1
Sociology - LibGuides at University of Exeter. http://libguides.exeter.ac.uk/SociologyHomePage
2
Gibbon S, Prainsack B, Hilgartner S, et al. Routledge Handbook of Genomics, Health and Society. London: : Routledge 2018. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991006732859707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
3
Atkinson P, Glasner P, Lock M. Handbook of Genetics and Society: Mapping the New Genomic Era. London: : Routledge 2009. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991006732889707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
4
Barnes B, Dupré J. Genomes and What to Make of Them. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2008. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991006732929707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
5
Franklin S. Dolly Mixtures: The Remaking of Genealogy. Durham: : Duke University Press 2007. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=302312&entityid=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
6
Haraway D. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. London: : Routledge 1997. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991006774389707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
7
Hinchliffe S, Woodward K. The Natural and the Social: Uncertainty, Risk, and Change. Second edition. London: : Routledge 2015. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781136891526
8
Latour B. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1988.
9
Meloni M, Cromby J, Fitzgerald D, et al. The Palgrave Handbook of Biology and Society. London: : Palgrave Macmillan 2018. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781137528797
10
Parry S, Dupre J, editors. Nature After the Genome. Malden, MA: : Wiley-Blackwell/The Sociological Review 2010.
11
Rabinow P. French DNA: Trouble in Purgatory. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2017. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991006733039707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
12
Sunder Rajan K. Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham, NC: : Duke University Press 2006. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780822388005
13
Sunder Rajan K. Pharmocracy: Value, Politics, and Knowledge in Global Biomedicine. Durham, NC: : Duke University Press 2017. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004748079707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
14
Rose N. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2006. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991015010859707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
15
Richardson SS, Stevens H. Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome. Durham, NC: : Duke University Press 2015. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004748129707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
16
Bedau M, Cleland CE. The Nature of Life: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives from Philosophy and Science. Cambridge University Press 2010. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991000759149707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
17
Dupré J. Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001532729707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
18
Grene M, Depew D. The Philosophy of Biology: An Episodic History. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003202279707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
19
Hull DL. Philosophy of Biological Science. Englewood Cliffs: : Prentice-Hall 1974.
20
Hull DL, Ruse M. The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991015275109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
21
Matthen M, Stephens C. Philosophy of Biology. Amsterdam: : Elsevier 2007. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991006733139707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
22
Mayr E. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist. Cambridge, Mass: : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1988.
23
O’Malley M. Philosophy of Microbiology. Cambridge University Press 2014. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.cambridge.org/core/books/philosophy-of-microbiology/66F30F77991E16732EA7ED6E51314BBE
24
Ruse M. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991000518369707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
25
Sarkar S, Plutynski A. A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Malden, MA: : Blackwell Pub 2008. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991000545569707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
26
Sober E. Philosophy of Biology. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: : Westview Press 2018. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991006733169707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
27
Schaffner KF. Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1993.
28
Sterelny K, Griffiths PE. Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. Chicago, Ill: : University of Chicago Press 1999.
29
Wimsatt WC. Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 2007.
30
Allen GE. Life Science in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1979.
31
Bowler PJ. Evolution: The History of an Idea. 3rd ed., Completely rev. and expanded. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 2003. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991015772629707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
32
Coleman W. Biology in the Nineteenth Century: Problems of Form, Function and Transformation. Cambridge [etc.]: : Cambridge University Press 1977.
33
Dietrich M, Borrello M, Harman O. Handbook of the Historiography of Biology. Cham: : Springer 2019. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991007660869707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
34
Fleck L, Trenn TJ, Merton RK. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1981.
35
Judson HF. The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Biology. Expanded ed. Plainview, N.Y.: : CSHL Press 1996.
36
Laubichler MD, Maienschein J. From Embryology to Evo-Devo: A History of Developmental Evolution. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2007. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991000543609707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
37
Müller-Wille S, Rheinberger H-J. A Cultural History of Heredity. Chicago, Il: : University of Chicago Press 2012. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991001382559707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
38
Morange M. A History of Molecular Biology. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1998.
39
Mayr E. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance. Cambridge, Mass: : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1982.
