Bibliography for POL2098 BETA

Aharoni, E., G. M. Vincent, C. L. Harenski, V. D. Calhoun, W. Sinnott-Armstrong, M. S. Gazzaniga, and K. A. Kiehl. 2013. ‘“Neuroprediction of Future Rearrest” [in] Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (15): 6223–28. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.pnas.org/content/110/15/6223.

Chan, Wing-tsit. 1963. ‘“The Natural Way of Lao Tzu” [in] A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy’. In A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy, Source Books in Asian Philosophy:136–51. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b4953ab4-24be-e711-80cb-005056af4099.

Churchland, Patricia S. 2005. ‘“Reviewed Work: The Ethical Brain by Michael S. Gazzaniga” [in] American Scientist’. American Scientist 93 (4): 356–59. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/27858612.

Churchland, Patricia Smith. 2004. ‘“Moral Decision-Making and the Brain” [in] Neuroethics’. In Neuroethics, 3–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198567219.001.0001/acprof-9780198567219-chapter-1.

Dennett, Daniel C. 2004. ‘Chapter 1: “Natural Freedom” [in] Freedom Evolves’. In Freedom Evolves, 1–23. London: Penguin books.

Dennett, Daniel D. 2004. ‘Chapter 2: “A Tool for Thinking about Determinism” [in] Freedom Evolves’. In Freedom Evolves, 25–62. London: Penguin books. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b31cecd2-49be-e711-80cb-005056af4099.

Dworkin, Ronald. 1998a. ‘Chapter 1: “What Is Law?” [in] Law’s Empire’. In Law’s Empire, 1–44. Oxford: Hart.

———. 1998b. ‘Chapter 2: “Interpretive Concepts” [in] Law’s Empire’. In Law’s Empire, 45–86. Oxford: Hart.

———. 1998c. ‘Chapter 3: “Jurisprudence Revisited” [in] Law’s Empire’. In Law’s Empire, 87–113. Oxford: Hart.

———. 1998d. ‘Chapter 4: “Conventionalism” [in] Law’s Empire’. In Law’s Empire, 114–50. Oxford: Hart.

———. 1998e. Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart.

‘Exodus 19-24’. n.d. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+19-24.

Fugelsang, Jonathan, and Keven Dunbar. 2004. ‘“A Cognitive Neuroscience Framework for Understanding Causal Reasoning and the Law” [in] Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359 (1451): 1749–54. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/359/1451/1749.

Fuller, Lon L. 1949. ‘“The Case of the Speluncean Explorers” [in] Harvard Law Review’. Harvard Law Review 62 (4): 616–45. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1336025.

Gazzaniga, Michael S., and Megan S. Steven. 2004. ‘“Free Will in the Twenty-First Century” [in] Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice’. In Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice, 51–70. New York: Dana Press.

Goodenough, Oliver R. 2004. ‘“Responsibility and Punishment: Whose Mind? A Response” [in] Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences’. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 359 (1451): 1805–9. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142165.

Goodenough, Oliver R., and Kristin Prehn. 2004. ‘“A Neuroscientific Approach to Normative Judgment in Law and Justice” [in] Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences’. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 359 (1451): 1709–26. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142156.

Greene, Joshua, and Jonathan Cohen. 2004. ‘“For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything” [in] Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences’. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 359 (1451): 1775–85. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142162.

Hart, H. L. A. 2012a. ‘Chapter 1: “Persistent Questions” [in] The Concept of Law’. In The Concept of Law, Third edition, Clarendon law series:1–17. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=eef320da-3fbe-e711-80cb-005056af4099.

———. 2012b. ‘Chapter V: “Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Roles” [in] The Concept of Law’. In The Concept of Law, Third edition, Clarendon law series:79–99. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5a467892-40be-e711-80cb-005056af4099.

———. 2012c. ‘Chapter VI: “The Foundations of a Legal System” [in] The Concept of Law’. In The Concept of Law, Third edition, Clarendon law series:100–123. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2012d. ‘Chapter VII: “Formalism and Rule-Scepticism” [in] The Concept of Law’. In The Concept of Law, Third edition, Clarendon law series:124–54. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2012e. ‘“Postscript” [in] The Concept of Law’. In The Concept of Law, Third edition, Clarendon law series:238–76. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2012f. The Concept of Law. Third edition. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Hoff, Benjamin. 2015. The Tao of Pooh: The Principles of Taoism Demonstrated by Winnie-the-Pooh. Egmont.

Hoffman, M. B. 2004. ‘“The Neuroeconomic Path of the Law” [in] Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359 (1451): 1667–76. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/359/1451/1667.

Jones, Owen D. 2013. ‘“Law and Neuroscience” [in] Journal of Neuroscience’. Journal of Neuroscience 33 (45): 17624–30. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jneurosci.org/content/33/45/17624.

Kelkar, Kamala. 2016. ‘“Can a Brain Scan Uncover Your Morals?” [in] The Guardian’. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/jan/17/can-a-brain-scan-uncover-your-morals.

King, L. W. n.d. ‘The Code of Hammurabi’. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/ancient/hamframe.asp.

King, Martin Luther. 1963. ‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail’. 1963. http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html.

Llewellyn, Karl N. 1930. ‘“A Realistic Jurisprudence: The Next Step” [in] Columbia Law Review’. Columbia Law Review 30 (4): 431–65. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1114548.

Morse, Stephen J. 2004. ‘“New Neuroscience, Old Problems: Legal Implications of Brain Science” [in] Cerebrum’. http://www.dana.org/Cerebrum/Default.aspx?id=39169.

‘Politics and International Relations - LibGuides at University of Exeter’. n.d. http://libguides.exeter.ac.uk/PoliticsHomePage.

Rosen, Jeffrey. 2007. ‘“The Brain on the Stand: How Neuroscience Is Transforming the Legal System” [in] New York Times’. New York Times  (1923-Current File). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/hnpnewyorktimes/docview/848120400/fulltextPDF/567B0DF6A7E64C8APQ/2?accountid=10792.

Vilares, Iris, Michael J. Wesley, Woo-Young Ahn, Richard J. Bonnie, Morris Hoffman, Owen D. Jones, Stephen J. Morse, Gideon Yaffe, Terry Lohrenz, and P. Read Montague. 2017. ‘“Predicting the Knowledge–Recklessness Distinction in the Human Brain” [in] Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (12): 3222–27. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.pnas.org/content/114/12/3222.

Weinrib, Ernest J. 1988. ‘“Legal Formalism: On the Immanent Rationality of Law” [in] Yale Law Journal’. Yale Law Journal 97 (6). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/796339.