study of Policy Making: A Critique. Polity 1992;24:459–82.
123
Paton C. Garbage-can policy-making meets neo-liberal ideology: twenty five years of redundant reform of the English National Health Service. Social Policy & Administration 2014;48:319–42.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=95771823&site=eds-live&scope=site
124
Tiernan A, Burke T. A Load of Old Garbage: Applying Garbage-Can Theory to Contemporary Housing Policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration 2002;61:86–97.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=7164276&site=eds-live&scope=site
125
Cairney P. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004572109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
126
Dunlop C. How Policy Elites Learn and Why Policy Legacies Matter: A Process Analysis of Gay Marriage Legalization in England and Wales. 2014.http://readinglists.exeter.ac.uk/Resource List Odd Links/POL2060/POL2060_40.pdf
127
Ferris JM, Tang S-Y. The New Institutionalism and Public Administration: An Overview. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART 1993;3:4–10.
128
Hall PA, Taylor RCR. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 1996;44:936–57.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=9705162186&site=eds-live&scope=site
129
Hill M. Chapter 7: The Policy Process as an Organisational Process. In: The Policy Process in the Modern State. London: : Prentice Hall 1997. 153–76.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=44a9acd0-413d-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
130
Hill MJ. The Public Policy Process. Seventh edition. London: : Routledge 2016. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004264219707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
131
Janis IL. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. 2nd ed. Boston: : Houghton Mifflin 1982.
132
Janis IL, Mann L. Decision-Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. London: : The Free Press 1977.
133
John P. Analysing Public Policy. 2nd ed. London: : Routledge 2012. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001264389707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
134
Lowndes V. Chapter 4: Institutionalism. In: Theory and Methods in Political Science. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2002. 90–108.
135
March JG, Olsen JP. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. The American Political Science Review 1984;78:734–49.
136
March JG, Olsen JP. Chapter 1: Elaborating the ‘New Institutionalism’. In: The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991000514369707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
137
North DC. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003235039707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
138
Parsons DW. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: : Edward Elgar 1996.
139
Peters BG. Political institutions: old and new. In: A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1996. https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198294719.001.0001/acprof-9780198294719-chapter-7
140
Rhodes RAW. Chapter 4: The institutional approach. In: Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: : Open University Press 1997. 63–84.
141
Rothstein B. Political institutions: an overview. In: A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1998. https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198294719.001.0001/acprof-9780198294719-chapter-4
142
Schmidt VA. Give peace a chance: reconciling four (not three) ‘New Institutionalisms’. 2012.http://readinglists.exeter.ac.uk/Resource List Odd Links/POL1044/POL1044_01.pdf
143
Selznick P. Institutionalism ‘Old’ and ‘New’. Administrative Science Quarterly 1996;41:270–7.
144
Cairney P. Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004572109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
145
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009.
146
Asare BE, Studlar DT. Lesson-drawing and public policy: secondhand smoking restrictions in Scotland and England. Policy Studies 2009;30:365–82.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=43211259&site=eds-live&scope=site
147
Atikcan EÖ. Diffusion in Referendum Campaigns: The Case of EU Constitutional Referendums. Journal of European Integration 2015;37:451–70.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000352698800003&site=eds-live&scope=site
148
Bennett CJ. Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross-National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability. Governance 1997;10:213–33.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=A1997XM82200001&site=eds-live&scope=site
149
Benson D, Jordan A. Policy Transfer Research: Still Evolving, Not Yet Through? Political Studies Review 2012;10:333–8.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00273.x
150
Carroll P, Common R. Policy Transfer and Learning in Public Policy and Management: International Contexts, Content and Development. London: : Routledge 2013.
151
Clarke J, Bainton D, Lendvai N, et al. Making Policy Move: Towards a Politics of Translation and Assemblage. Bristol: : Policy Press 2015. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001068979707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
152
Carroll P, Common R. Policy Transfer and Learning in Public Policy and Management: International Contexts, Content and Development. London: : Routledge 2013.
