Aharoni, E. et al. ‘“Neuroprediction of Future Rearrest” [in] Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110.15 (2013): 6223–6228. Web. <https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.pnas.org/content/110/15/6223>.
Chan, Wing-tsit. ‘“The Natural Way of Lao Tzu” [in] A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy’. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Source Books in Asian Philosophy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1963. 136–151. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b4953ab4-24be-e711-80cb-005056af4099>.
Churchland, Patricia S. ‘“Reviewed Work: The Ethical Brain by Michael S. Gazzaniga” [in] American Scientist’. American Scientist 93.4 (2005): 356–359. Web. <https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/27858612>.
Churchland, Patricia Smith. ‘“Moral Decision-Making and the Brain” [in] Neuroethics’. Neuroethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. 3–16. Web. <https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198567219.001.0001/acprof-9780198567219-chapter-1>.
Dennett, Daniel C. ‘Chapter 1: “Natural Freedom” [in] Freedom Evolves’. Freedom Evolves. London: Penguin books, 2004. 1–23. Print.
Dennett, Daniel D. ‘Chapter 2: “A Tool for Thinking about Determinism” [in] Freedom Evolves’. Freedom Evolves. London: Penguin books, 2004. 25–62. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b31cecd2-49be-e711-80cb-005056af4099>.
Dworkin, Ronald. ‘Chapter 1: “What Is Law?” [in] Law’s Empire’. Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart, 1998. 1–44. Print.
---. ‘Chapter 2: “Interpretive Concepts” [in] Law’s Empire’. Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart, 1998. 45–86. Print.
---. ‘Chapter 3: “Jurisprudence Revisited” [in] Law’s Empire’. Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart, 1998. 87–113. Print.
---. ‘Chapter 4: “Conventionalism” [in] Law’s Empire’. Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart, 1998. 114–150. Print.
---. Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart, 1998. Print.
‘Exodus 19-24’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+19-24>.
Fugelsang, Jonathan, and Keven Dunbar. ‘“A Cognitive Neuroscience Framework for Understanding Causal Reasoning and the Law” [in] Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359.1451 (2004): 1749–1754. Web. <https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/359/1451/1749>.
Fuller, Lon L. ‘“The Case of the Speluncean Explorers” [in] Harvard Law Review’. Harvard Law Review 62.4 (1949): 616–645. Web. <https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1336025>.
Gazzaniga, Michael S., and Megan S. Steven. ‘“Free Will in the Twenty-First Century” [in] Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice’. Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice. New York: Dana Press, 2004. 51–70. Print.
Goodenough, Oliver R. ‘“Responsibility and Punishment: Whose Mind? A Response” [in] Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences’. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 359.1451 (2004): 1805–1809. Web. <https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142165>.
Goodenough, Oliver R., and Kristin Prehn. ‘“A Neuroscientific Approach to Normative Judgment in Law and Justice” [in] Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences’. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 359.1451 (2004): 1709–1726. Web. <https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142156>.
Greene, Joshua, and Jonathan Cohen. ‘“For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything” [in] Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences’. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 359.1451 (2004): 1775–1785. Web. <https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142162>.
Hart, H. L. A. ‘Chapter 1: “Persistent Questions” [in] The Concept of Law’. The Concept of Law. Third edition. Clarendon law series. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2012. 1–17. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=eef320da-3fbe-e711-80cb-005056af4099>.
---. ‘Chapter V: “Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Roles” [in] The Concept of Law’. The Concept of Law. Third edition. Clarendon law series. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2012. 79–99. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5a467892-40be-e711-80cb-005056af4099>.
---. ‘Chapter VI: “The Foundations of a Legal System” [in] The Concept of Law’. The Concept of Law. Third edition. Clarendon law series. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2012. 100–123. Print.
---. ‘Chapter VII: “Formalism and Rule-Scepticism” [in] The Concept of Law’. The Concept of Law. Third edition. Clarendon law series. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2012. 124–154. Print.
---. ‘“Postscript” [in] The Concept of Law’. The Concept of Law. Third edition. Clarendon law series. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2012. 238–276. Print.
---. The Concept of Law. Third edition. Clarendon law series. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
Hoff, Benjamin. The Tao of Pooh: The Principles of Taoism Demonstrated by Winnie-the-Pooh. Egmont, 2015. Print.
Hoffman, M. B. ‘“The Neuroeconomic Path of the Law” [in] Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359.1451 (2004): 1667–1676. Web. <https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/359/1451/1667>.
Jones, Owen D. ‘“Law and Neuroscience” [in] Journal of Neuroscience’. Journal of Neuroscience 33.45 (2013): 17624–17630. Web. <https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jneurosci.org/content/33/45/17624>.
Kelkar, Kamala. ‘“Can a Brain Scan Uncover Your Morals?” [in] The Guardian’. (2016): n. pag. Web. <https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/jan/17/can-a-brain-scan-uncover-your-morals>.
King, L. W. ‘The Code of Hammurabi’. Web. <http://avalon.law.yale.edu/ancient/hamframe.asp>.
King, Martin Luther. ‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail’. N.p., 1963. Web. <http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html>.
Llewellyn, Karl N. ‘“A Realistic Jurisprudence: The Next Step” [in] Columbia Law Review’. Columbia Law Review 30.4 (1930): 431–465. Web. <https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1114548>.
Morse, Stephen J. ‘“New Neuroscience, Old Problems: Legal Implications of Brain Science” [in] Cerebrum’. (2004): n. pag. Web. <http://www.dana.org/Cerebrum/Default.aspx?id=39169>.
‘Politics and International Relations - LibGuides at University of Exeter’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://libguides.exeter.ac.uk/PoliticsHomePage>.
Rosen, Jeffrey. ‘“The Brain on the Stand: How Neuroscience Is Transforming the Legal System” [in] New York Times’. New York Times (1923-Current file) (2007): n. pag. Web. <https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/hnpnewyorktimes/docview/848120400/fulltextPDF/567B0DF6A7E64C8APQ/2?accountid=10792>.
Vilares, Iris et al. ‘“Predicting the Knowledge–Recklessness Distinction in the Human Brain” [in] Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114.12 (2017): 3222–3227. Web. <https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.pnas.org/content/114/12/3222>.
Weinrib, Ernest J. ‘“Legal Formalism: On the Immanent Rationality of Law” [in] Yale Law Journal’. Yale Law Journal 97.6 (1988): n. pag. Web. <https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/796339>.
