1.
Law - LibGuides at University of Exeter [Internet]. Available from: http://libguides.exeter.ac.uk/LawHomePage
2.
Craig PP, De Búrca G. EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
3.
Foster NG. Blackstone’s EU Treaties & Legislation 2010-2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
4.
Foster NG. Blackstone’s EU Treaties & Legislation, 2012-2013. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
5.
Chalmers D, Davies GT, Monti G. European Union Law: Cases and Materials. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
6.
Fairhurst J. Chapter 1: ‘An introduction to the European Communities and the European Union’ [in] Law of the European Union. Law of the European Union [Internet]. Eleventh edition. Harlow, England: Pearson; 2016. p. 3–56. Available from: https://shibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&target=https%3A%2F%2Fshibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net%2Fshib%3Fdest%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.vlebooks.com%252FSHIBBOLETH%253Fdest%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.vlebooks.com%25252Fvleweb%25252Fproduct%25252Fopenreader%25253Fid%25253DExeter%252526isbn%25253D9781292090351
7.
Fairhurst J. Chapter 2: ‘Sources of EU law (including general principles of law and fundamental rights)’ [in] Law of the European Union. Law of the European Union [Internet]. Eleventh edition. Harlow, England: Pearson; 2016. p. 57–90. Available from: https://shibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Felibrary.exeter.ac.uk%2Fidp%2Fshibboleth&target=https%3A%2F%2Fshibboleth2sp.gar.semcs.net%2Fshib%3Fdest%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.vlebooks.com%252FSHIBBOLETH%253Fdest%253Dhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.vlebooks.com%25252Fvleweb%25252Fproduct%25252Fopenreader%25253Fid%25253DExeter%252526isbn%25253D9781292090351
8.
Barnard C. Trailing a New Approach to Free Movement of Goods? Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 2009;68(2):288–290. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-law-journal/article/trailing-a-new-approach-to-free-movement-of-goods/58B5DBF1FC7EBEFC4259E4FAABDDA14F
9.
Spaventa E. Leaving Keck Behind? The Free Movement of Goods after the Rulings in Commission v Italy and Mickelsson and Roos. European Law Review [Internet]. 2009;34(6):914–932. Available from: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/ID0F118E0E60511DE9898DCDACE788896/View/FullText.html?navigationPath=Search%2Fv1%2Fresults%2Fnavigation%2Fi0ad73aa50000016d63e35ce80432735a%3FNav%3DUK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION%26fragmentIdentifier%3DID0F118E0E60511DE9898DCDACE788896%26parentRank%3D0%26startIndex%3D1%26contextData%3D%2528sc.Default%2529%26transitionType%3DSearchItem&listSource=Search&listPageSource=e2a57ff44eb4d9e3a44f3621d6c1f95d&list=UK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION&rank=6&sessionScopeId=2ae2dbe46232994be2a5f5121f6db076cdf90652c9a8dedc0b7fbf706833874c&originationContext=Search+Result&transitionType=SearchItem&contextData=%28sc.Default%29&comp=wluk
10.
Lianos I. In Memoriam Keck: The Reformation of the EU Law on the Free Movement of Goods. European Law Review [Internet]. 2015;40(2):225–248. Available from: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I5EF75690E55B11E497ADC07148925A82/View/FullText.html?navigationPath=Search%2Fv1%2Fresults%2Fnavigation%2Fi0ad73aa50000016d63e4e26c0432b3ac%3FNav%3DUK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION%26fragmentIdentifier%3DI5EF75690E55B11E497ADC07148925A82%26parentRank%3D0%26startIndex%3D1%26contextData%3D%2528sc.Default%2529%26transitionType%3DSearchItem&listSource=Search&listPageSource=c43405f422dcb7c3fee8107f2b8897f5&list=UK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION&rank=6&sessionScopeId=2ae2dbe46232994be2a5f5121f6db076cdf90652c9a8dedc0b7fbf706833874c&originationContext=Search+Result&transitionType=SearchItem&contextData=%28sc.Default%29&comp=wluk
11.
Snell J. The Notion of Market Access: A Concept or a Slogan? Common Market Law Review [Internet]. 2010;47:437–472. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=82e6784d-04fa-e811-80cd-005056af4099
12.
