Aharoni, E., Vincent, G. M., Harenski, C. L., Calhoun, V. D., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Gazzaniga, M. S., & Kiehl, K. A. (2013). ‘Neuroprediction of Future Rearrest’ [in] Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(15), 6223–6228. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.pnas.org/content/110/15/6223
Chan, W. (1963). ‘The Natural Way of Lao Tzu’ [in] A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. In A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy: Vol. Source Books in Asian Philosophy (pp. 136–151). Princeton University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b4953ab4-24be-e711-80cb-005056af4099
Churchland, P. S. (2004). ‘Moral Decision-Making and the Brain’ [in] Neuroethics. In Neuroethics (pp. 3–16). Oxford University Press. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198567219.001.0001/acprof-9780198567219-chapter-1
Churchland, P. S. (2005). ‘Reviewed Work: The Ethical Brain by Michael S. Gazzaniga’ [in] American Scientist. American Scientist, 93(4), 356–359. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/27858612
Dennett, D. C. (2004). Chapter 1: ‘Natural Freedom’ [in] Freedom Evolves. In Freedom Evolves (pp. 1–23). Penguin books.
Dennett, D. D. (2004). Chapter 2: ‘A Tool for Thinking about Determinism’ [in] Freedom Evolves. In Freedom Evolves (pp. 25–62). Penguin books. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b31cecd2-49be-e711-80cb-005056af4099
Dworkin, R. (1998a). Chapter 1: ‘What is Law?’ [in] Law’s Empire. In Law’s Empire (pp. 1–44). Hart.
Dworkin, R. (1998b). Chapter 2: ‘Interpretive Concepts’ [in] Law’s Empire. In Law’s Empire (pp. 45–86). Hart.
Dworkin, R. (1998c). Chapter 3: ‘Jurisprudence Revisited’ [in] Law’s Empire. In Law’s Empire (pp. 87–113). Hart.
Dworkin, R. (1998d). Chapter 4: ‘Conventionalism’ [in] Law’s Empire. In Law’s Empire (pp. 114–150). Hart.
Dworkin, R. (1998e). Law’s Empire. Hart.
Exodus 19-24. (n.d.). https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+19-24
Fugelsang, J., & Dunbar, K. (2004). ‘A Cognitive Neuroscience Framework for Understanding Causal Reasoning and the Law’ [in] Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1749–1754. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/359/1451/1749
Fuller, L. L. (1949). ‘The Case of the Speluncean Explorers’ [in] Harvard Law Review. Harvard Law Review, 62(4), 616–645. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1336025
Gazzaniga, M. S., & Steven, M. S. (2004). ‘Free Will in the Twenty-First Century’ [in] Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice. In Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice (pp. 51–70). Dana Press.
Goodenough, O. R. (2004). ‘Responsibility and Punishment: Whose Mind? A Response’ [in] Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1805–1809. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142165
Goodenough, O. R., & Prehn, K. (2004). ‘A Neuroscientific Approach to Normative Judgment in Law and Justice’ [in] Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1709–1726. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142156
Greene, J., & Cohen, J. (2004). ‘For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything’ [in] Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1775–1785. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142162
Hart, H. L. A. (2012a). Chapter 1: ‘Persistent Questions’ [in] The Concept of Law. In The Concept of Law: Vol. Clarendon law series (Third edition, pp. 1–17). Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=eef320da-3fbe-e711-80cb-005056af4099
Hart, H. L. A. (2012b). Chapter V: ‘Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Roles’ [in] The Concept of Law. In The Concept of Law: Vol. Clarendon law series (Third edition, pp. 79–99). Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5a467892-40be-e711-80cb-005056af4099
Hart, H. L. A. (2012c). Chapter VI: ‘The Foundations of a Legal System’ [in] The Concept of Law. In The Concept of Law: Vol. Clarendon law series (Third edition, pp. 100–123). Oxford University Press.
Hart, H. L. A. (2012d). Chapter VII: ‘Formalism and Rule-Scepticism’ [in] The Concept of Law. In The Concept of Law: Vol. Clarendon law series (Third edition, pp. 124–154). Oxford University Press.
Hart, H. L. A. (2012e). ‘Postscript’ [in] The Concept of Law. In The Concept of Law: Vol. Clarendon law series (Third edition, pp. 238–276). Oxford University Press.
Hart, H. L. A. (2012f). The Concept of Law: Vol. Clarendon law series (Third edition). Oxford University Press.
Hoff, B. (2015). The Tao of Pooh: The Principles of Taoism Demonstrated by Winnie-the-Pooh. Egmont.
Hoffman, M. B. (2004). ‘The Neuroeconomic Path of the Law’ [in] Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1667–1676. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/359/1451/1667
Jones, O. D. (2013). ‘Law and Neuroscience’ [in] Journal of Neuroscience. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(45), 17624–17630. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jneurosci.org/content/33/45/17624
Kelkar, K. (2016). ‘Can a Brain Scan Uncover your Morals?’ [in] The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/jan/17/can-a-brain-scan-uncover-your-morals
King, L. W. (n.d.). The Code of Hammurabi. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/ancient/hamframe.asp
King, M. L. (1963). Letter from a Birmingham Jail. http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
Llewellyn, K. N. (1930). ‘A Realistic Jurisprudence: The Next Step’ [in] Columbia Law Review. Columbia Law Review, 30(4), 431–465. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1114548
Morse, S. J. (2004). ‘New Neuroscience, Old Problems: Legal Implications of Brain Science’ [in] Cerebrum. http://www.dana.org/Cerebrum/Default.aspx?id=39169
Politics and International Relations - LibGuides at University of Exeter. (n.d.). http://libguides.exeter.ac.uk/PoliticsHomePage
Rosen, J. (2007). ‘The Brain on the Stand: How Neuroscience is Transforming the Legal System’ [in] New York Times. New York Times (1923-Current File). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/hnpnewyorktimes/docview/848120400/fulltextPDF/567B0DF6A7E64C8APQ/2?accountid=10792
Vilares, I., Wesley, M. J., Ahn, W.-Y., Bonnie, R. J., Hoffman, M., Jones, O. D., Morse, S. J., Yaffe, G., Lohrenz, T., & Montague, P. R. (2017). ‘Predicting the Knowledge–Recklessness Distinction in the Human Brain’ [in] Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(12), 3222–3227. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.pnas.org/content/114/12/3222
Weinrib, E. J. (1988). ‘Legal Formalism: On the Immanent Rationality of Law’ [in] Yale Law Journal. Yale Law Journal, 97(6). https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/796339