40
Rheinberger H-J. An Epistemology of the Concrete: Twentieth-Century Histories of Life. Durham, NC: : Duke University Press 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780822391333
41
Sapp J. Genesis: The Evolution of Biology. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195156195.001.0001/acprof-9780195156195
42
Biological Theory. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991015573219707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
43
Biology and Philosophy. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991013241519707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
44
BioSocieties. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991002493739707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
45
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991002916619707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
46
New Genetics and Society. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/openurl?genre=journal&stitle=cngs20
47
Journal of the History of Biology. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991015050169707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
48
Studies in History and Philosophy of Sciences Part C. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991015612629707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
49
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991015632229707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
50
Haldane JBS. Daedalus: Or Science and the Future (A paper read to the Heretics, Cambridge, on February 4th, 1923). 6th impression. London: : Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & co, ltd 1925. https://www.marxists.org/archive/haldane/works/1920s/daedalus.htm
51
Polanyi M. ‘Life’s Irreducible Structure’. Science 1968;160:1308–12.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.1724152&site=eds-live&scope=site
52
Jacob F. Evolution and tinkering. Science 1977;196:1161–6.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/1744610
53
Beatty J. Why do Biologists Argue Like They do? Philosophy of Science 1997;64:S432–43.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/188423
54
Brandon RN. ‘Does Biology Have Laws? The Experimental Evidence’. Philosophy of Science 1997;64:S444–57.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.188424&site=eds-live&scope=site
55
Sober E. ‘Two Outbreaks of Lawlessness in Recent Philosophy of Biology’. Philosophy of Science 1997;64:S458–67.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.188425&site=eds-live&scope=site
56
Mitchell SD. ‘Pragmatic Laws’. Philosophy of Science 1997;64:S468–79.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.188426&site=eds-live&scope=site
57
Garson J. Chapter 28 - ‘Function and Teleology’. In: A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Malden, MA: : Blackwell Pub 2008. 525–49.https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991000545569707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
58
Rosenberg A. Chapter 7 - ‘Reductionism (and Antireductionism) in Biology’. In: The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. 2007. 120–38.https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991015275109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
59
Beatty J. ‘What’s Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?’ PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980;1980:397–426.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.192601&site=eds-live&scope=site
60
Beatty J. ‘Why do Biologists Argue Like They do?’ Philosophy of Science 1997;64:S432–43.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.188423&site=eds-live&scope=site
61
Brigandt I, Love A. ‘Reductionism in Biology’. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Published Online First: 2017.https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reduction-biology/
62
Cassirer E. The Problem of Knowledge: Philosophy, Science and History Since Hegel. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1950.
63
Craver CF. ‘Beyond Reduction: Mechanisms, Multi-Field Integration and the Unity of Neuroscience’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 2005;36:373–95.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369848605000245
64
Ghiselin MT. ‘Individuality, History and Laws of Nature in Biology’. In: What the Philosophy of Biology Is: Essays Dedicated to David Hull. Springer Netherlands 1989. 53–66.https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991006733279707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
65
Gotthelf A, Lennox JG. Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge University Press 1987. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003680109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
66
Helmreich S. ‘What was Life? Answers from Three Limit Biologies’. Critical Inquiry 2011;37:671–96.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.1086.660987&site=eds-live&scope=site
67
Kant I. Part 2 - ‘Critique of the Teleological Judgement’. In: Bernard JH, ed. Critique of Judgement. Mineola, NY: : Dover Publications 2005. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991000853589707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
68
Machamer P, Darden L, Craver CF. ‘Thinking About Mechanisms’. Philosophy of Science 2000;67:1–25.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.188611&site=eds-live&scope=site
69
Mayr E. This is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Cambridge, Mass: : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1997.
70
McLaughlin P. What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003402069707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
71
Nicholson DJ. The Concept of Mechanism in Biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2012;43:152–63.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369848611000501
72
Nicholson DJ, Gawne R. ‘Rethinking Woodger’s Legacy in the Philosophy of Biology’. Journal of the History of Biology 2014;47:243–92.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.43863377&site=eds-live&scope=site
73
Normandin S, Wolfe CT. Vitalism and the Scientific Image in Post-Enlightenment Life Science, 1800-2010. Dordrecht: : Springer 2013. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003823049707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
74
Rosenberg A. The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003523509707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
75
Schaffner KF. ‘Reduction: The Cheshire Cat Problem and a Return to Roots’. Synthese 2006;151:377–402.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.20118816&site=eds-live&scope=site
76
Skipper RA, Millstein RL. Thinking About Evolutionary Mechanisms: Natural Selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2005;36:327–47.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369848605000221
77
Stotz K. Biohumanities: Rethinking the Relationship Between Biosciences, Philosophy and History of Science and Society. The Quarterly Review of Biology 2008;83:37–45.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.1086.529561&site=eds-live&scope=site
78
Wilson EO. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. London: : Abacus 1999.
79
Woese CR. ‘A New Biology for a New Century’. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 2004;68:173–86.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbl&AN=RN151397139&site=eds-live&scope=site
80
Richards RA. Chapter 7: Species and taxonomy. In: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology. New York: : Oxford University Press 2008. 161–88.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195182057.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195182057-e-008
81
Mayr E. ‘The Ontological Status of Species: Scientific Progress and Philosophical Terminology’. Biology and Philosophy 1987;2:145–66.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=phl&AN=PHL1149260&site=eds-live&scope=site
82
Dupré J. ‘In Defence of Classification’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2001;32:203–19.https://encore.exeter.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rx1029723
83
Ereshefsky M. Chapter 6 - ‘Systematics and Taxonomy’. In: A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Malden, MA: : Blackwell Pub 2008. 99–118.https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991000545569707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
84
Sloan PR. ‘Buffon, German Biology and the Historical Interpretation of Biological Species’. The British Journal for the History of Science 1979;12:109–53.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.4025750&site=eds-live&scope=site
85
de Queiroz K. ‘Species Concepts and Species Delimitation’. Systematic Biology 2007;56:879–86.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.20143099&site=eds-live&scope=site
86
Richards RA. The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003375489707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
87
Berlin B. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press 1992. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991006191509707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
88
Cartwright N. Introduction. In: The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1999. 1–20.https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003554729707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
89
Cotton CM. Ethnobotany: Principles and Applications. Chichester: : Wiley 1996.
90
Douglas M, Hull DL. How Classification Works: Nelson Goodman Among the Social Sciences. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh U.P. 1992.
91
Dupré J. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1993.
92
Dupré J. Humans and Other Animals. Oxford: : Clarendon 2002.