153
Dolowitz D, Marsh D. Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature. Political Studies 1996;44:343–57.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=9607113359&site=eds-live&scope=site
154
Dolowitz DP, Marsh D. Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance 2000;13:5–23.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=3556331&site=eds-live&scope=site
155
Dunlop CA. Policy transfer as learning: capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies 2009;30:289–311.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=43211253&site=eds-live&scope=site
156
Dunlop CA. Principal-Agent Modelling and Learning: The European Commission, Experts and Agricultural Hormone Growth Promoters. Public Policy and Administration 2009;30:291–313.
157
Dunlop CA, Radaelli CM. Systematising Policy Learning: From Monolith to Dimensions. Political Studies 2013;61:599–619.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=89944812&site=eds-live&scope=site
158
Evans M. Policy Transfer in Critical Perspective. Policy Studies 2009;30:243–68.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=43211255&site=eds-live&scope=site
159
Freeman R. Learning in public policy. In: The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199548453-e-017
160
James O, Lodge M. The Limitations of ‘Policy Transfer’ and ‘Lesson Drawing’ for Public Policy Research. Political Studies Review 2003;1:179–93.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=9614857&site=eds-live&scope=site
161
Manwaring R. The Big Society in Australia: A Case of ‘Non’-Policy Transfer? Australian Journal of Public Administration 2016;75:191–201.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=115831483&site=eds-live&scope=site
162
Moss P. Sure start. Journal of Education Policy 2004;19:631–4.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ681764&site=eds-live&scope=site
163
Peck J. Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography 2011;35:773–97.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eih&AN=67513921&site=eds-live&scope=site
164
Peck J, Theodore N. Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 2015. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001068879707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
165
Rose R. Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space. Chatham, N.J: : Chatham House Publishers 1993.
166
Shawki N. Transnationalism and Diffusion: A Study of the Food Sovereignty Movements in the UK and Canada. Globalizations 2015;12:758–73.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eih&AN=108976634&site=eds-live&scope=site
167
Weible CM, Sabatier PA, editors. Theories of the Policy Process. Fourth edition. Abingdon: : Routledge 2018. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991008241689707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
168
Stone D. Learning Lessons and Transferring Policy across Time, Space and Disciplines. Politics 1999;19:51–9.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asx&AN=3253928&site=eds-live&scope=site
169
Stone D. Global Public Policy, Transnational Policy Communities, and their Networks. Policy Studies Journal 2008;36:19–38.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=32089528&site=eds-live&scope=site
170
Stone D. Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies 2012;33:483–99.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000310737200002&site=eds-live&scope=site
171
Wolman H. Understanding Cross National Policy Transfers: The Case of Britain and the US. Governance 1992;5:27–45.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=64302407&site=eds-live&scope=site
172
Arentsen MJ, Bressers HThA, O’Toole LJ. Institutional and Policy Responses to Uncertainty in Environmental Policy: A Comparison of Dutch and U.S. Styles. Policy Studies Journal 2000;28:597–611.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=3944404&site=eds-live&scope=site
173
Baggot R. From Confrontation to Consultation? Pressure Group Relations From Thatcher to Major. Parliamentary Affairs 1995;48:484–502.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswst&AN=edswst.408347&site=eds-live&scope=site
174
Cairney P. The New British Policy Style: From a British to a Scottish Political Tradition? Political Studies Review 2011;9:208–20.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000289299200006&site=eds-live&scope=site
175
Freeman GP. National Styles and Policy Sectors: Explaining Structured Variation. Journal of Public Policy 1985;5:467–96.
176
Hay C. Globalization and public policy. In: The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199548453-e-029
177
Hayward J. National Aptitudes for Planning in Britain, France, and Italy. Government and Opposition 1974;9:397–410.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.44482280&site=eds-live&scope=site
178
Heidenheimer AJ, Heclo H, Adams CT. Comparative Public Policy: The Politics of Social Choice in Europe and America. 2nd ed. London: : Macmillan 1983.
179
Hennessy P. The Blair Style of Government: An Historical Perspective and an Interim Audit. Government and Opposition 1998;33:3–20.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.44484074&site=eds-live&scope=site
180
Hennessy P. The Blair Government in Historical Perspective: An Analysis of the Power Relationships within New Labour. History Today 2002;52:21–5.
181
Howlett M. Administrative styles and the Iimits of administrative reform: A neo-institutional analysis of administrative cuIture. Canadian Public Administration/Administration Publique du Canada 2003;46:471–94.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb01588.x
182
Jordan AG, Richardson JJ. Chapter 4: The British Policy Style or the Logic of Negotiation. In: Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: : Allen & Unwin 1982. 80–110.