Wenneras P, Moen KB. Selling Arrangements, Keeping Keck. European Law Review [Internet]. 2010;35(3):387–400. Available from: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I756D6A007B4C11DFB24F8F0CA03B21E6/View/FullText.html?navigationPath=Search%2Fv1%2Fresults%2Fnavigation%2Fi0ad73aa50000016d63e6773a04333ab1%3FNav%3DUK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION%26fragmentIdentifier%3DI756D6A007B4C11DFB24F8F0CA03B21E6%26parentRank%3D0%26startIndex%3D1%26contextData%3D%2528sc.Default%2529%26transitionType%3DSearchItem&listSource=Search&listPageSource=c4204c069d781ed946acb0243d5e683d&list=UK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION&rank=6&sessionScopeId=2ae2dbe46232994be2a5f5121f6db076cdf90652c9a8dedc0b7fbf706833874c&originationContext=Search+Result&transitionType=SearchItem&contextData=%28sc.Default%29&comp=wluk
13.
Enchelmaier S. Moped Trailers, Mickelsson and Roos, Gysbrechts: The ECJ’s Case Law on Goods Keeps on Moving. Yearbook of European Law [Internet]. 2010;29(1):190–223. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://academic.oup.com/yel/article/29/1/190/1618115
14.
Albors-Llorens A. Remedies Against the EU Institutions after Lisbon: An Era of Opportunity? Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 2012;71(3):507–536. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-law-journal/article/remedies-against-the-eu-institutions-after-lisbon-an-era-of-opportunity/F2A8103107BED0BF2C626D35A29120FC
15.
Nassimpian D. ... And we Keep on Meeting: (De)fragmenting State Liability. European Law Review [Internet]. 2007;32:819–838. Available from: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/IC90A72A09D4D11DCB62EFEF989A9D832/View/FullText.html?navigationPath=Search%2Fv1%2Fresults%2Fnavigation%2Fi0ad73aa50000016d63ecdd9d0435ff42%3FNav%3DUK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION%26fragmentIdentifier%3DIC90A72A09D4D11DCB62EFEF989A9D832%26parentRank%3D0%26startIndex%3D1%26contextData%3D%2528sc.Default%2529%26transitionType%3DSearchItem&listSource=Search&listPageSource=27b1132bbe3ef4dfc9f73bd197e37ba3&list=UK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION&rank=3&sessionScopeId=9242635d082f554185766ae198d3fdeceee855b08e0bdc0a76f231572ebc4cc1&originationContext=Search+Result&transitionType=SearchItem&contextData=%28sc.Default%29&comp=wluk
16.
Arnull A. The Law Lords and the European Union: Swimming with the Incoming Tide. European Law Review [Internet]. 2010;35(1):57–87. Available from: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I7E0F96E1185211DFA59B8481EF0A50BF/View/FullText.html?navigationPath=Search%2Fv1%2Fresults%2Fnavigation%2Fi0ad73aa50000016d63eded68043636af%3FNav%3DUK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION%26fragmentIdentifier%3DI7E0F96E1185211DFA59B8481EF0A50BF%26parentRank%3D0%26startIndex%3D1%26contextData%3D%2528sc.Default%2529%26transitionType%3DSearchItem&listSource=Search&listPageSource=88b495d4773554e3320fa879192a773f&list=UK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION&rank=4&sessionScopeId=9242635d082f554185766ae198d3fdeceee855b08e0bdc0a76f231572ebc4cc1&originationContext=Search+Result&transitionType=SearchItem&contextData=%28sc.Default%29&comp=wluk
17.
Wenneras P. Sanctions against Member States under Article 260 TFEU: Alive, But Not Kicking? Common Market Law Review [Internet]. 2012;49:145–176. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=52a4a8b7-037f-e611-80c6-005056af4099
18.