93
Durkheim É, Mauss M. Primitive Classification. London: : Routledge 2010. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203092828
94
Ghiselin MT. ‘Species Concepts, Individuality and Objectivity’. Biology and Philosophy 1987;2:127–43.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=phl&AN=PHL1149259&site=eds-live&scope=site
95
Hull DL. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1988. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991006733439707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
96
Kellert SH, Longino HE, Waters KC. Scientific Pluralism. Minneapolis, MN: : University of Minnesota Press 2006. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991005786569707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
97
Leonelli S. ‘Classificatory Theory in Biology’. Biological Theory 2013;7:338–45.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13752-012-0049-z
98
Longino HE. Chapter 12 - ‘Towards an Epistemology for Biological Pluralism’. In: Biology and Epistemology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000. 261–86.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1e1eca7d-9796-e611-80c7-005056af4099
99
Mallet J. ‘Mayr’s View of Darwin: Was Darwin Wrong About Speciation?’ Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 2008;95:3–16.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbl&AN=RN237497168&site=eds-live&scope=site
100
Mayr E. Chapter 5 - ‘The Systematic Categories and the New Species Concept’. In: Systematics and the Origin of Species: From the Viewpoint of a Zoologist. New York: : Columbia University Press 1942. 102–22.https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.20284
101
Mayr E. Chapter 33 - ‘Species Concepts and Definitions’. In: Evolution and the Diversity of Life: Selected Essays. Cambridge, Mass: : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1976. 493–508.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bd202085-0496-e611-80c7-005056af4099
102
Mcouat G. ‘Cataloguing Power: Delineating “Competent Naturalists” and the Meaning of Species in the British Museum’. The British Journal for the History of Science 2001;34:1–28.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.4028036&site=eds-live&scope=site
103
O’Malley MA, Martin W, Dupré J. ‘The Tree of Life: Introduction to an Evolutionary Debate’. Biology & Philosophy 2010;25:441–53.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=phl&AN=PHL2194082&site=eds-live&scope=site
104
Panchen AL. Classification, Evolution and the Nature of Biology. Cambridge University Press 1992. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003719369707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
105
Plutynski A. Chapter 10 - ‘Specification and Macroevolution’. In: A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Malden, MA: : Blackwell Pub 2008. 169–85.https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991000545569707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
106
Rieppel O. ‘New Essentialism in Biology’. Philosophy of Science 2010;77:662–73.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.1086.656539&site=eds-live&scope=site
107
Sloan PR. ‘John Locke, John Ray and the Problem of the Natural System’. Journal of the History of Biology 1972;5:1–53.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.4330568&site=eds-live&scope=site
108
Ogilvie BW. ‘The Many Books of Nature: Renaissance Naturalists and Information Overload’. Journal of the History of Ideas 2003;64:29–40.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.2307.3654294&site=eds-live&scope=site
109
Müller-Wille S, Charmantier I. ‘Natural History and Information Overload: The Case of Linnaeus’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2012;43:4–15.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselp&AN=S1369848611001130&site=eds-live&scope=site
110
McOuat GR. Species, rules and meaning: The politics of language and the ends of definitions in 19th century natural history. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 1996;27:473–519.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0039368195000607
111
Farber PL. Finding Order in Nature: The Naturalist Tradition from Linnaeus to E. O. Wilson. Baltimore, Md: : Johns Hopkins University Press 2000. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991006733469707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
112
Mayr E. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance. Cambridge, Mass: : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1982.
113
Snyder LJ. William Whewell. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Published Online First: 2017.https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/whewell/
114
Bowker GC, Star SL. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2000. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003893979707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
115
Atran S. Cognitive Foundations of Natural History: Towards an Anthropology of Science. Cambridge: : Cambridge Universiy Press 1999.
116
Bacon F, Urbach P, Gibson J. Novum Organum: With Other Parts of the Great Instauration. Chicago, Ill: : Open Court 1994.
117
Barrera-Osorio A. Experiencing Nature: The Spanish American Empire and the Early Scientific Revolution. University of Texas Press: 2006.
118
Cook HJ. Matters of Exchange: Commerce, Medicine, and Science in the Dutch Golden Age. New Haven, Conn: : Yale University Press 2007. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003205809707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
119
Daston L. ‘Type Specimens and Scientific Memory’. Critical Inquiry 2004;31:153–82.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.1086.427306&site=eds-live&scope=site
120
te Heesen A. ‘Boxes in Nature’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2000;31:381–403.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbl&AN=RN083776481&site=eds-live&scope=site
121
Endersby J. Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science. Chicago, Ill: : University of Chicago Press 2008.
122
Jardine N. Cultures of Natural History. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
123
Law J, Lynch M. ‘Lists, Field Guides and the Descriptive Organization of Seeing: Birdwatching as an Exemplary Observational Activity’. Human Studies 1988;11:271–303.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.20009028&site=eds-live&scope=site
124
Müller-Wille S. ‘Collection and Collation: Theory and Practice of Linnaean Botany’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2007;38:541–62.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselp&AN=S1369848607000428&site=eds-live&scope=site
125
Ogilvie BW. The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe. Nachdr. Chicago, IL: : University of Chicago Press 2006. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991006733499707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
126
Pickstone JV. Ways of Knowing: A New History of Science, Technology and Medicine. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 2000.