183
Knill C. European Policies: The Impact of National Administrative Traditions. Journal of Public Policy 1998;18:1–28.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.4007599&site=eds-live&scope=site
184
Maassen P, Moen E, Stensaker B. Reforming higher education in the Netherlands and Norway: the role of the state and national modes of governance. Policy Studies 2011;32:479–95.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=65928216&site=eds-live&scope=site
185
Mamudu H, Cairney P, Studlar D. 'Global Public Policy’: Does the New Venue for Transnational Tobacco Control Challenge the Old Way of Doing Things? Public Administration Published Online First: 2015.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=112050732&site=eds-live&scope=site
186
Maioni A. Parting at the Crossroads: The Development of Health Insurance in Canada and the United States, 1940-1965. Comparative Politics 1997;29:411–31.
187
Reinicke WH. Global Public Policy. Foreign Affairs 1997;76:127–38.
188
Steinmo S. Political Institutions and Tax Policy in the United States, Sweden, and Britain. World Politics 1989;41:500–35.
189
Stone D. Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy 2004;11:545–66.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000222470200008&site=eds-live&scope=site
190
Geva-May I. Riding the Wave of Opportunity: Termination in Public Policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2004;14:309–33.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.3525839&site=eds-live&scope=site
191
Howlett M. Pages 191-192: The Outcomes of Policy Evaluation: Policy Feedback and Policy Termination. In: Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009. 191–2.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1fc78e34-0b3a-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
192
Hogwood BW, Peters BG. Policy Dynamics. Brighton: : Wheatsheaf Books 1983.
193
Lindblom CE. The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review 1959;19:79–88.
194
Patashnik EM. Ideas, Inheritances, and the Dynamics of Budgetary Change. Governance 1999;12:147–74.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=3253567&site=eds-live&scope=site
195
Pierson P. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. The American Political Science Review 2000;94:251–67.
196
Rose R. Do Parties Make a Difference? Expanded 2nd ed. London: : Macmillan 1984.
197
Rose R, Davies PL. Inheritance in Public Policy: Change Without Choice in Britain. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1994. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004284939707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
198
Bardach E. Policy Termination as a Political Process. Policy Sciences 1976;7:123–31.
199
Bothun D, Comer JC. The Politics of Termination: Concepts and Process. Policy Studies Journal 1979;7:540–53.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=12337589&site=eds-live&scope=site
200
Brewer GD. Termination: Hard Choices, Harder Questions. Public Administration Review 1978;38:338–44.
201
Daniels MR. Organizational Termination and Policy Continuation: Closing the Oklahoma Public Training Schools. Policy Sciences 1995;28:301–16.
202
de Leon P. Public Policy Termination: An End and a Beginning. Policy Analysis 1978;4:369–92.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.42783546&site=eds-live&scope=site
203
Dommett K, Skelcher C. Opening the Black Box of Administrative Reform: A Strategic-Relational Analysis. International Public Management Journal 2014;17:540–63.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000346063800005&site=eds-live&scope=site
204
Frantz JE. Reviving and Revising a Termination Model. Policy Sciences 1992;25:175–89.
205
Frantz JE. Political Resources for Policy Terminators. Policy Studies Journal 2002;30:11–28.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=6981132&site=eds-live&scope=site
206
Graddy EA, Ye K. When Do We ‘Just Say No’? Policy Termination Decisions in Local Hospital Services. Policy Studies Journal 2008;36:219–42.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=31625495&site=eds-live&scope=site
207
Jordan A, Bauer MW, Green-Pedersen C. Policy dismantling. Journal of European Public Policy 2013;20:795–805.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000318151200010&site=eds-live&scope=site
208
Jordana J. Multiple Crises and Policy Dismantling in Spain: Political Strategies and Distributive Implications. Political Studies Review 2014;12:224–38.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000333833100005&site=eds-live&scope=site
209
O’Leary C. Agency Termination in the UK: What Explains the ‘Bonfire of the Quangos’? West European Politics 2015;38:1327–44.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402382.2015.1010273
210
Parsons WD. Pages 570-579. In: Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: : Edward Elgar 1996. 570–9.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a4987ce9-c03a-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
211
Sato H. Abolition of Leprosy Isolation Policy in Japan. Policy Termination through Leadership. Policy Studies Journal 2002;30:29–46.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=6981155&site=eds-live&scope=site
212
Wise CR, O’Leary R. Breaking up is Hard to Do: The Dissolution of Judicial Supervision of Public Services. Public Administration Review 2003;63:177–91.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=9199204&site=eds-live&scope=site
213
Hill MJ, Hupe PL. Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and Practice. London: : Sage 2002. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=37015&entityid=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
214
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009.
