1.
Politics and International Relations - LibGuides at University of Exeter. http://libguides.exeter.ac.uk/PoliticsHomePage.
2.
Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. vol. Clarendon law series (Oxford University Press, 2012).
3.
Dworkin, R. Law’s Empire. (Hart, 1998).
4.
Fuller, L. L. ‘The Case of the Speluncean Explorers’ [in] Harvard Law Review. Harvard Law Review 62, 616–645 (1949).
5.
King, M. L. Letter from a Birmingham Jail. http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html (1963).
6.
Exodus 19-24. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+19-24.
7.
King, L. W. The Code of Hammurabi.
8.
Chan, W. ‘The Natural Way of Lao Tzu’ [in] A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. in A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy vol. Source Books in Asian Philosophy 136–151 (Princeton University Press, 1963).
9.
Hoff, B. The Tao of Pooh: The Principles of Taoism Demonstrated by Winnie-the-Pooh. (Egmont, 2015).
10.
Weinrib, E. J. ‘Legal Formalism: On the Immanent Rationality of Law’ [in] Yale Law Journal. Yale Law Journal 97, (1988).
11.
Llewellyn, K. N. ‘A Realistic Jurisprudence: The Next Step’ [in] Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law Review 30, 431–465 (1930).
12.
Hart, H. L. A. Chapter 1: ‘Persistent Questions’ [in] The Concept of Law. in The Concept of Law vol. Clarendon law series 1–17 (Oxford University Press, 2012).
13.
Hart, H. L. A. Chapter V: ‘Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Roles’ [in] The Concept of Law. in The Concept of Law vol. Clarendon law series 79–99 (Oxford University Press, 2012).
14.
Hart, H. L. A. Chapter VI: ‘The Foundations of a Legal System’ [in] The Concept of Law. in The Concept of Law vol. Clarendon law series 100–123 (Oxford University Press, 2012).
15.
Hart, H. L. A. Chapter VII: ‘Formalism and Rule-Scepticism’ [in] The Concept of Law. in The Concept of Law vol. Clarendon law series 124–154 (Oxford University Press, 2012).
16.
Dworkin, R. Chapter 1: ‘What is Law?’ [in] Law’s Empire. in Law’s Empire 1–44 (Hart, 1998).
17.
Dworkin, R. Chapter 2: ‘Interpretive Concepts’ [in] Law’s Empire. in Law’s Empire 45–86 (Hart, 1998).
18.
Dworkin, R. Chapter 3: ‘Jurisprudence Revisited’ [in] Law’s Empire. in Law’s Empire 87–113 (Hart, 1998).
19.
Dworkin, R. Chapter 4: ‘Conventionalism’ [in] Law’s Empire. in Law’s Empire 114–150 (Hart, 1998).
20.
Hart, H. L. A. ‘Postscript’ [in] The Concept of Law. in The Concept of Law vol. Clarendon law series 238–276 (Oxford University Press, 2012).
21.
Dennett, D. C. Chapter 1: ‘Natural Freedom’ [in] Freedom Evolves. in Freedom Evolves 1–23 (Penguin books, 2004).
22.
Dennett, D. D. Chapter 2: ‘A Tool for Thinking about Determinism’ [in] Freedom Evolves. in Freedom Evolves 25–62 (Penguin books, 2004).
23.
Rosen, J. ‘The Brain on the Stand: How Neuroscience is Transforming the Legal System’ [in] New York Times. New York Times  (1923-Current file) (2007).
24.
Kelkar, K. ‘Can a Brain Scan Uncover your Morals?’ [in] The Guardian. (2016).
25.
Gazzaniga, M. S. & Steven, M. S. ‘Free Will in the Twenty-First Century’ [in] Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice. in Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice 51–70 (Dana Press, 2004).
26.
Fugelsang, J. & Dunbar, K. ‘A Cognitive Neuroscience Framework for Understanding Causal Reasoning and the Law’ [in] Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359, 1749–1754 (2004).
27.
Vilares, I. et al. ‘Predicting the Knowledge–Recklessness Distinction in the Human Brain’ [in] Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 3222–3227 (2017).
28.
Hoffman, M. B. ‘The Neuroeconomic Path of the Law’ [in] Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359, 1667–1676 (2004).
29.
Aharoni, E. et al. ‘Neuroprediction of Future Rearrest’ [in] Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 6223–6228 (2013).
30.
Jones, O. D. ‘Law and Neuroscience’ [in] Journal of Neuroscience. Journal of Neuroscience 33, 17624–17630 (2013).
31.
Churchland, P. S. ‘Reviewed Work: The Ethical Brain by Michael S. Gazzaniga’ [in] American Scientist. American Scientist 93, 356–359 (2005).
32.
Churchland, P. S. ‘Moral Decision-Making and the Brain’ [in] Neuroethics. in Neuroethics 3–16 (Oxford University Press, 2004).
33.
Goodenough, O. R. & Prehn, K. ‘A Neuroscientific Approach to Normative Judgment in Law and Justice’ [in] Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 359, 1709–1726 (2004).
34.
Goodenough, O. R. ‘Responsibility and Punishment: Whose Mind? A Response’ [in] Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 359, 1805–1809 (2004).
35.
Greene, J. & Cohen, J. ‘For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything’ [in] Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 359, 1775–1785 (2004).
36.
Morse, S. J. ‘New Neuroscience, Old Problems: Legal Implications of Brain Science’ [in] Cerebrum. (2004).