127
Rieppel O. ‘The Series, the Network and the Tree: Changing Metaphors of Order in Nature’. Biology & Philosophy 2010;25:475–96.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbl&AN=RN276953629&site=eds-live&scope=site
128
Scharf ST. ‘Identification Keys, the “Natural Method” and the Development of Plant Identification Manuals’. Journal of the History of Biology 2009;42:73–117.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.40271533&site=eds-live&scope=site
129
Strasser BJ. Collecting and Experimenting: The Moral Economies of Biological Research, 1960s-1980s. History and Epistemology of Molecular Biology and Beyond: Problems and Perspectives: Workshop. 2006;310:105–23.http://biologie.unige.ch/assets/brunostrasser//Strasser_MPI_2006.pdf
130
Whewell W. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences. London: : Parker 1840.
131
Leonelli S. Introduction. In: Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study. Chicago: : The University of Chicago Press 2016. 1–9.http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780226416502
132
Leonelli S. Chapter 3: What Counts as Data? In: Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study. Chicago: : The University of Chicago Press 2016. 69–92.http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780226416502
133
Kell DB, Oliver SG. Here is the Evidence, Now What is the Hypothesis? The Complementary Roles of Inductive and Hypothesis-Driven Science in the Post-Genomic Era. BioEssays 2004;26:99–105.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bies.10385
134
Waters CK. The Nature and Context of Exploratory Experimentation: An Introduction to Three Case Studies of Exploratory Research. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 2007;29:275–84.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/23334262
135
Hey AJG, Tansley S, Tolle K. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Microsoft Research 2009. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/fourth-paradigm-data-intensive-scientific-discovery
136
Leonelli S. What Difference Does Quantity Make? On the Epistemology of Big Data in Biology. Big Data & Society 2014;1:1–11.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2053951714534395
137
Strasser BJ. Collecting Nature: Practices, Styles and Narratives. Osiris 2012;27:303–40.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/667832
138
Allen JF. Bioinformatics and Discovery: Induction Beckons Again. BioEssays 2000;23:104–7.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/1521-1878%28200101%2923%3A1%3C104%3A%3AAID-BIES1013%3E3.0.CO%3B2-2
139
Botstein D, Cherry JM, Ashburner M, et al. Gene Ontology: Tool for the Unification of Biology. Nature Genetics 2000;25:25–9.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v25/n1/full/ng0500_25.html
140
Bell G, Hey T, Szalay A. Beyond the Data Deluge. Science 2009;323:1297–8.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/25471626
141
Blake JA, Bult CJ. Beyond the Data Deluge: Data Integration and Bio-Ontologies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2006;39:314–20.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046406000190
142
Boyd D, Crawford K. Critical Questions for Big Data: Provocations for a Cultural, Technological and Scholarly Phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society 2012;15:662–79.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
143
Burian RM. Exploratory Experimentation and the Role of Histochemical Techniques in the Work of Jean Brachet, 1938-1952. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 1997;19:27–45.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/23332033
144
Benson E. One Infrastructure, Many Global Visions: The Commercialization and Diversification of Argos, a Satellite-Based Environmental Surveillance System. Social Studies of Science 2012;42:843–68.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/41721363
145
Canali S. Big Data, Epistemology and Causality: Knowledge In and Knowledge Out in EXPOsOMICS. Big Data & Society 2016;3.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2053951716669530
146
Chicurel M. Bioinformatics: Bringing it All Together Technology Feature. Nature 2002;419:751–7.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.nature.com/articles/419751a
147
Delbourgo J, Müller-Wille S. Focus: Listmania, Introduction. Isis 2012;103:710–5.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/669045
148
Davies G. Arguably Big Biology: Sociology, Spatiality and the Knockout Mouse Project. BioSocieties 2013;8:417–31.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/biosoc.2013.25
149
Elliott KC, Cheruvelil KS, Montgomery GM, et al. Conceptions of Good Science in Our Data-Rich World. BioScience 2016;66:880–9.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/66/10/880/2236154
150
Floridi L. The Philosophy of Information. Oxford University Press 2011. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232383.001.0001/acprof-9780199232383
151
Floridi L, Illari P. The Philosophy of Information Quality. Cham: : Springer 2014. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9783319071213
152
Fox Keller E. Towards a Science of Informed Matter. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2011;42:174–9.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369848610001172
153
Fujimura JH. The Practices of Producing Meaning in Bioinformatics. In: The Practices of Human Genetics. Dordrecht: : Kluwer Academic 1999. 49–87.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0eb6e4bb-fd99-e611-80c7-005056af4099
154
Fry B. Visualizing Data: Exploring and Explaining Data with the Processing Environment. Beijing: : O’Reilly Media 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780596519308
155
Garcia-Sancho M. Biology, Computing, and the History of Molecular Sequencing. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/book/10.1057%2F9780230370937
156
Gilbert W. Towards a Paradigm Shift in Biology. Nature 1991;349:99–99.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.nature.com/articles/349099a0.pdf
157
Kitchin R. The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures & Their Consequences. London: : SAGE Publications Ltd 2014. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-data-revolution
158
Leonelli S. Introduction: Making Sense of Data-Driven Research in the Biological and Biomedical Sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2012;43:1–3.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136984861100077X
159
Mittelstadt BD, Floridi L. The Ethics of Biomedical Big Data. 1st ed. 2016 edition. Cham: : Springer 2016. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9783319335254
160
O’Malley MA, Elliott KC, Haufe C, et al. Philosophies of Funding. Cell 2009;138:611–5.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867409009714
161
