Aharoni, E., G. M. Vincent, C. L. Harenski, V. D. Calhoun, W. Sinnott-Armstrong, M. S. Gazzaniga, and K. A. Kiehl. 2013. ‘“Neuroprediction of Future Rearrest” [in] Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(15):6223–28.
Anon. n.d.-a. ‘Exodus 19-24’. Retrieved (https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+19-24).
Anon. n.d.-b. ‘Politics and International Relations - LibGuides at University of Exeter’. Retrieved (http://libguides.exeter.ac.uk/PoliticsHomePage).
Chan, Wing-tsit. 1963. ‘“The Natural Way of Lao Tzu” [in] A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy’. Pp. 136–51 in A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Vol. Source Books in Asian Philosophy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Churchland, Patricia S. 2005. ‘“Reviewed Work: The Ethical Brain by Michael S. Gazzaniga” [in] American Scientist’. American Scientist 93(4):356–59.
Churchland, Patricia Smith. 2004. ‘“Moral Decision-Making and the Brain” [in] Neuroethics’. Pp. 3–16 in Neuroethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dennett, Daniel C. 2004. ‘Chapter 1: “Natural Freedom” [in] Freedom Evolves’. Pp. 1–23 in Freedom Evolves. London: Penguin books.
Dennett, Daniel D. 2004. ‘Chapter 2: “A Tool for Thinking about Determinism” [in] Freedom Evolves’. Pp. 25–62 in Freedom Evolves. London: Penguin books.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1998a. ‘Chapter 1: “What Is Law?” [in] Law’s Empire’. Pp. 1–44 in Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1998b. ‘Chapter 2: “Interpretive Concepts” [in] Law’s Empire’. Pp. 45–86 in Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1998c. ‘Chapter 3: “Jurisprudence Revisited” [in] Law’s Empire’. Pp. 87–113 in Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1998d. ‘Chapter 4: “Conventionalism” [in] Law’s Empire’. Pp. 114–50 in Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1998e. Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart.
Fugelsang, Jonathan, and Keven Dunbar. 2004. ‘“A Cognitive Neuroscience Framework for Understanding Causal Reasoning and the Law” [in] Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359(1451):1749–54.
Fuller, Lon L. 1949. ‘“The Case of the Speluncean Explorers” [in] Harvard Law Review’. Harvard Law Review 62(4):616–45.
Gazzaniga, Michael S., and Megan S. Steven. 2004. ‘“Free Will in the Twenty-First Century” [in] Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice’. Pp. 51–70 in Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind, and the Scales of Justice. New York: Dana Press.
Goodenough, Oliver R. 2004. ‘“Responsibility and Punishment: Whose Mind? A Response” [in] Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences’. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 359(1451):1805–9.
Goodenough, Oliver R., and Kristin Prehn. 2004. ‘“A Neuroscientific Approach to Normative Judgment in Law and Justice” [in] Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences’. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 359(1451):1709–26.
Greene, Joshua, and Jonathan Cohen. 2004. ‘“For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything” [in] Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences’. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 359(1451):1775–85.
Hart, H. L. A. 2012a. ‘Chapter 1: “Persistent Questions” [in] The Concept of Law’. Pp. 1–17 in The Concept of Law. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Hart, H. L. A. 2012b. ‘Chapter V: “Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Roles” [in] The Concept of Law’. Pp. 79–99 in The Concept of Law. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Hart, H. L. A. 2012c. ‘Chapter VI: “The Foundations of a Legal System” [in] The Concept of Law’. Pp. 100–123 in The Concept of Law. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Hart, H. L. A. 2012d. ‘Chapter VII: “Formalism and Rule-Scepticism” [in] The Concept of Law’. Pp. 124–54 in The Concept of Law. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Hart, H. L. A. 2012e. ‘“Postscript” [in] The Concept of Law’. Pp. 238–76 in The Concept of Law. Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Hart, H. L. A. 2012f. The Concept of Law. Vol. Clarendon law series. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Hoff, Benjamin. 2015. The Tao of Pooh: The Principles of Taoism Demonstrated by Winnie-the-Pooh. Egmont.
Hoffman, M. B. 2004. ‘“The Neuroeconomic Path of the Law” [in] Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359(1451):1667–76.
Jones, Owen D. 2013. ‘“Law and Neuroscience” [in] Journal of Neuroscience’. Journal of Neuroscience 33(45):17624–30.
Kelkar, Kamala. 2016. ‘“Can a Brain Scan Uncover Your Morals?” [in] The Guardian’.
King, L. W. n.d. ‘The Code of Hammurabi’.
King, Martin Luther. 1963. ‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail’. Retrieved (http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html).
Llewellyn, Karl N. 1930. ‘“A Realistic Jurisprudence: The Next Step” [in] Columbia Law Review’. Columbia Law Review 30(4):431–65.
Morse, Stephen J. 2004. ‘“New Neuroscience, Old Problems: Legal Implications of Brain Science” [in] Cerebrum’.
Rosen, Jeffrey. 2007. ‘“The Brain on the Stand: How Neuroscience Is Transforming the Legal System” [in] New York Times’. New York Times  (1923-Current File).
Vilares, Iris, Michael J. Wesley, Woo-Young Ahn, Richard J. Bonnie, Morris Hoffman, Owen D. Jones, Stephen J. Morse, Gideon Yaffe, Terry Lohrenz, and P. Read Montague. 2017. ‘“Predicting the Knowledge–Recklessness Distinction in the Human Brain” [in] Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(12):3222–27.
Weinrib, Ernest J. 1988. ‘“Legal Formalism: On the Immanent Rationality of Law” [in] Yale Law Journal’. Yale Law Journal 97(6).