215
Anderson JE. Public Policy-Making. London: : Nelson 1975.
216
Birrell D. Devolution and quangos in the United Kingdom: the implementation of principles and policies for rationalisation and democratisation. Policy Studies 2008;29:35–49.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=30024654&site=eds-live&scope=site
217
Browne A, Wildavsky A. Chapter 10: Implementation as Mutual Adjustment. In: Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1984. 206–31.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3d081cfd-9e76-e611-80c6-005056af4099
218
Burch M, Wood B. Chapter 7: The Products of Government: Carrying out Intentions. In: Public Policy in Britain. Oxford: : Robertson 1983. 167–92.
219
Forbes T, Evans D, Scott N. Implementing health and social care policy – England and Scotland compared. Policy Studies 2010;31:591–611.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=55309034&site=eds-live&scope=site
220
Fyfe G, Johnston Miller K, McTavish D. 'Muddling through’ in a devolved polity: implementation of equal opportunities policy in Scotland. Policy Studies 2009;30:203–19.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=37840442&site=eds-live&scope=site
221
Hill M. Implementation Theory: Yesterday’s Issue? Policy and Politics 1997;25:375–85.
222
Hill MJ. The Public Policy Process. 6th ed. Harlow: : Pearson 2013. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003121949707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
223
Hogwood BW, Gunn LA. Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1984.
224
Howlett M. Chapter 7: Policy Implementation. In: Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009. 160–77.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c023ff1d-0f3a-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
225
Hupe PL. The Thesis of Incongruent Implementation: Revisiting Pressman and Wildavsky. Public Policy and Administration 2011;26:63–80.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=60978946&site=eds-live&scope=site
226
Hupe P. What happens on the ground: Persistent issues in implementation research. Public Policy and Administration 2014;29:164–82.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000209645700006&site=eds-live&scope=site
227
Hupe P, Hill M, Nangia M. Studying implementation beyond deficit analysis: The top-down view reconsidered. Public Policy and Administration 2014;29:145–63.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000209645700005&site=eds-live&scope=site
228
James S. Chapter 5: Implementation and policy review. In: British Government: A Reader in Policy Making. London: : Routledge 1997. 152–70.
229
Parsons DW. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: : Edward Elgar 1996.
230
Riccucci NM. Implementing welfare reform in Michigan: The role of street-level bureaucrats. International Journal of Public Administration 2002;25:901–21.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=7086659&site=eds-live&scope=site
231
Allen C. ‘They just don’t live and breathe the policy like we do…’: Policy intentions and practice dilemmas in modern social policy and implementation networks. Policy Studies 2001;22:149–66.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=5706948&site=eds-live&scope=site
232
Anderson JE. Public Policy-Making. London: : Nelson 1975.
233
Beletsky L, Macalino GE, Burris S. Attitudes of police officers towards syringe access, occupational needle-sticks, and drug use: A qualitative study of one city police department in the United States. International Journal of Drug Policy 2005;16:267–74.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselp&AN=S0955395905000502&site=eds-live&scope=site
234
Dunér A, Nordström M. The discretion and power of street-level bureaucrats: an example from Swedish municipal eldercare. European Journal of Social Work 2006;9:425–44.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105936431&site=eds-live&scope=site
235
Gunn LA. Why is implementation so difficult? Management Services in Government 1978;33:169–76.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=20a52578-a676-e611-80c6-005056af4099
236
Hill M. The Policy Process in the Modern State. 3rd ed. London: : Prentice Hall 1997.
237
Hogwood BW. From Crisis to Complacency?: Shaping Public Policy in Britain. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1987.
238
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009.