O’Malley MA, Soyer OS. The Roles of Integration in Molecular Systems Biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2012;43:58–68.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369848611000823
162
Rhee SY. Carpe Diem. Retooling the ‘Publish or Perish’ Model into the ‘Share and Survive’ Model. Plant Physiology 2004;134:543–7.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4281585
163
The Royal Society. Science as an Open Enterprise: Final Report. 2012.https://royalsociety.org/policy/projects/science-public-enterprise/Report/
164
Rubin DL, Lewis SE, Mungall CJ, et al. The National Center for Biomedical Ontology: Advancing Biomedicine Through Structured Organization of Scientific Knowledge. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 2006;10:185–98.https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/omi.2006.10.185
165
Stevens H. Life Out of Sequence: A Data-Driven History of Bioinformatics. Chicago, Ill: : The University of Chicago Press 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=1377287
166
Vickers J. The Problem of Induction. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Published Online First: 2009.http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/induction-problem
167
Dupré J. Chapter 5: Human Nature: A Process Perspective. In: Why We Disagree About Human Nature. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018. 92–107.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2a09c4b2-f980-e811-80cd-005056af4099
168
Allen GE. The social and economic origins of genetic determinism: A case history of the American Eugenics Movement, 1900–1940 and its lessons for today. Genetica 1997;99:77–88.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1018396529332
169
Griffiths P. ‘The Distinction Between Innate and Acquired Characteristics’. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Published Online First: 2009.http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/innate-acquired/
170
Keller EF. The Mirage of a Space Between Nature and Nurture. Durham, NC: : Duke University Press 2010. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991008369919707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
171
Griffiths PE, Stotz K. Chapter 5 - ‘Gene’. In: The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007. 85–102.https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991015275109707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
172
Rheinberger H-J, Müller-Wille S. The Gene: From Genetics to Postgenomics. Chicago: : The University of Chicago Press 2017.
173
Johannsen W. ‘The Genotype Conception of Heredity’. The American Naturalist 1911;45:129–59.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.2455747&site=eds-live&scope=site
174
Amundson R. The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge University Press 2005. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003244789707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
175
Bechtel W. Discovering Cell Mechanisms: The Creation of Modern Cell Biology. Cambridge University Press 2006. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003215209707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
176
Beurton PJ, Falk R, Rheinberger H-J. The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Cambridge University Press 2000. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991003309559707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
177
Burian RM. ‘Unification and Coherence as Methodological Objectives in the Biological Sciences’. Biology & Philosophy 1993;8:301–18.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=phl&AN=PHL1238615&site=eds-live&scope=site
178
Dawkins R. The Selfish Gene. 30th anniversary ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2006. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=87017&entityid=https://elibrary.exeter.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
179
Fagan MB. Philosophy of Stem Cell Biology: Knowledge in Flesh and Blood. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781137296023
180
Falk R. Genetic Analysis: A History of Genetic Thinking. Cambridge University Press 2009. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.cambridge.org/core/books/genetic-analysis/A37A6BD3657B8AC2B6B1C12F33D8BC4C
181
Gayon J. Darwinism’s Struggle for Survival: Heredity and the Hypothesis of Natural Selection. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
182
Griffiths PE. Genetic Information: A Metaphor in Search of a Theory. Philosophy of Science 2001;68:394–412.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3080926
183
Griffiths PE, Gray RD. Chapter 19: The Developmental Systems Perspective: Organism-Environment Systems as Units of Evolution. In: Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes. Oxford, England: : Oxford University Press 2004. 409–31.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c4af4450-d296-e611-80c7-005056af4099
184
Griffiths P, Machery E, Linquist S. The Vernacular Concept of Innateness. Mind & Language 2009;24:605–30.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01376.x/full
185
Griffiths P, Stotz K. Genetics and Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press 2013. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.cambridge.org/core/books/genetics-and-philosophy/F3255AB9D97A5736BA3F621194CEC542
186
Griffiths PE, Tabery J. Chapter 3: Developmental Systems Theory: What Does it Explain and How Does it Explain it? In: Lerner RM, Benson JB, eds. Embodiment and Epigenesis: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Understanding the Role of Biology within the Relational Developmental System, Part A: Philosophical, Theorectical, and Biological Dimensions. Amsterdam: : Academic Press 2013. 65–94.http://www.vlebooks.com/Vleweb/Product/Index/410382?page=0
187
Jacob F. The Logic of Life: A History of Heredity. Princeton, NJ: : Princeton University Press 1973.
188
Jablonka E, Lamb MJ. Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1995.
189
Kay LE. Who Wrote the Book of Life?: A History of the Genetic Code. Stanford: : Stanford University Press 2000.
190
Leonelli S. Chapter 10: Understanding in Biology: The Impure Nature of Biological Knowledge. In: Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives. University of Pittsburgh Press 2009. 189–209.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qh59s.13
191
Rose S, Kamin LJ, Lewontin RC. Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature. Harmondsworth: : Penguin 1984.
192
Mameli M, Bateson P. Innateness and the Sciences. Biology & Philosophy 2006;21:155–88.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10539-005-5144-0
193
Mendelsohn JA. Lives of the Cell. Journal of the History of Biology 2003;36:1–37.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4331779
194
Moss L. What Genes Can’t Do. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2003. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=78120&site=ehost-live
195
Olby RC. Origins of Mendelism. Constable 1966.