Craig P. ‘The Treaty of Lisbon, Process, Architecture and Substance’ [in] European Law Review. European Law Review [Internet]. 2008;33(2):137–166. Available from: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/IC9DFA900050011DDB4CAEB097341DE3B/View/FullText.html?navigationPath=Search%2Fv1%2Fresults%2Fnavigation%2Fi0ad73aa50000016d63ef6b250436a24f%3FNav%3DUK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION%26fragmentIdentifier%3DIC9DFA900050011DDB4CAEB097341DE3B%26parentRank%3D0%26startIndex%3D1%26contextData%3D%2528sc.Default%2529%26transitionType%3DSearchItem&listSource=Search&listPageSource=f455f7421b1686e301d5b2b734050de8&list=UK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION&rank=2&sessionScopeId=9242635d082f554185766ae198d3fdeceee855b08e0bdc0a76f231572ebc4cc1&originationContext=Search+Result&transitionType=SearchItem&contextData=%28sc.Default%29&comp=wluk
19.
Dougan M. The Treaty of Lisbon 2007: Winning Minds, Not Hearts. Common Market Law Review [Internet]. 2008;45(3):617–704. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2008047
20.
Sauter W. The Economic Constitution of the European Union. Columbia Journal of European Law [Internet]. 1998;4(1):27–68. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/coljeul4&i=33
21.
Pescatore P. The Doctrine of ‘Direct Effect’: An Infant Disease of Community Law. European Law Review [Internet]. 2015;40(2):135–153. Available from: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I5EEA3730E55B11E497ADC07148925A82/View/FullText.html?navigationPath=Search%2Fv1%2Fresults%2Fnavigation%2Fi0ad73aa50000016d63f0f31904370ed7%3FNav%3DUK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION%26fragmentIdentifier%3DI5EEA3730E55B11E497ADC07148925A82%26parentRank%3D0%26startIndex%3D1%26contextData%3D%2528sc.Default%2529%26transitionType%3DSearchItem&listSource=Search&listPageSource=329290436436496af36bfbe4fe3ae7ea&list=UK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION&rank=2&sessionScopeId=9242635d082f554185766ae198d3fdeceee855b08e0bdc0a76f231572ebc4cc1&originationContext=Search+Result&transitionType=SearchItem&contextData=%28sc.Default%29&comp=wluk
22.
Craig P. Constitutional Process and Reform in the EU: Nice, Laeken, the Convention and the IGC. European Public Law [Internet]. 2004;10(4):653–675. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=796f1231-02fa-e811-80cd-005056af4099
23.
Curtin D. The Constitutional Structure of the Union: A Europe of Bits and Pieces. Common Market Law Review [Internet]. 1993;30(1):17–69. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e78eea19-08fa-e811-80cd-005056af4099
24.
MacCormick N. Beyond the Sovereign State. Modern Law Review [Internet]. 1993;56(1):1–18. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1993.tb02851.x
25.
Stein E. Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution. American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1981;75(1):1–27. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2201413
26.
Walker N. Legal Theory and the European Union: A 25th Anniversary Essay. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies [Internet]. 2005;25(4):581–601. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://academic.oup.com/ojls/article/25/4/581/1510521
27.
Weiler JHH. The Transformation of Europe. Yale Law Journal [Internet]. 1991;100(8):2403–2483. Available from: https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/796898
28.
Balthasar S. Locus Standi Rules for Challenges to Regulatory Acts by Private Applicants: The New Art.263(4) TFEU. European Law Review [Internet]. 2010;35(4):542–550. Available from: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/ICD9FA8B0A74C11DFB425AFEF504AC682/View/FullText.html?navigationPath=Search%2Fv1%2Fresults%2Fnavigation%2Fi0ad73aa50000016d63f516b2043792df%3FNav%3DUK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION%26fragmentIdentifier%3DICD9FA8B0A74C11DFB425AFEF504AC682%26parentRank%3D0%26startIndex%3D1%26contextData%3D%2528sc.Default%2529%26transitionType%3DSearchItem&listSource=Search&listPageSource=a4b5b3979675d1bd7c5fdf53d871c930&list=UK-JOURNALS-PUBLICATION&rank=6&sessionScopeId=9242635d082f554185766ae198d3fdeceee855b08e0bdc0a76f231572ebc4cc1&originationContext=Search+Result&transitionType=SearchItem&contextData=%28sc.Default%29&comp=wluk
29.
Eckes C. EU Restrictive Measures Against Natural and Legal Persons: From Counterterrorist to Third Country Sanctions. Common Market Law Review [Internet]. Kluwer Law International; 2014;51(3):869–905. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4ba8c42d-057f-e611-80c6-005056af4099