239
James S. Chapter 5: Implementation and policy review. In: British Government: A Reader in Policy Making. London: : Routledge 1997. 152–69.
240
Jackson PM. Chapter 2: Economic policy. In: Implementing Thatcherite Policies: Audit of an Era. Buckingham: : Open University Press 1992. 11–31.
241
May PJ. Implementation failures revisited: Policy regime perspectives. Public Policy and Administration 2015;30:277–99.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000371128400005&site=eds-live&scope=site
242
Parsons DW. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: : Edward Elgar 1996.
243
Davies H, Nutley S, Walter I. Academic Advice to Practitioners? The Role and Use of Research-Based Evidence. Public Money and Management 2007;27:232–5.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=26149332&site=eds-live&scope=site
244
Dunlop CA. The temporal dimension of knowledge and the limits of policy appraisal: biofuels policy in the UK. Policy Sciences 2009;43:343–63.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.40926879&site=eds-live&scope=site
245
Nutley SM, Homel P. Delivering evidence-based practice: lessons from the implementation of the UK Crime Reduction Programme. Evidence and Policy 2008;2:5–26.
246
Radaelli CM. The role of knowledge in the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy 1995;2:159–83.
247
Young K, Ashby D, Boaz A, et al. Social science and the evidence-based policy movement. Social Policy and Society 2002;1.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&pdftype=1&fid=110010&jid=SPS&volumeId=1&issueId=03&aid=110009
248
Bovens M, ’T Hart P, Kuipers S. The politics of policy evaluation. In: The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199548453-e-015
249
Burch M, Wood B. Public Policy in Britain. Oxford: : Robertson 1983.
250
Dunlop C, Fritsch O, Radaelli C. The appraisal of policy appraisal – learning about impact assessment. Published Online First: 2014.https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/16900
251
Hill MJ. The Public Policy Process. 6th ed. Harlow: : Pearson 2013. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780273782865
252
Hogwood BW. From Crisis to Complacency?: Shaping Public Policy in Britain. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1987.
253
Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009.
254
National Audit Office. Measuring Performance in Government Departments HC 301 Parliamentary Session 2000-01.
255
Owens S, Rayner T, Bina O. New agendas for appraisal: reflections on theory, practice, and research. Environment and Planning A 2004;36:1943–59.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ecn&AN=0761177&site=eds-live&scope=site
256
Palumbo DJ, Nachmias D. The preconditions for successful evaluation: is there an ideal paradigm? Policy Sciences 1983;16:67–79.
257
Parsons DW. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Aldershot: : Edward Elgar 1996.
258
Pollitt C. Occasional excursions: a brief history of policy evaluation in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs: A Journal of Comparative Politics 1993;46:353–62.
259
Radin B. Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Washington, D.C.: : Georgetown University Press 2000.
260
Sanderson I. Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration 2002;80:1–22.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9299.00292
261
Turnpenny J, Radaelli CM, Jordan A, et al. The policy and politics of policy appraisal: emerging trends and new directions. Journal of European Public Policy 2009;16:640–53.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000266090500010&site=eds-live&scope=site
262
Jordan A, Turnpenny J. The Tools of Policy Formulation. Edward Elgar Publishing 2015. http://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781783477036.xml
263
Walker R. Learning if policy will work: the case of New Deal for disabled people. Policy Studies 2000;21:313–32.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=3954574&site=eds-live&scope=site
264
Weiss CH. How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway? Evaluation Review 1997;21:501–24.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=9710013300&site=eds-live&scope=site
265
Weiss CH. Evaluation Research: Methods for Assessing Program Effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: : Prentice-Hall 1972.
266
Weiss CH. The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review 1979;39:426–31.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=4601599&site=eds-live&scope=site
267
Weiss CH. Where politics and evaluation research meet. Evaluation Practice 1993;14:93–106.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=53078512&site=eds-live&scope=site
268
Boin A, McConnell A, ’t Hart P. Governing After Crisis: The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991000861029707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
269
Marsh D, McConnell A. Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public Administration 2010;88:564–83.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=51374892&site=eds-live&scope=site
270
Moran M. Not steering but drowning: policy catastrophes and the regulatory state. The Political Quarterly 2001;72:414–27.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=5327002&site=eds-live&scope=site