196
O’Malley MA, Müller-Wille S. The Cell as Nexus: Connections Between the History, Philosophy and Science of Cell Biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2010;41:169–71.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369848610000397
197
Reynolds A. The Theory of the Cell State and the Question of Cell Autonomy in Nineteenth and Early Twentieth-Century Biology. Science in Context 2007;20:71–95.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/science-in-context/article/theory-of-the-cell-state-and-the-question-of-cell-autonomy-in-nineteenth-and-early-twentiethcentury-biology/786F57CF546A1D3ABB607B8C8F857B50
198
Richardson SS. Sex Itself: The Search for Male and Female in the Human Genome. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=1431257
199
Johns Schloegel J, Schmidgen H. General Physiology, Experimental Psychology and Evolutionism. Isis 2002;93:614–45.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/375954
200
Stotz K, Griffiths PE, Knight R. How Biologists Conceptualize Genes: An Empirical Study. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2004;35:647–73.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136984860400069X
201
Stotz K, Griffiths P. Genes: Philosophical Analyses Put to the Test. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 2004;26:5–28.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/23333378
202
Waters CK. What Was Classical Genetics? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2004;35:783–809.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003936810400086X
203
Frigg R, Hartmann S. Models in science. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Published Online First: 2012.http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/models-science/
204
Levins R. The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology. American Scientist 1966;54:421–31.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/27836590
205
Ankeny RA, Leonelli S. What’s So Special About Model Organisms? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2011;42:313–23.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039368110001184
206
Morrison M, Morgan MS. Chapter 2: Models as Mediating Instruments. In: Morgan MS, Morrison M, eds. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Sciences. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1999. 10–37.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.cambridge.org/core/books/models-as-mediators/models-as-mediating-instruments/10737C6DD4744A65E4B5B89B3D489B21
207
Weber M. Chapter 3: Walking on the Chromosome: Drosophila and the Molecularization of Development. In: From Molecular Genetics to Genomics: The Mapping Cultures of Twentieth-Century Genetics. London: : Routledge 2004. 63–78.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=024b253e-9197-e611-80c7-005056af4099
208
Ankeny RA, Leonelli S. Organisms in Experimental Research. In: Handbook of the Historiography of Biology. Cham: : Springer 2019. 1–25.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-74456-8_15-1
209
Bailer-Jones DM. Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science. University of Pittsburgh Press 2009. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5vkdnq
210
de Chadarevian S. Of Worms and Programmes: Caenorhabditis Elegans and the Study of Development. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 1998;29:81–105.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369848698000041
211
de Chadarevian S. Chapter 12: Models and the Making of Molecular Biology. In: Models: The Third Dimension of Science. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford University Press 2004. 339–68.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c0781cd8-9597-e611-80c7-005056af4099
212
Craver CF, Darden L. In Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries Across the Life Sciences. University of Chicago Press 2013.
213
Creager ANH. The Life of a Virus: Tobacco Mosaic Virus as an Experimental Model, 1930-1965. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2002.
214
Davies G. Captivating Behaviour: Mouse Models, Experimental Genetics and Reductionist Returns in the Neurosciences. The Sociological Review 2010;58:53–72.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01911.x/full
215
Davies G. What is a Humanized Mouse? Remaking the Species and Spaces of Translational Medicine. Body & Society 2012;18:126–55.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1357034X12446378
216
French S, Ladyman J. Reinflating the Semantic Approach. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1999;13:103–21.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02698599908573612
217
Godfrey-Smith P. The Strategy of Model-Based Science. Biology & Philosophy 2010;21:725–40.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10539-006-9054-6
218
Griesemer JR. Material Models in Biology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990;1990:79–93.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/193060
219
Knuuttila T. Models, Representation and Mediation. Philosophy of Science 2005;72:1260–71.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/508124
220
Meunier R. Stages in the Development of a Model Organism as a Platform for Mechanistic Models in Developmental Biology: Zebrafish, 1970–2000. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2012;43:522–31.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369848611001403
221
Morgan MS. Chapter 1: Modelling as a Method of Enquiry. In: The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think. Cambridge University Press 2012. 1–43.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.cambridge.org/core/books/world-in-the-model/modelling-as-a-method-of-enquiry/5592F5DADCD2785B106FC69CA01D498D
222
Morgan MS, Morrison M. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press 1999. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.cambridge.org/core/books/models-as-mediators/FBB3EA4AECAF824AD6F1E6C650CAE3AE
223
Nelson NC. Model Behavior: Animal Experiments, Complexity and the Genetics of Psychiatric Disorders. Chicago, IL: : University of Chicago Press 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=5101436
224
Suárez M. Theories, Models and Representations. In: Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. New York, NY: : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publ 1999. 75–83.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7051aeb2-ec99-e611-80c7-005056af4099
225
Suárez M. An Inferential Conception of Scientific Representation. Philosophy of Science 2004;71:767–79.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/421415
226
Weisberg M. Who is a Modeler? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2007;58:207–33.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/30115224
227
Weisberg M. Forty Years of ‘The Strategy’: Levins on Model Building and Idealization. Biology & Philosophy 2006;21:623–45.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10539-006-9051-9
228
Weisberg M. Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World. Oxford University Press 2013. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199933662.001.0001/acprof-9780199933662
229
Kohler RE. Systems of production: Drosophila, neurospora, and biochemical genetics. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 1991;22:87–130.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/27757674
230
Rheinberger H-J. From microsomes to ribosomes: ‘Strategies’ of ‘representation’. Journal of the History of Biology 1995;28:49–89.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4331335
231
Weber M. Chapter 25: Experimentation. In: A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Malden, MA: : Blackwell Pub 2008. 472–88.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/reader.action?docID=470333&ppg=500
232
Bernard C. Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine. New York: : Dover 1985.
233
Burian RM. Technique, Task Definition and the Transition From Genetics to Molecular Genetics: Aspects of the Work on Protein Synthesis in the Laboratories of J. Monod and P. Zamecnik. Journal of the History of Biology 1993;26:387–407.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4331278
234
Radder H. The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation. Pittsburgh, PA: : University of Pittsburgh Press 2003. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt5hjsnf
235
Burian R. The Epistemology of Development, Evolution, and Genetics. Cambridge University Press 2004. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.cambridge.org/core/books/epistemology-of-development-evolution-and-genetics/8E670690F1F342968730B17CF769EA41#
236
De Chadarevian S. Laboratory Science Versus Country-House Experiments. The Controversy Between Julius Sachs and Charles Darwin. The British Journal for the History of Science 1996;29:17–41.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4027510
237
Chadarevian S de. Designs For Life: Molecular Biology After World War II. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002.
238
Coleman W, Holmes FL. The Investigative Enterprise: Experimental Physiology in Nineteenth-Century Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 1988.
239
Endy D. Foundations for Engineering Biology. Nature 2005;438:449–53.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.nature.com/articles/nature04342
240
Holmes FL. Investigative Pathways: Patterns and Stages in the Careers of Experimental Scientists. New Haven, Conn: : Yale University Press 2004.
241
Keller EF. Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors and Machines. Cambridge, MA: : Harvard University Press 2002. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780674039445
242
Kohler RE. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1994.
243
Kroes P. Technology and Science-Based Heurisitics. In: New Directions in the Philosophy of Technology. Dordrecht: : Kluwer 1995. 17–39.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d4eaddf3-eb99-e611-80c7-005056af4099
244
Landecker H. Culturing life: How Cells Became Technologies. Harvard University Press 2007. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb09113
245
Lenoir T. The Strategy of Life: Teleology and Mechanics in Nineteenth-Century German Biology. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1989.
246
Olby RC. The Path to the Double Helix: The Discovery of DNA. New York: : Dover Publications 1994.
247
O’Malley MA, Powell A, Davies JF, et al. Knowledge-Making Distinctions in Synthetic Biology. BioEssays 2008;30:57–65.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bies.20664/full
248
Pauly PJ. Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology. New York: : Oxford University Press 1987. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780195364668
249
Rheinberger H-J. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford University Press 1997.
250
Schmidgen H. Pictures, Preparations, and Living Processes: The Production of Immediate Visual Perception (Anschauung) in Late-19th-Century Physiology. Journal of the History of Biology 2004;37:477–513.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4331897
251
Weber M. Philosophy of Experimental Biology. Cambridge University Press 2004. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.cambridge.org/core/books/philosophy-of-experimental-biology/F53C6D06123469E4C493CEE61BA0D127
252
Müller-Wille S. The Dark Side of Evolution: Caprice, Deceit, Redundancy. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 2009;31:183–99.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/23334442
253
Day RL, Laland KN, Odling-Smee FJ. Rethinking Adaptation: The Niche-Construction Perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 2003;46:80–95.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://muse.jhu.edu/article/38634
254
O’Malley MA, Dupré J. Size doesn’t matter: Towards a more inclusive philosophy of biology. Biology & Philosophy 2007;22:155–91.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10539-006-9031-0
255
Egerton FN. Changing Concepts of the Balance of Nature. The Quarterly Review of Biology 1973;48:322–50.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2820544
256
Plutynski A. Chapter 21: Ecology and the Environment. In: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press 2008. 505–24.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195182057.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195182057-e-022
257
Wilson DS, Sober E. Reviving the Superorganism. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1989;136:337–56.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519389801699
258
Canguilhem G. The Development of the Concept of Biological Regulation in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. In: Ideology and Rationality in the History of the Life Sciences. 1988. 81–102.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c03efb17-ffd7-e611-80c9-005056af4099
259
Daston L, Vidal F. The Moral Authority of Nature. Chicago, Ill: : University of Chicago Press 2004. https://exeter.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991002185209707446&context=L&vid=44UOEX_INST:default
260
Dennett DC. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. London: : Penguin 1996.
261
Gilbert SF, Epel D. Ecological Developmental Biology: Integrating Epigenetics, Medicine, and Evolution - An Integrated Approach to Embryology, Evolution, and Medicine. Sunderland, Mass: : Sinauer Associates 2009.
262
Haraway D. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=328400
263
Hinchliffe S. Geographies of Nature: Societies, Environments, Ecologies. Los Angeles, Calif: : SAGE 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781848607491
264
Jablonka E, Lamb MJ, Zeligowski A. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Revised edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: : A Bradford Book 2014. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=3339771
265
Keller EF. Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth-Century Biology. New York: : Columbia University Press 1995.
266
Margulis L. Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution. 1st ed. New York: : Basic Books 1998. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=679945
267
Müller-Wille S, Rheinberger H-J. Chapter 1: Heredity - The Formation of an Epistemic Space. In: Heredity Produced: At the Crossroads of Biology, Politics and Culture, 1500-1870. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2007. 3–34.http://www.vlebooks.com/Vleweb/Product/Index/997468?page=0
268
Odenbaugh J. Struggling with the Science of Ecology. Biology & Philosophy 2006;21:395–409.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10539-005-4055-4
269
Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW. Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton University Press 2003. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt24hqpd
270
Okasha S. Evolution and the Levels of Selection. Oxford University Press 2006. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267972.001.0001/acprof-9780199267972
271
Oyama S, Griffiths PE, Gray RD. Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: : MIT Press 2001.
272
Roughgarden J. Evolution’s Rainbow: Diversity, Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/exeter/detail.action?docID=1375430
273
Odenbaugh J. Conservation Biology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Published Online First: 2016.https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/conservation-biology/
274
Sarkar S. Ecology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Published Online First: 2005.http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ecology
275
Schiebinger L. Nature’s Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science. Rutgers University Press 2004.
276
Schweber SS. Darwin and the Political Economists: Divergence of Character. Journal of the History of Biology 1980;13:195–289.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4330766
277
Young RM. Darwin’s Metaphor: Nature’s Place in Victorian Culture. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.
278
Reiss J, Ankeny RA. Philosophy of Medicine. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Published Online First: 2016.https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/medicine/
279
Foucault M. Right of death and power over life. In: The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: : Penguin 1986. 258–72.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=acf76f99-bf9a-e611-80c7-005056af4099
280
Boniolo G. Chapter 1: Molecular Medicine: The Clinical Method Enters the Lab. In: Philosophy of Molecular Medicine: Foundational Issues in Research and Practice. New York : : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2017. 15–34.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781317378358/chapters/10.4324%2F9781315674162-8
281
Boniolo G, Nathan MJ. Philosophy of Molecular Medicine: Foundational Issues in Research and Practice. New York : : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2017. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315674162
282
Boorse C. Health as a Theoretical Concept. Philosophy of Science 1977;44:542–73.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/186939
283
Kingma E. Paracetamol, Poison, and Polio: Why Boorse’s Account of Function Fails to Distinguish Health and Disease. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2010;61:241–64.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/40664348
284
Lennox JG. Health as an Objective Value. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1995;20:499–511.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://academic.oup.com/jmp/article/20/5/499/924077/Health-as-an-Objective-Value
285
Grene M. Philosophy of Medicine: Prolegomena to a Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976;1976:77–93.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/192374
286
Amundson R. Against Normal Function. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2000;31:33–53.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369848699000333
287
Canguilhem G. The Normal and the Pathological. New York: : Zone Books 1989.
288
Canguilhem G, Geroulanos S, Meyers T. Writings on Medicine. Fordham University Press 2012. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1c84gs6
289
Carel H. Illness: The Cry of the Flesh. Revised edition. London: : Routledge 2013. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/illness-havi-carel/10.4324/9781315487410
290
Cunningham A, Williams P. The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992.
291
Engelhardt HT. The Philosophy of Medicine: Framing the Field. Dordrecht: : Kluwer Acad. Publ 2000.
292
Fortun M, Mendelsohn E. The Practices of Human Genetics. Dordrecht: : Kluwer Academic 1999.
293
Foucault M. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. London: : Routledge 2003. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9781135864767
294
Foucault M, Bertani M. Society Must be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-76: Lectures at the College De France, 1975 76. London: : Penguin 2004.
295
Gannett L. Chapter 19: Genes and Society. In: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology. New York: : Oxford University Press 2008. 451–77.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195182057.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195182057-e-020
296
Gannett L. The Biological Reification of Race. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2004;55:323–45.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3541694
297
Hacking I. Genetics, Biosocial Groups and the Future of Identity. Daedalus 2006;135:81–95.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/20028075
298
Longino HE, Keller EF. Feminism and Science. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1996.
299
Kevles DJ. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1995.
300
Koenig BA, Lee SS-J, Richardson SS. Revisiting Race in a Genomic Age. New Brunswick, N.J.: : Rutgers University Press 2008.
301
Magnus D. Chapter 23: The Concept of Genetic Disease. In: Health, Disease and Illness: Concepts in Medicine. Washington, D.C.: : Georgetown University Press 2004. 233–42.
302
Grmek MD. Pathological Realities: Essays on Disease, Experiments, and History. New York, NY: : Fordham University Press 2018. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv75d9nq
303
Paul DB. Controlling Human Heredity: 1865 to the Present. Atlantic Highlands, N.J: : Humanities Press 1995.
304
Sunder Rajan K. Pharmocracy: Value, Politics, and Knowledge in Global Biomedicine. Durham, [North Carolina]: : Duke University Press 2017. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Exeter&isbn=9780822373285
305
Reardon J. Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in an Age of Genomics. Princeton, NJ: : Princeton University Press 2005. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7t00f
306
Root M. The use of race in medicine as a proxy for genetic differences. Philosophy of Science 2003;70:1173–83.https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/377398
307
Schaffner KF. Philosophy of medicine. In: Introduction to the Philosophy of Science: A Text. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: : Prentice Hall 1992. 310–45.
308
Temkin O. Chapter 29: Health and disease. In: The Double Face of Janus and Other Essays in the History of Medicine. Baltimore, Md: : Johns Hopkins University Press 2006. 419–40.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ea5e0181-cb9a-e611-80c7-005056af4099
309
UNESCO. The Race Question in Modern Science: Results of an Inquiry. 1952.http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0007/000733/073351eo.pdf
